IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i17p4336-d402286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conceptual Framework to Describe Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew J. Satchwell

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Peter A. Cappers

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Jeff Deason

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Sydney P. Forrester

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Natalie Mims Frick

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Brian F. Gerke

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Mary Ann Piette

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

Abstract

Energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) resources provide important utility systems and ratepayer benefits. At the same time, the rapid change in the amount and type of variable renewable energy, like solar and wind, is reshaping the role and economic value of EE and DR, and will likely affect the time-dependent valuation of EE and DR measures. Utilities are increasingly interested in integrating EE and DR measures as a strategic approach to improve their collective cost-effectiveness and performance. We develop a framework to identify the EE and DR attributes, system conditions, and technological factors that are likely to drive interactions between EE and DR. We apply the framework to example measures with different technology specifics in the context of different utility system conditions. We find that EE and DR interactions are likely driven by changes in discretionary load, the addition of controls or other capabilities to shift loads, and the coincidence of savings with system peak or load building periods. Our analysis suggests increasing complexity in evaluating EE and DR interactions when moving from standalone equipment to integrated systems. The framework can be applied to research on integrated building systems by grouping measures into portfolios with different likely implications for EE and DR interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew J. Satchwell & Peter A. Cappers & Jeff Deason & Sydney P. Forrester & Natalie Mims Frick & Brian F. Gerke & Mary Ann Piette, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Describe Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Interactions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4336-:d:402286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joung, Manho & Kim, Jinho, 2013. "Assessing demand response and smart metering impacts on long-term electricity market prices and system reliability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 441-448.
    2. Faruqui, Ahmad & Hledik, Ryan & Newell, Sam & Pfeifenberger, Hannes, 2007. "The Power of 5 Percent," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 68-77, October.
    3. Judson Boomhower & Lucas Davis, 2020. "Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver at the Right Time?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 115-139, January.
    4. Toshi H. Arimura, Shanjun Li, Richard G. Newell, and Karen Palmer, 2012. "Cost-Effectiveness of Electricity Energy Efficiency Programs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    5. Wang, Fei & Xu, Hanchen & Xu, Ti & Li, Kangping & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João. P.S., 2017. "The values of market-based demand response on improving power system reliability under extreme circumstances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 220-231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrews, Abigail & Jain, Rishee K., 2022. "Beyond Energy Efficiency: A clustering approach to embed demand flexibility into building energy benchmarking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    2. Bożena Babiarz & Władysław Szymański, 2020. "Introduction to the Dynamics of Heat Transfer in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Daniele Menniti & Anna Pinnarelli & Nicola Sorrentino & Fiorella Stella & Caterina Aura & Claudia Liutic & Gaetano Polizzi, 2022. "A Tool to Assess the Interaction between Energy Efficiency, Demand Response, and Power System Reliability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Alex Ximenes Naves & Laureano Jiménez Esteller & Assed Naked Haddad & Dieter Boer, 2021. "Targeting Energy Efficiency through Air Conditioning Operational Modes for Residential Buildings in Tropical Climates, Assisted by Solar Energy and Thermal Energy Storage. Case Study Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-29, November.
    5. Munankarmi, Prateek & Maguire, Jeff & Balamurugan, Sivasathya Pradha & Blonsky, Michael & Roberts, David & Jin, Xin, 2021. "Community-scale interaction of energy efficiency and demand flexibility in residential buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Zhe & Hong, SeungHo & Ding, YueMin, 2019. "A data mining-driven incentive-based demand response scheme for a virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 549-559.
    2. Märkle-Huß, Joscha & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2018. "Large-scale demand response and its implications for spot prices, load and policies: Insights from the German-Austrian electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1290-1298.
    3. Zeng, Bo & Wei, Xuan & Zhao, Dongbo & Singh, Chanan & Zhang, Jianhua, 2018. "Hybrid probabilistic-possibilistic approach for capacity credit evaluation of demand response considering both exogenous and endogenous uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 186-200.
    4. Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Javier Garrido & Fernando Rueda-Martinez & Gerardo Alcalá & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2019. "Wind Power Cogeneration to Reduce Peak Electricity Demand in Mexican States Along the Gulf of Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Dong, Jun & Xue, Guiyuan & Li, Rong, 2016. "Demand response in China: Regulations, pilot projects and recommendations – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 13-27.
    6. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Jenya Kahn-Lang, 2016. "The Effects of Electric Utility Decoupling on Energy Efficiency," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    8. Papineau, Maya, 2017. "Setting the standard? A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of building energy standards," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 63-76.
    9. Dehnavi, Ehsan & Abdi, Hamdi, 2016. "Optimal pricing in time of use demand response by integrating with dynamic economic dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1086-1094.
    10. Neda Hajibandeh & Mehdi Ehsan & Soodabeh Soleymani & Miadreza Shafie-khah & João P. S. Catalão, 2017. "The Mutual Impact of Demand Response Programs and Renewable Energies: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Derakhshan, Ghasem & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali & Kazemi, Ahad, 2016. "The optimization of demand response programs in smart grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 295-306.
    12. Kwag, Hyung-Geun & Kim, Jin-O, 2014. "Reliability modeling of demand response considering uncertainty of customer behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 24-33.
    13. Raatikainen, Mika & Skön, Jukka-Pekka & Leiviskä, Kauko & Kolehmainen, Mikko, 2016. "Intelligent analysis of energy consumption in school buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 416-429.
    14. Dallas Burtraw & Josh Linn & Karen Palmer & Anthony Paul, 2014. "The Costs and Consequences of Clean Air Act Regulation of CO2 from Power Plants," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 557-562, May.
    15. Akhter, Muhammad Naveed & Mekhilef, Saad & Mokhlis, Hazlie & Ali, Raza & Usama, Muhammad & Muhammad, Munir Azam & Khairuddin, Anis Salwa Mohd, 2022. "A hybrid deep learning method for an hour ahead power output forecasting of three different photovoltaic systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    16. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "The Effect of Renewable Energy Development on Carbon Emission Reduction: An Empirical Analysis for the EU-15 Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 7989, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Palmer, Karen & Walls, Margaret, 2015. "Does Information Provision Shrink the Energy Efficiency Gap? A Cross-City Comparison of Commercial Building Benchmarking and Disclosure Laws," RFF Working Paper Series dp-15-12, Resources for the Future.
    18. Noah Kaufman & Eleanor Krause, 2017. "The Economic Impacts of the Clean Power Plan: How Studies of the Same Regulation can Produce such Different Results," Working Papers id:11927, eSocialSciences.
    19. Bergaentzlé, Claire & Clastres, Cédric & Khalfallah, Haikel, 2014. "Demand-side management and European environmental and energy goals: An optimal complementary approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 858-869.
    20. Máximo A. Domínguez-Garabitos & Víctor S. Ocaña-Guevara & Félix Santos-García & Adriana Arango-Manrique & Miguel Aybar-Mejía, 2022. "A Methodological Proposal for Implementing Demand-Shifting Strategies in the Wholesale Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4336-:d:402286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.