IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i2p211-d90156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Biomass: Process Design, Modeling, Energy Efficiency and Cost Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Lucian

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Luca Fiori

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

In this paper, a hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process is designed and modeled on the basis of experimental data previously obtained for two representative organic waste materials: off-specification compost and grape marc. The process accounts for all the steps and equipment necessary to convert raw moist biomass into dry and pelletized hydrochar. By means of mass and thermal balances and based on common equations specific to the various equipment, thermal energy and power consumption were calculated at variable process conditions: HTC reactor temperature T: 180, 220, 250 °C; reaction time θ: 1, 3, 8 h. When operating the HTC plant with grape marc (65% moisture content) at optimized process conditions (T = 220 °C; θ = 1 h; dry biomass to water ratio = 0.19), thermal energy and power consumption were equal to 1170 kWh and 160 kWh per ton of hydrochar produced, respectively. Correspondingly, plant efficiency was 78%. In addition, the techno-economical aspects of the HTC process were analyzed in detail, considering both investment and production costs. The production cost of pelletized hydrochar and its break-even point were determined to be 157 €/ton and 200 €/ton, respectively. Such values make the use of hydrochar as a CO 2 neutral biofuel attractive.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Lucian & Luca Fiori, 2017. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Biomass: Process Design, Modeling, Energy Efficiency and Cost Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:211-:d:90156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/2/211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/2/211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volpe, Roberto & Messineo, Antonio & Millan, Marcos & Volpe, Maurizio & Kandiyoti, Rafael, 2015. "Assessment of olive wastes as energy source: pyrolysis, torrefaction and the key role of H loss in thermal breakdown," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 119-127.
    2. Antonio Messineo & Roberto Volpe & Francesco Asdrubali, 2012. "Evaluation of Net Energy Obtainable from Combustion of Stabilised Olive Mill By-Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Ramy Gamgoum & Animesh Dutta & Rafael M. Santos & Yi Wai Chiang, 2016. "Hydrothermal Conversion of Neutral Sulfite Semi-Chemical Red Liquor into Hydrochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Volpe & Simona Messineo & Maurizio Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2015. "Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Guizani, Chamseddine & Haddad, Khouloud & Jeguirim, Mejdi & Colin, Baptiste & Limousy, Lionel, 2016. "Combustion characteristics and kinetics of torrefied olive pomace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 453-463.
    3. Vincenzo Franzitta & Domenico Curto & Davide Rao, 2016. "Energetic Sustainability Using Renewable Energies in the Mediterranean Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Dhananjay Bhatt & Ankita Shrestha & Raj Kumar Dahal & Bishnu Acharya & Prabir Basu & Richard MacEwen, 2018. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biosolids from Waste Water Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Francesco Asdrubali & Franco Cotana & Federico Rossi & Andrea Presciutti & Antonella Rotili & Claudia Guattari, 2015. "Life Cycle Assessment of New Oxy-Fuels from Biodiesel-Derived Glycerol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Christoforou, Elias A. & Fokaides, Paris A., 2016. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of olive husk torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 257-266.
    7. Isaac Lorero & Arturo J. Vizcaíno & Francisco J. Alguacil & Félix A. López, 2020. "Activated Carbon from Winemaking Waste: Thermoeconomic Analysis for Large-Scale Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Maurizio Volpe & Carmelo D'Anna & Simona Messineo & Roberto Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2014. "Sustainable Production of Bio-Combustibles from Pyrolysis of Agro-Industrial Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Bide Zhang & Mohammad Heidari & Bharat Regmi & Shakirudeen Salaudeen & Precious Arku & Mahendra Thimmannagari & Animesh Dutta, 2018. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Fruit Wastes: A Promising Technique for Generating Hydrochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Valentín Molina-Moreno & Pedro Núñez-Cacho Utrilla & Francisco J. Cortés-García & Antonio Peña-García, 2018. "The Use of Led Technology and Biomass to Power Public Lighting in a Local Context: The Case of Baeza (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    11. Mauro De Marchis & Barbara Milici & Roberto Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2016. "Energy Saving in Water Distribution Network through Pump as Turbine Generators: Economic and Environmental Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Franco Cotana & Antonio Messineo & Alessandro Petrozzi & Valentina Coccia & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Andrea Aquino, 2014. "Comparison of ORC Turbine and Stirling Engine to Produce Electricity from Gasified Poultry Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Barskov, Stan & Zappi, Mark & Buchireddy, Prashanth & Dufreche, Stephen & Guillory, John & Gang, Daniel & Hernandez, Rafael & Bajpai, Rakesh & Baudier, Jeff & Cooper, Robbyn & Sharp, Richard, 2019. "Torrefaction of biomass: A review of production methods for biocoal from cultured and waste lignocellulosic feedstocks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 624-642.
    14. Vincenzo Franzitta & Domenico Curto & Daniele Milone & Alessia Viola, 2016. "The Desalination Process Driven by Wave Energy: A Challenge for the Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Kim, Seok Jun & Park, Sunyong & Oh, Kwang Cheol & Ju, Young Min & Cho, La hoon & Kim, Dae Hyun, 2021. "Development of surface torrefaction process to utilize agro-byproducts as an energy source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Xin, Shanzhi & Mi, Tie & Liu, Xiaoye & Huang, Fang, 2018. "Effect of torrefaction on the pyrolysis characteristics of high moisture herbaceous residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 586-593.
    17. Kandasamy, Sabariswaran & Zhang, Bo & He, Zhixia & Chen, Haitao & Feng, Huan & Wang, Qian & Wang, Bin & Ashokkumar, Veeramuthu & Siva, Subramanian & Bhuvanendran, Narayanamoorthy & Krishnamoorthi, M., 2020. "Effect of low-temperature catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina platensis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    18. Wilk, Małgorzata & Magdziarz, Aneta & Kalemba, Izabela, 2015. "Characterisation of renewable fuels' torrefaction process with different instrumental techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 259-269.
    19. Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2020. "Torrefied Biomass as an Alternative in Coal-Fueled Power Plants: A Case Study on Grindability of Agroforestry Waste Forms," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Heidari, Mohammad & Salaudeen, Shakirudeen & Arku, Precious & Acharya, Bishnu & Tasnim, Syeda & Dutta, Animesh, 2021. "Development of a mathematical model for hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: Comparison of experimental measurements with model predictions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:211-:d:90156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.