IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i24p6563-d461070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Overview of Dynamic Line Rating Combined with Other Flexibility Options from an Operational Point of View

Author

Listed:
  • F. Gülşen Erdinç

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electric-Electronics, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey)

  • Ozan Erdinç

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electric-Electronics, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey)

  • Recep Yumurtacı

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electric-Electronics, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey)

  • João P. S. Catalão

    (INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The need for flexibility in power system operation gradually increases regarding more renewable energy integration, load growth, etc., and the system operators already invest in this manner to enhance the power system operation. Besides, the power system has thermally sensitive assets such as lines, transformers, etc. that are normally operated under highly conservative static ratings. There is a growing trend in this regard to use the actual capacity of such assets dynamically under varying operating conditions leading to a dynamic thermal rating concept which is referred as dynamic line rating (DLR) approach specifically for lines. This study provides a comprehensive overview of existing perspectives on DLR and combination with other flexibility options from an operational point of view. Apart from the existing review studies more focused on implementation category of DLR concept, the concentration on more operational stage from the power system operation point of view leads the difference of this study compared to the mentioned studies. A categorization of the DLR implementation for either being sole or combined usage as a flexibility option is further realized. Besides, a geographically categorized analysis on existing practical evidence on DLR concept and implementations is also presented in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Gülşen Erdinç & Ozan Erdinç & Recep Yumurtacı & João P. S. Catalão, 2020. "A Comprehensive Overview of Dynamic Line Rating Combined with Other Flexibility Options from an Operational Point of View," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6563-:d:461070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banerjee, Binayak & Jayaweera, Dilan & Islam, Syed, 2015. "Risk constrained short-term scheduling with dynamic line ratings for increased penetration of wind power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1139-1146.
    2. Michiorri, Andrea & Nguyen, Huu-Minh & Alessandrini, Stefano & Bremnes, John Bjørnar & Dierer, Silke & Ferrero, Enrico & Nygaard, Bjørn-Egil & Pinson, Pierre & Thomaidis, Nikolaos & Uski, Sanna, 2015. "Forecasting for dynamic line rating," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1713-1730.
    3. Li, Yinxiao & Wang, Yi & Chen, Qixin, 2020. "Study on the impacts of meteorological factors on distributed photovoltaic accommodation considering dynamic line parameters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Jabarnejad, Masood & Valenzuela, Jorge, 2016. "Optimal investment plan for dynamic thermal rating using benders decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 917-929.
    5. Karimi, Soheila & Musilek, Petr & Knight, Andrew M., 2018. "Dynamic thermal rating of transmission lines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 600-612.
    6. Fernandez, E. & Albizu, I. & Bedialauneta, M.T. & Mazon, A.J. & Leite, P.T., 2016. "Review of dynamic line rating systems for wind power integration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 80-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Behzad Keyvani & Eoin Whelan & Eadaoin Doddy & Damian Flynn, 2023. "Indirect weather‐based approaches for increasing power transfer capabilities of electrical transmission networks," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), May.
    2. Jeff Laninga & Ali Nasr Esfahani & Gevindu Ediriweera & Nathan Jacob & Behzad Kordi, 2023. "Monitoring Technologies for HVDC Transmission Lines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Paolo Sospiro & Lohith Amarnath & Vincenzo Di Nardo & Giacomo Talluri & Foad H. Gandoman, 2021. "Smart Grid in China, EU, and the US: State of Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Glaum, Philipp & Hofmann, Fabian, 2023. "Leveraging the existing German transmission grid with dynamic line rating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    5. Teresa Nogueira & José Magano & Ezequiel Sousa & Gustavo R. Alves, 2021. "The Impacts of Battery Electric Vehicles on the Power Grid: A Monte Carlo Method Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Raquel Martinez & Mario Manana & Alberto Arroyo & Sergio Bustamante & Alberto Laso & Pablo Castro & Rafael Minguez, 2021. "Dynamic Rating Management of Overhead Transmission Lines Operating under Multiple Weather Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Diana Enescu & Pietro Colella & Angela Russo & Radu Florin Porumb & George Calin Seritan, 2021. "Concepts and Methods to Assess the Dynamic Thermal Rating of Underground Power Cables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Levente Rácz & Bálint Németh & Gábor Göcsei & Dimitar Zarchev & Valeri Mladenov, 2022. "Performance Analysis of a Dynamic Line Rating System Based on Project Experiences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, January.
