IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i23p6277-d452856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Economic Assessments and Uncertainties of Multiple Lignocellulosic Biomass Utilization for Bioenergy Products: Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxi Wang

    (Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Jingxin Wang

    (Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Xufeng Zhang

    (Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Shawn Grushecky

    (Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

Abstract

Life-cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) were applied to assess the economic feasibility and environmental benefits of utilizing multiple biomass feedstocks for bioenergy products under three different technological pathways with consideration of uncertainties. Three cases were studied for the production of pellets, biomass-based electricity, and pyrolysis bio-oil. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to examine the uncertainties of fossil energy consumption, bioenergy conversion efficiency, stochastic production rate, etc. The cradle-to-gate LCA results showed that pellet production had the lowest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water and fossil fuels consumption (8.29 kg CO 2 eq (equivalent), 0.46 kg, and 105.42 MJ, respectively). The conversion process presented a greater environmental impact for all three bioenergy products. When producing 46,929 Mg of pellets, 223,380 MWh of electricity, and 78,000 barrels of pyrolysis oil, the net present values (NPV) indicated that only pellet and electricity production were profitable with NPVs of $1.20 million for pellets, and $5.59 million for biopower. Uncertainty analysis indicated that pellet production showed the highest uncertainty in GHG emission, and bio-oil production had the least uncertainty in GHG emission but had risks producing greater-than-normal amounts of GHG. Biopower production had the highest probability to be a profitable investment with 85.23%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxi Wang & Jingxin Wang & Xufeng Zhang & Shawn Grushecky, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Assessments and Uncertainties of Multiple Lignocellulosic Biomass Utilization for Bioenergy Products: Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6277-:d:452856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puri, Munish & Abraham, Reinu E. & Barrow, Colin J., 2012. "Biofuel production: Prospects, challenges and feedstock in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6022-6031.
    2. Wang, Yuxi & Wang, Jingxin & Schuler, Jamie & Hartley, Damon & Volk, Timothy & Eisenbies, Mark, 2020. "Optimization of harvest and logistics for multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks in the northeastern United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Liu, Weiguo & Wang, Jingxin & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu & Jiang, Yuan & DeVallance, David, 2017. "Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 76-86.
    4. Kandaramath Hari, Thushara & Yaakob, Zahira & Binitha, Narayanan N., 2015. "Aviation biofuel from renewable resources: Routes, opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1234-1244.
    5. Jagannathan, Ravi & Matsa, David A. & Meier, Iwan & Tarhan, Vefa, 2016. "Why do firms use high discount rates?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 445-463.
    6. Mobini, Mahdi & Sowlati, Taraneh & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2011. "Forest biomass supply logistics for a power plant using the discrete-event simulation approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1241-1250, April.
    7. Lehto, Jani & Oasmaa, Anja & Solantausta, Yrjö & Kytö, Matti & Chiaramonti, David, 2014. "Review of fuel oil quality and combustion of fast pyrolysis bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 178-190.
    8. Naik, S.N. & Goud, Vaibhav V. & Rout, Prasant K. & Dalai, Ajay K., 2010. "Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 578-597, February.
    9. Bartolomeus Häussling Löwgren & Joris Weigert & Erik Esche & Jens-Uwe Repke, 2020. "Uncertainty Analysis for Data-Driven Chance-Constrained Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Rasheed, Rizwan & Khan, Naghman & Yasar, Abdullah & Su, Yuehong & Tabinda, Amtul Bari, 2016. "Design and cost-benefit analysis of a novel anaerobic industrial bioenergy plant in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 242-247.
    11. Long Nguyen & Kara G. Cafferty & Erin M. Searcy & Sabrina Spatari, 2014. "Uncertainties in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Advanced Biomass Feedstock Logistics Supply Chains in Kansas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamil Roman & Michał Roman & Dominika Szadkowska & Jan Szadkowski & Emilia Grzegorzewska, 2021. "Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Parameters According to Energetic Willow ( Salix viminalis L.) Cultivation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Algirdas Jasinskas & Vytautas Kleiza & Dionizas Streikus & Rolandas Domeika & Edvardas Vaiciukevičius & Gvidas Gramauskas & Marvin T. Valentin, 2022. "Assessment of Quality Indicators of Pressed Biofuel Produced from Coarse Herbaceous Plants and Determination of the Influence of Moisture on the Properties of Pellets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Yulei Gao & Jikang Jiang & Zheng Shen & Xu Zhang & Lingjie Zeng & Xiaolu Shao, 2021. "Lifecycle Assessment of a Non-Phase-Transition Drying Pyrolysis and Mass Conversion Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Rita Petlickaitė & Algirdas Jasinskas & Ramūnas Mieldažys & Kęstutis Romaneckas & Marius Praspaliauskas & Jovita Balandaitė, 2022. "Investigation of Pressed Solid Biofuel Produced from Multi-Crop Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Mariusz Tańczuk & Wojciech Kostowski, 2021. "Technical, Energetic and Economic Optimization Analysis of Selection of Heat Source for Municipal Sewage Sludge Dryer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Jenny Frank & Obste Therasme & Timothy A. Volk & Tristan Brown & Robert W. Malmsheimer & Marie-Odile Fortier & Mark H. Eisenbies & HakSoo Ha & Justin Heavey, 2022. "Integrated Stochastic Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis for Shrub Willow Production in the Northeastern United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Elias Martinez-Hernandez & Myriam A. Amezcua-Allieri & Jorge Aburto, 2021. "Assessing the Cost of Biomass and Bioenergy Production in Agroindustrial Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azad, A.