IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i12p2119-d122746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential of Tropical Fruit Waste Biomass for Production of Bio-Briquette Fuel: Using Indonesia as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Brunerová

    (Department of Material Science and Manufacturing Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Hynek Roubík

    (Department of Sustainable Technologies, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Milan Brožek

    (Department of Material Science and Manufacturing Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • David Herák

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Šleger

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jana Mazancová

    (Department of Sustainable Technologies, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Within developing countries, there is an appeal to use waste biomass for energy generation in the form of bio-briquettes. This study investigated the potential use of bio-briquettes that are produced from the waste biomass of the following tropical fruits: durian ( Durio zibethinus ), coconut ( Cocos nucifera ), coffee ( Coffea arabica ), cacao ( Theobroma cacao ), banana ( Musa acuminata ) and rambutan ( Nephelium lappaceum ). All fruit waste biomass samples exhibited an extremely high level of initial moisture content (78.22% in average). Fruit samples with the highest proportion of fruit waste biomass (of total unprocessed fruit mass) were represented by cacao (83.82%), durian (62.56%) and coconut (56.83%). Highest energy potentials (calorific value) of fruit waste biomass were observed in case of coconut (18.22 MJ∙kg −1 ), banana (17.79 MJ∙kg −1 ) and durian (17.60 MJ∙kg −1 ) fruit samples, whereas fruit waste biomass with the lowest level of ash content originated from the rambutan (3.67%), coconut (4.52%), and durian (5.05%) fruit samples. When investigating the energy demands to produce bio-briquettes from such feedstock materials, the best results (lowest amount of required deformation energy in combination with highest level of bio-briquette bulk density) were achieved by the rambutan, durian and banana fruit waste biomass samples. Finally, all investigated bio-briquette samples presented satisfactory levels of bulk density (>1050 kg∙m −3 ). In conclusion, our results indicated the practicability and viability of such bio-briquette fuel production, as well as supporting the fact that bio-briquettes from tropical fruit waste biomass can offer a potentially attractive energy source with many benefits, especially in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Brunerová & Hynek Roubík & Milan Brožek & David Herák & Vladimír Šleger & Jana Mazancová, 2017. "Potential of Tropical Fruit Waste Biomass for Production of Bio-Briquette Fuel: Using Indonesia as an Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:2119-:d:122746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2119/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2119/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brand, Martha Andreia & Jacinto, Rodolfo Cardoso & Antunes, Rodrigo & da Cunha, Alexsandro Bayestorff, 2017. "Production of briquettes as a tool to optimize the use of waste from rice cultivation and industrial processing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 116-123.
    2. Maria Angeles Garrido & Juan A. Conesa & Maria Dolores Garcia, 2017. "Characterization and Production of Fuel Briquettes Made from Biomass and Plastic Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Costa, A.O. & Oliveira, L.B. & Lins, M.P.E. & Silva, A.C.M. & Araujo, M.S.M. & Pereira Jr., A.O. & Rosa, L.P., 2013. "Sustainability analysis of biodiesel production: A review on different resources in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 407-412.
    4. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Md Din, Mohd Fadhil & Kamaruddin, Siti Fatimah & Taib, Shazwin Mat & Singh, Lakhveer & Yong, Ee Ling & Dahalan, Farrah Aini, 2016. "Evaluation of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) as a potential raw material source for briquette production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 768-773.
    5. Singh, Rajbeer & Setiawan, Andri D., 2013. "Biomass energy policies and strategies: Harvesting potential in India and Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 332-345.
    6. Guo, Mingxin & Song, Weiping & Buhain, Jeremy, 2015. "Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 712-725.
