IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i24p6556-d460730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generic Dynamical Model of PEM Electrolyser under Intermittent Sources

Author

Listed:
  • Sumit Sood

    (CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

  • Om Prakash

    (CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

  • Mahdi Boukerdja

    (CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

  • Jean-Yves Dieulot

    (CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

  • Belkacem Ould-Bouamama

    (CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

  • Mathieu Bressel

    (CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Junia, 59000 Lille, France)

  • Anne-Lise Gehin

    (CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

Abstract

Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) water electrolysis system is one of the promising technologies to produce green hydrogen from renewable energy sources (wind and solar). However, performance and dynamic analysis of PEM water electrolysis systems are challenging due to the intermittent nature of such sources and involved multi-physical behaviour of the components and subsystems. This study proposes a generic dynamical model of the PEM electrolysis system represented in a modular fashion using Bond Graph (BG) as a unified modelling approach. Causal and functional properties of the BG facilitate the formal PEM electrolyser model to adapt and to fit the different configurations of the electrolyser ranging from laboratory scale to industrial scale. The system-specific key parameter values are identified optimally for a laboratory-scale electrolyser system running on a multi-source energy platform using experimental data. The mean absolute percentage error between simulation and experimental data is found to be less than 5%. The performance characteristic curves of the electrolyser are predicted at different operating temperatures using the identified key parameters. The predicted performance is in good agreement with the expected behaviour of the electrolyser found in the literature. The model also estimates the different energy losses and the real-time efficiency of the system under dynamic inputs. With these capabilities, the developed model provides an economical mean for design, control, and diagnosis development of such systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumit Sood & Om Prakash & Mahdi Boukerdja & Jean-Yves Dieulot & Belkacem Ould-Bouamama & Mathieu Bressel & Anne-Lise Gehin, 2020. "Generic Dynamical Model of PEM Electrolyser under Intermittent Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-34, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6556-:d:460730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6556/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6556/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent, Immanuel & Bessarabov, Dmitri, 2018. "Low cost hydrogen production by anion exchange membrane electrolysis: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1690-1704.
    2. Vincenzo Liso & Giorgio Savoia & Samuel Simon Araya & Giovanni Cinti & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2018. "Modelling and Experimental Analysis of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Water Electrolysis Cell at Different Operating Temperatures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Hernández-Gómez, Ángel & Ramirez, Victor & Guilbert, Damien & Saldivar, Belem, 2021. "Cell voltage static-dynamic modeling of a PEM electrolyzer based on adaptive parameters: Development and experimental validation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1508-1522.
    4. Olivier, Pierre & Bourasseau, Cyril & Bouamama, Pr. Belkacem, 2017. "Low-temperature electrolysis system modelling: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 280-300.
    5. Fabian Scheepers & Markus Stähler & Andrea Stähler & Edward Rauls & Martin Müller & Marcelo Carmo & Werner Lehnert, 2020. "Improving the Efficiency of PEM Electrolyzers through Membrane-Specific Pressure Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Genovese, Matteo & Fragiacomo, Petronilla, 2021. "Parametric technical-economic investigation of a pressurized hydrogen electrolyzer unit coupled with a storage compression system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 502-515.