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Sharma, Subhash C. & Mofijur, M. & Bhuiya, M.M.K., 2016. "Prospects, feedstocks and challenges of biodiesel production from beauty leaf oil and castor oil: A nonedible oil sources in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 302-318.
    2. Gutiérrez-Antonio, C. & Gómez-Castro, F.I. & de Lira-Flores, J.A. & Hernández, S., 2017. "A review on the production processes of renewable jet fuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 709-729.
    3. Santos, Andreia & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & Marques, Alexandra & Amorim, Pedro, 2019. "Assessment and optimization of sustainable forest wood supply chains – A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-135.
    4. Azad, A.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Sharma, Subhash C. & Hazrat, M.A., 2015. "Prospect of biofuels as an alternative transport fuel in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 331-351.
    5. Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Siddiqui, M.T.H. & Mubarak, N.M. & Mazari, Shaukat & Griffin, G.J. & Srinivasan, M.P., 2020. "Co-liquefaction of synthetic polyethylene and polyethylene bags with sugarcane bagasse under supercritical conditions: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 2397-2407.
    6. Azad, A.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Sharma, Subhash C. & Bhuiya, M.M.K., 2016. "Recent development of biodiesel combustion strategies and modelling for compression ignition engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1068-1086.
    7. Filimonau, Viachaslau & Högström, Michaela, 2017. "The attitudes of UK tourists to the use of biofuels in civil aviation: An exploratory study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 84-94.
    8. Seyed Hashem Mousavi-Avval & Sami Khanal & Ajay Shah, 2023. "Assessment of Potential Pennycress Availability and Suitable Sites for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Refineries in Ohio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Shemfe, Mobolaji B. & Whittaker, Carly & Gu, Sai & Fidalgo, Beatriz, 2016. "Comparative evaluation of GHG emissions from the use of Miscanthus for bio-hydrocarbon production via fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 22-33.
    10. Kosinkova, Jana & Doshi, Amar & Maire, Juliette & Ristovski, Zoran & Brown, Richard & Rainey, Thomas J., 2015. "Measuring the regional availability of biomass for biofuels and the potential for microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1271-1285.
    11. Joshi, Girdhar & Pandey, Jitendra K. & Rana, Sravendra & Rawat, Devendra S., 2017. "Challenges and opportunities for the application of biofuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 850-866.
    12. Ahmed, Ashfaq & Abu Bakar, Muhammad S. & Azad, Abul K. & Sukri, Rahayu S. & Mahlia, Teuku Meurah Indra, 2018. "Potential thermochemical conversion of bioenergy from Acacia species in Brunei Darussalam: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3060-3076.
    13. Avelino Gonçalves, Fabiano & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro, 2015. "Use of cultivars of low cost, agroindustrial and urban waste in the production of cellulosic ethanol in Brazil: A proposal to utilization of microdistillery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1287-1303.
    14. Giwa, Adewale & Adeyemi, Idowu & Dindi, Abdallah & Lopez, Celia García-Baños & Lopresto, Catia Giovanna & Curcio, Stefano & Chakraborty, Sudip, 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of the sustainability of an integrated biorefinery from microalgae and Jatropha: A review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 239-257.
    15. Raud, M. & Kikas, T. & Sippula, O. & Shurpali, N.J., 2019. "Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 44-56.
    16. Jagtap, Sharad P. & Pawar, Anand N. & Lahane, Subhash, 2020. "Improving the usability of biodiesel blend in low heat rejection diesel engine through combustion, performance and emission analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 628-644.
    17. Bharathiraja, B. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Sudharsanaa, T. & Bharghavi, A. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chakravarthy, M. & Yuvaraj, D., 2017. "Biobutanol – An impending biofuel for future: A review on upstream and downstream processing tecniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 788-807.
    18. Mao, Guozhu & Zou, Hongyang & Chen, Guanyi & Du, Huibin & Zuo, Jian, 2015. "Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1823-1833.
    19. Luo, Li & O'Hehir, Jim & Regan, Courtney M. & Meng, Li & Connor, Jeffery D. & Chow, Christopher W.K., 2021. "An integrated strategic and tactical optimization model for forest supply chain planning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6277-:d:452856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.