IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v248y2016i3p917-929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal investment plan for dynamic thermal rating using benders decomposition

Author

Listed:
  • Jabarnejad, Masood
  • Valenzuela, Jorge

Abstract

The dynamic thermal rating is a new technology that utilizes the capacity of power transmission lines based on the ambient factors and the line condition. It usually offers higher thermal capacity than the traditional static rating. We propose a multi-stage mixed integer programming model and find the optimal investment plan for the dynamic ratings using benders decomposition. The investment plan includes when and which line should be upgraded to dynamic rating and which line should be switched out of service. The problem is decomposed into a master problem and three sub-problems. The master problem explores the candidate lines for both the investment plan and the switching plan, throughout the planning horizon. The sub-problems evaluate the proposed plans in terms of unmet demand and generation cost. Generation and transmission contingencies are also included in the model. We use our model on Garver’s system and IEEE 118-bus power systems to demonstrate our solution approach. We conduct sensitivity analyses and study the uncertainty in real-time thermal ratings, loads, and the discounting rate. Our studies show that the utilization of the dynamic ratings and the practice of transmission switching are complementary and can reduce the cost on the 118-bus system up to 30 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Jabarnejad, Masood & Valenzuela, Jorge, 2016. "Optimal investment plan for dynamic thermal rating using benders decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 917-929.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:248:y:2016:i:3:p:917-929
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715007274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Villumsen, J.C. & Philpott, A.B., 2012. "Investment in electricity networks with transmission switching," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 377-385.
    2. Ruiz, C. & Conejo, A.J., 2015. "Robust transmission expansion planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 390-401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glaum, Philipp & Hofmann, Fabian, 2023. "Leveraging the existing German transmission grid with dynamic line rating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    2. F. Gülşen Erdinç & Ozan Erdinç & Recep Yumurtacı & João P. S. Catalão, 2020. "A Comprehensive Overview of Dynamic Line Rating Combined with Other Flexibility Options from an Operational Point of View," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-30, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huppmann, Daniel & Egerer, Jonas, 2015. "National-strategic investment in European power transmission capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 191-203.
    2. Fang, Yiping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2017. "Optimizing power system investments and resilience against attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 161-173.
    3. Moreira, Alexandre & Pozo, David & Street, Alexandre & Sauma, Enzo & Strbac, Goran, 2021. "Climate‐aware generation and transmission expansion planning: A three‐stage robust optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1099-1118.
    4. Baringo, Luis & Boffino, Luigi & Oggioni, Giorgia, 2020. "Robust expansion planning of a distribution system with electric vehicles, storage and renewable units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    5. Grimm, Veronika & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2017. "Uniqueness of market equilibrium on a network: A peak-load pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 971-983.
    6. Antonio J. Conejo & Nicholas G. Hall & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Runhao Zhang, 2021. "Robust Capacity Planning for Project Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1533-1550, October.
    7. Ambrosius, M. & Egerer, J. & Grimm, V. & Weijde, A.H. van der, 2020. "Uncertain bidding zone configurations: The role of expectations for transmission and generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 343-359.
    8. Munoz, Francisco D. & van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Watson, Jean-Paul, 2017. "Does risk aversion affect transmission and generation planning? A Western North America case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 213-225.
    9. Zhang, Bingying & Li, Qiqiang & Wang, Luhao & Feng, Wei, 2018. "Robust optimization for energy transactions in multi-microgrids under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 346-360.
    10. Liu, Yuan & He, Li & Shen, Jing, 2017. "Optimization-based provincial hybrid renewable and non-renewable energy planning – A case study of Shanxi, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 839-856.
    11. Kramer, Anja & Krebs, Vanessa & Schmidt, Martin, 2021. "Strictly and Γ-robust counterparts of electricity market models: Perfect competition and Nash–Cournot equilibria," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    12. Riepin, Iegor & Schmidt, Matthew & Baringo, Luis & Müsgens, Felix, 2022. "Adaptive robust optimization for European strategic gas infrastructure planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    13. Grimm, Veronika & Martin, Alexander & Schmidt, Martin & Weibelzahl, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2016. "Transmission and generation investment in electricity markets: The effects of market splitting and network fee regimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 493-509.
    14. García-Cerezo, Álvaro & Baringo, Luis & García-Bertrand, Raquel, 2021. "Robust transmission network expansion planning considering non-convex operational constraints," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Ambrosius, M. & Egerer, J. & Grimm, V. & van der Weijde, A., 2019. "The role of expectations for market design – on structural regulatory uncertainty in electricity markets," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1943, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Chen, J.J. & Wu, Q.H. & Zhang, L.L. & Wu, P.Z., 2017. "Multi-objective mean–variance–skewness model for nonconvex and stochastic optimal power flow considering wind power and load uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 719-732.
    17. Bellè, Andrea & Abdin, Adam F. & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne, 2023. "A data-driven distributionally robust approach for the optimal coupling of interdependent critical infrastructures under random failures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 872-889.
    18. Ghaddar, Bissan & Jabr, Rabih A., 2019. "Power transmission network expansion planning: A semidefinite programming branch-and-bound approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 837-844.
    19. Gacitua, L. & Gallegos, P. & Henriquez-Auba, R. & Lorca, Á. & Negrete-Pincetic, M. & Olivares, D. & Valenzuela, A. & Wenzel, G., 2018. "A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 346-360.
    20. Burak Kocuk & Hyemin Jeon & Santanu S. Dey & Jeff Linderoth & James Luedtke & Xu Andy Sun, 2016. "A Cycle-Based Formulation and Valid Inequalities for DC Power Transmission Problems with Switching," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 922-938, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:248:y:2016:i:3:p:917-929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.