    9. Ramitha Dissanayake & Akila Wijethunge & Janaka Wijayakulasooriya & Janaka Ekanayake, 2022. "Optimizing PV-Hosting Capacity with the Integrated Employment of Dynamic Line Rating and Voltage Regulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Yasir Yaqoob & Arjuna Marzuki & Ching-Ming Lai & Jiashen Teh, 2022. "Fuzzy Dynamic Thermal Rating System-Based Thermal Aging Model for Transmission Lines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glaum, Philipp & Hofmann, Fabian, 2023. "Leveraging the existing German transmission grid with dynamic line rating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    2. Karimi, Soheila & Musilek, Petr & Knight, Andrew M., 2018. "Dynamic thermal rating of transmission lines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 600-612.
    3. Phillips, Tyler & DeLeon, Rey & Senocak, Inanc, 2017. "Dynamic rating of overhead transmission lines over complex terrain using a large-eddy simulation paradigm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 380-389.
    4. Romain Dupin & Laura Cavalcante & Ricardo J. Bessa & Georges Kariniotakis & Andrea Michiorri, 2020. "Extreme Quantiles Dynamic Line Rating Forecasts and Application on Network Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Wang, Chong & Ju, Ping & Wu, Feng & Pan, Xueping & Wang, Zhaoyu, 2022. "A systematic review on power system resilience from the perspective of generation, network, and load," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Brooks, Adria E. & Lesieutre, Bernard C., 2022. "A locational marginal price for frequency balancing operations in regulation markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    7. Riba, Jordi-Roger & Santiago Bogarra, & Gómez-Pau, Álvaro & Moreno-Eguilaz, Manuel, 2020. "Uprating of transmission lines by means of HTLS conductors for a sustainable growth: Challenges, opportunities, and research needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Hui, Hongxun & Chen, Yulin & Yang, Shaohua & Zhang, Hongcai & Jiang, Tao, 2022. "Coordination control of distributed generators and load resources for frequency restoration in isolated urban microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    9. Diana Enescu & Pietro Colella & Angela Russo & Radu Florin Porumb & George Calin Seritan, 2021. "Concepts and Methods to Assess the Dynamic Thermal Rating of Underground Power Cables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Levente Rácz & Bálint Németh & Gábor Göcsei & Dimitar Zarchev & Valeri Mladenov, 2022. "Performance Analysis of a Dynamic Line Rating System Based on Project Experiences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, January.
    11. Bracale, Antonio & Carpinelli, Guido & De Falco, Pasquale, 2017. "A new finite mixture distribution and its expectation-maximization procedure for extreme wind speed characterization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1366-1377.
    12. Math H. J. Bollen & Sarah K. Rönnberg, 2017. "Hosting Capacity of the Power Grid for Renewable Electricity Production and New Large Consumption Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, September.
    13. Shamsul Fahmi Mohd Nor & Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab Kadir & Azrul Mohd Ariffin & Miszaina Osman & Muhammad Syahmi Abd Rahman & Noorlina Mohd Zainuddin, 2021. "Issues and Challenges in Voltage Uprating for Sustainable Power Operation: A Case Study of a 132 kV Transmission Line System in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Abedi, Amin & Romerio, Franco, 2020. "Multi-period vulnerability analysis of power grids under multiple outages: An AC-based bilevel optimization approach," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    15. Gian Marco Paldino & Fabrizio De Caro & Jacopo De Stefani & Alfredo Vaccaro & Domenico Villacci & Gianluca Bontempi, 2022. "A Digital Twin Approach for Improving Estimation Accuracy in Dynamic Thermal Rating of Transmission Lines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Manisha Sawant & Sameer Thakare & A. Prabhakara Rao & Andrés E. Feijóo-Lorenzo & Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde, 2021. "A Review on State-of-the-Art Reviews in Wind-Turbine- and Wind-Farm-Related Topics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    17. José Agüero-Rubio & Javier López-Martínez & Marta Gómez-Galán & Ángel-Jesús Callejón-Ferre, 2020. "A Didactic Procedure to Solve the Equation of Steady-Static Response in Suspended Cables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Zhao Liu & Honglei Deng & Ruidong Peng & Xiangyang Peng & Rui Wang & Wencheng Zheng & Pengyu Wang & Deming Guo & Gang Liu, 2020. "An Equivalent Heat Transfer Model Instead of Wind Speed Measuring for Dynamic Thermal Rating of Transmission Lines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Pinto, Mauro S.S. & Miranda, Vladimiro & Saavedra, Osvaldo R., 2016. "Risk and unit commitment decisions in scenarios of wind power uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 550-558.
    20. Aouss Gabash, 2023. "Energy Market Transition and Climate Change: A Review of TSOs-DSOs C+++ Framework from 1800 to Present," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6563-:d:461070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.