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makhsoos, Ashkan & Kandidayeni, Mohsen & Boulon, Loïc & Pollet, Bruno G., 2023. "A comparative analysis of single and modular proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers for green hydrogen production- a case study in Trois-Rivières," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Burin Yodwong & Damien Guilbert & Matheepot Phattanasak & Wattana Kaewmanee & Melika Hinaje & Gianpaolo Vitale, 2020. "Faraday’s Efficiency Modeling of a Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Based on Experimental Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Frank Gambou & Damien Guilbert & Michel Zasadzinski & Hugues Rafaralahy, 2022. "A Comprehensive Survey of Alkaline Electrolyzer Modeling: Electrical Domain and Specific Electrolyte Conductivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Ibrahim, Omar S. & Singlitico, Alessandro & Proskovics, Roberts & McDonagh, Shane & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D., 2022. "Dedicated large-scale floating offshore wind to hydrogen: Assessing design variables in proposed typologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Feriel Mustapha & Damien Guilbert & Mohammed El-Ganaoui, 2022. "Investigation of Electrical and Thermal Performance of a Commercial PEM Electrolyzer under Dynamic Solicitations," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Daniela S. Falcão, 2023. "Green Hydrogen Production by Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis: Status and Future Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-8, January.
    7. Taehyung Koo & Rockkil Ko & Dongwoo Ha & Jaeyoung Han, 2023. "Development of Model-Based PEM Water Electrolysis HILS (Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation) System for State Evaluation and Fault Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Scheepers, Fabian & Stähler, Markus & Stähler, Andrea & Rauls, Edward & Müller, Martin & Carmo, Marcelo & Lehnert, Werner, 2021. "Temperature optimization for improving polymer electrolyte membrane-water electrolysis system efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Bernd Emonts & Martin Müller & Michael Hehemann & Holger Janßen & Roger Keller & Markus Stähler & Andrea Stähler & Veit Hagenmeyer & Roland Dittmeyer & Peter Pfeifer & Simon Waczowicz & Michael Rubin , 2022. "A Holistic Consideration of Megawatt Electrolysis as a Key Component of Sector Coupling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Damien Guilbert & Gianpaolo Vitale, 2019. "Dynamic Emulation of a PEM Electrolyzer by Time Constant Based Exponential Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Yang, Rui & Mohamed, Amira & Kim, Kibum, 2023. "Optimal design and flow-field pattern selection of proton exchange membrane electrolyzers using artificial intelligence," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    12. Lu Wang & Zhijun Jin & Xiao Chen & Yutong Su & Xiaowei Huang, 2023. "The Origin and Occurrence of Natural Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Chanda, Debabrata & Ma, Ming & Aili, David & Demissie, Taye Beyene & Vaes, Jan & Li, Qingfeng & Liu, Shanhu & Pant, Deepak, 2020. "Towards highly efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction: Cell designs, membranes and electrocatalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    14. Hou, Xiaojiang & Wang, Yi & Yang, Yanling & Hu, Rui & Yang, Guang & Feng, Lei & Suo, Guoquan, 2019. "Microstructure evolution and controlled hydrolytic hydrogen generation strategy of Mg-rich Mg-Ni-La ternary alloys," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Choe, Changgwon & Cheon, Seunghyun & Gu, Jiwon & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Critical aspect of renewable syngas production for power-to-fuel via solid oxide electrolysis: Integrative assessment for potential renewable energy source," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Jang, Dohyung & Cho, Hyun-Seok & Kang, Sanggyu, 2021. "Numerical modeling and analysis of the effect of pressure on the performance of an alkaline water electrolysis system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    17. Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael & Caglayan, Dilara Gulcin & Ortiz, Alfredo & Heinrichs, Heidi & Robinius, Martin & Stolten, Detlef & Ortiz, Inmaculada, 2021. "Power-to-Ships: Future electricity and hydrogen demands for shipping on the Atlantic coast of Europe in 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Liu, Hongwei & Ren, He & Gu, Yajing & Lin, Yonggang & Hu, Weifei & Song, Jiajun & Yang, Jinhong & Zhu, Zengxin & Li, Wei, 2023. "Design and on-site implementation of an off-grid marine current powered hydrogen production system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    19. Xiaohua Wang & Andrew G. Star & Rajesh K. Ahluwalia, 2023. "Performance of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Water Electrolysis Systems: Configuration, Stack Materials, Turndown and Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Sedlar, D. Karasalihović & Vulin, D. & Krajačić, G. & Jukić, L., 2019. "Offshore gas production infrastructure reutilisation for blue energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 159-174.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6556-:d:460730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.