    7. Michael Huang & Chia-Chi Chang & Min-Hao Yuan & Ching-Yuan Chang & Chao-Hsiung Wu & Je-Lueng Shie & Yen-Hau Chen & Yi-Hung Chen & Chungfang Ho & Wei-Ren Chang & Tzu-Yi Yang & Far-Ching Lin, 2017. "Production of Torrefied Solid Bio-Fuel from Pulp Industry Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Ben-Iwo, Juliet & Manovic, Vasilije & Longhurst, Philip, 2016. "Biomass resources and biofuels potential for the production of transportation fuels in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 172-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Haylemar de Nazaret Cardenas-Rodriguez & Rosa Martins & Levy Ely Lacerda Oliveira & Erik Leandro Bonaldi & Frederico de Oliveira Assuncao & Germano Lambert-Torres & Helcio Francisco Villa-Nova & Wilso, 2021. "Analysis on the Use of Briquettes as an Alternative to Improve the Generation of Thermal Energy in the Locality of Aripuana-Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Anna Brunerová & Hynek Roubík & Milan Brožek, 2018. "Bamboo Fiber and Sugarcane Skin as a Bio-Briquette Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan, 2020. "A Review of Technical and Economic Aspects of Biomass Briquetting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Sławomir Francik & Adrian Knapczyk & Artur Knapczyk & Renata Francik, 2020. "Decision Support System for the Production of Miscanthus and Willow Briquettes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Nurul Ain Ab Jalil & Nur Asyikin Mokhtaruddin & Chin Hua Chia & Irfana Kabir Ahmad & Mohamad Jani Saad & Mahanim Sarif, 2022. "Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Agricultural-Plastic Wastes for Feasibility of Solid Fuel Briquette Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Okey Francis Obi & Ralf Pecenka & Michael J. Clifford, 2022. "A Review of Biomass Briquette Binders and Quality Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Setiawan, Andri D. & Cuppen, Eefje, 2013. "Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1188-1199.
    4. Zhang, Chen & Sun, Zongxuan, 2017. "Trajectory-based combustion control for renewable fuels in free piston engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 72-83.
    5. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Hötte, Kerstin & Pichler, Anton & Lafond, François, 2021. "The rise of science in low-carbon energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Renzi, Massimiliano & Bietresato, Marco & Mazzetto, Fabrizio, 2016. "An experimental evaluation of the performance of a SI internal combustion engine for agricultural purposes fuelled with different bioethanol blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1069-1080.
    8. Alves, Luís & Pereira, Vítor & Lagarteira, Tiago & Mendes, Adélio, 2021. "Catalytic methane decomposition to boost the energy transition: Scientific and technological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Ugwoke, B. & Gershon, O. & Becchio, C. & Corgnati, S.P. & Leone, P., 2020. "A review of Nigerian energy access studies: The story told so far," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. István Árpád & Judit T. Kiss & Gábor Bellér & Dénes Kocsis, 2021. "Sustainability Investigation of Vehicles’ CO 2 Emission in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Hívila M. P. Marreiro & Rogério S. Peruchi & Riuzuani M. B. P. Lopes & Silvia L. F. Andersen & Sayonara A. Eliziário & Paulo Rotella Junior, 2021. "Empirical Studies on Biomass Briquette Production: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-40, December.
    12. Wang, Jing & Liu, Sitong & Feng, Kun & Lou, Yu & Ma, Jun & Xing, Defeng, 2025. "Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Process intensification and artificial intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Cremonez, Paulo André & Feroldi, Michael & de Araújo, Amanda Viana & Negreiros Borges, Maykon & Weiser Meier, Thompson & Feiden, Armin & Gustavo Teleken, Joel, 2015. "Biofuels in Brazilian aviation: Current scenario and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1063-1072.
    14. Faubert, Patrick & Barnabé, Simon & Bouchard, Sylvie & Côté, Richard & Villeneuve, Claude, 2016. "Pulp and paper mill sludge management practices: What are the challenges to assess the impacts on greenhouse gas emissions?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-133.
    15. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    16. Chen, Gehao & Liu, Siwei & Wei, Xiangqian & Wei, Haoyang & Zhou, Xinyi & Chen, Xianhui & Zhang, Xinghua & Ma, Longlong, 2024. "An improved coking model for simulating reactive transport phenomena and coking behavior in sucrose hydrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    17. Luis Santos Pereira, 2017. "Water, Agriculture and Food: Challenges and Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2985-2999, August.
    18. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.
    19. Jozami, Emiliano & Mele, Fernando D & Piastrellini, Roxana & Civit, Bárbara M & Feldman, Susana R, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of bioenergy from lignocellulosic herbaceous biomass: The case study of Spartina argentinensis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    20. Peng, Valerie & Slocum, Alexander, 2020. "Endemic Water and Storm Trash to energy via in-situ processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:2119-:d:122746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.