IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i4p554-d96095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Unified Trading Model Based on Robust Optimization for Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets with Wind Power Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Yuewen Jiang

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China)

  • Meisen Chen

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China)

  • Shi You

    (Energy System Operation and Management, Center for Electric Power and Energy, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

In a conventional electricity market, trading is conducted based on power forecasts in the day-ahead market, while the power imbalance is regulated in the real-time market, which is a separate trading scheme. With large-scale wind power connected into the power grid, power forecast errors increase in the day-ahead market which lowers the economic efficiency of the separate trading scheme. This paper proposes a robust unified trading model that includes the forecasts of real-time prices and imbalance power into the day-ahead trading scheme. The model is developed based on robust optimization in view of the undefined probability distribution of clearing prices of the real-time market. For the model to be used efficiently, an improved quantum-behaved particle swarm algorithm (IQPSO) is presented in the paper based on an in-depth analysis of the limitations of the static character of quantum-behaved particle swarm algorithm (QPSO). Finally, the impacts of associated parameters on the separate trading and unified trading model are analyzed to verify the superiority of the proposed model and algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuewen Jiang & Meisen Chen & Shi You, 2017. "A Unified Trading Model Based on Robust Optimization for Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets with Wind Power Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:554-:d:96095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Chunyu & Ding, Yi & Xydis, George & Wang, Jianhui & Østergaard, Jacob, 2015. "Review of real-time electricity markets for integrating Distributed Energy Resources and Demand Response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 695-706.
    3. Hao Bai & Shihong Miao & Xiaohong Ran & Chang Ye, 2015. "Optimal Dispatch Strategy of a Virtual Power Plant Containing Battery Switch Stations in a Unified Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Farahmand, H. & Doorman, G.L., 2012. "Balancing market integration in the Northern European continent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 316-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriella Ferruzzi & Giorgio Graditi & Federico Rossi, 2020. "A joint approach for strategic bidding of a microgrid in energy and spinning reserve markets," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(1), pages 88-115, February.
    2. Wafa Nafkha-Tayari & Seifeddine Ben Elghali & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2022. "Virtual Power Plants Optimization Issue: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Solutions, and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Jianwen Ren & Yingqiang Xu & Shiyuan Wang, 2018. "A Distributed Robust Dispatch Approach for Interconnected Systems with a High Proportion of Wind Power Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    5. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    6. Stefan Mišković, 2017. "A VNS-LP algorithm for the robust dynamic maximal covering location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1011-1033, October.
    7. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Li, Shukai & Liu, Ronghui & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2019. "Robust dynamic bus controls considering delay disturbances and passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 88-109.
    9. Chassein, André & Dokka, Trivikram & Goerigk, Marc, 2019. "Algorithms and uncertainty sets for data-driven robust shortest path problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 671-686.
    10. Akhtar Hussain & Van-Hai Bui & Hak-Man Kim, 2016. "Robust Optimization-Based Scheduling of Multi-Microgrids Considering Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. M. J. Naderi & M. S. Pishvaee, 2017. "Robust bi-objective macroscopic municipal water supply network redesign and rehabilitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2689-2711, July.
    12. Kandpal, Bakul & Pareek, Parikshit & Verma, Ashu, 2022. "A robust day-ahead scheduling strategy for EV charging stations in unbalanced distribution grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    13. Jun-ya Gotoh & Michael Jong Kim & Andrew E. B. Lim, 2020. "Worst-case sensitivity," Papers 2010.10794, arXiv.org.
    14. Guo, Shiliang & Li, Pengpeng & Ma, Kai & Yang, Bo & Yang, Jie, 2022. "Robust energy management for industrial microgrid considering charging and discharging pressure of electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    15. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Robust optimization on redundancy allocation problems in multi-state and continuous-state series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    16. Evers, L. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Barros, A.I. & Monsuur, H., 2011. "Robust UAV Mission Planning," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2011-07, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    17. Shen, Feifei & Zhao, Liang & Wang, Meihong & Du, Wenli & Qian, Feng, 2022. "Data-driven adaptive robust optimization for energy systems in ethylene plant under demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    18. Baringo, Luis & Boffino, Luigi & Oggioni, Giorgia, 2020. "Robust expansion planning of a distribution system with electric vehicles, storage and renewable units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    19. Mohammad Reza Ghatreh Samani & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh, 2021. "A robust framework for designing blood network in disaster relief: a real-life case," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1529-1568, September.
    20. Thomas Schmitt & Tobias Rodemann & Jürgen Adamy, 2021. "The Cost of Photovoltaic Forecasting Errors in Microgrid Control with Peak Pricing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:554-:d:96095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.