IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i10p1504-d113445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Energy Biorefinery Model for Chestnut ( Castanea sativa Mill.) Shells

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Morana

    (Institute of Agro-Environmental and Forest Biology, National Research Council of Italy, Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Squillaci

    (Institute of Agro-Environmental and Forest Biology, National Research Council of Italy, Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Susana M. Paixão

    (LNEG, Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, Unidade de Bioenergia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Luís Alves

    (LNEG, Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, Unidade de Bioenergia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Francesco La Cara

    (Institute of Agro-Environmental and Forest Biology, National Research Council of Italy, Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Patrícia Moura

    (LNEG, Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, Unidade de Bioenergia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Chestnut shells (CS) are an agronomic waste generated from the peeling process of the chestnut fruit, which contain 2.7–5.2% ( w / w ) phenolic compounds and approximately 36% ( w / w ) polysaccharides. In contrast with current shell waste burning practices, this study proposes a CS biorefinery that integrates biomass pretreatment, recovery of bioactive molecules, and bioconversion of the lignocellulosic hydrolyzate, while optimizing materials reuse. The CS delignification and saccharification produced a crude hydrolyzate with 12.9 g/L of glucose and xylose, and 682 mg/L of gallic acid equivalents. The detoxification of the crude CS hydrolyzate with 5% ( w / v ) activated charcoal (AC) and repeated adsorption, desorption and AC reuse enabled 70.3% ( w / w ) of phenolic compounds recovery, whilst simultaneously retaining the soluble sugars in the detoxified hydrolyzate. The phenols radical scavenging activity (RSA) of the first AC eluate reached 51.8 ± 1.6%, which is significantly higher than that of the crude CS hydrolyzate (21.0 ± 1.1%). The fermentation of the detoxified hydrolyzate by C. butyricum produced 10.7 ± 0.2 mM butyrate and 63.9 mL H 2 /g of CS. Based on the obtained results, the CS biorefinery integrating two energy products (H 2 and calorific power from spent CS), two bioproducts (phenolic compounds and butyrate) and one material reuse (AC reuse) constitutes a valuable upgrading approach for this yet unexploited waste biomass.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Morana & Giuseppe Squillaci & Susana M. Paixão & Luís Alves & Francesco La Cara & Patrícia Moura, 2017. "Development of an Energy Biorefinery Model for Chestnut ( Castanea sativa Mill.) Shells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:10:p:1504-:d:113445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/10/1504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/10/1504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farshad Darvishi Harzevili & Serge Hiligsmann, 2017. "Microbial Fuels: Technologies and Applications," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/271293, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Kumar, G. & Bakonyi, P. & Periyasamy, S. & Kim, S.H. & Nemestóthy, N. & Bélafi-Bakó, K., 2015. "Lignocellulose biohydrogen: Practical challenges and recent progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 728-737.
    3. Sivagurunathan, Periyasamy & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Mudhoo, Ackmez & Rene, Eldon R. & Saratale, Ganesh Dattatraya & Kobayashi, Takuro & Xu, Kaiqin & Kim, Sang-Hyoun & Kim, Dong-Hoon, 2017. "Fermentative hydrogen production using lignocellulose biomass: An overview of pre-treatment methods, inhibitor effects and detoxification experiences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 28-42.
    4. Ortigueira, Joana & Pinto, Tiago & Gouveia, Luísa & Moura, Patrícia, 2015. "Production and storage of biohydrogen during sequential batch fermentation of Spirogyra hydrolyzate by Clostridium butyricum," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 528-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paula A. Pinto & Rui M. F. Bezerra & Irene Fraga & Carla Amaral & Ana Sampaio & Albino A. Dias, 2022. "Solid-State Fermentation of Chestnut Shells and Effect of Explanatory Variables in Predictive Saccharification Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    2. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    3. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Singh, Rajesh, 2022. "Co-factors applicability in hydrogen production from rice straw hydrolysate in a bioelectrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Shao, Weilan & Wang, Qiang & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Krishnan, Santhana & Ahmad, Fiaz & Rezania, Shahabaldin & Rashid, Muhammad Adnan & Sha, Chong & Md Din, Mohd Fadhil, 2020. "Biohydrogen production via thermophilic fermentation: A prospective application of Thermotoga species," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Basak, Bikram & Jeon, Byong-Hun & Kim, Tae Hyun & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Chatterjee, Pradip Kumar & Lim, Hankwon, 2020. "Dark fermentative hydrogen production from pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: Effects of inhibitory byproducts and recent trends in mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Rafał Łukajtis & Karolina Kucharska & Iwona Hołowacz & Piotr Rybarczyk & Katarzyna Wychodnik & Edyta Słupek & Paulina Nowak & Marian Kamiński, 2018. "Comparison and Optimization of Saccharification Conditions of Alkaline Pre-Treated Triticale Straw for Acid and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Followed by Ethanol Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Antony V. Samrot & Deenadhayalan Rajalakshmi & Mahendran Sathiyasree & Subramanian Saigeetha & Kasirajan Kasipandian & Nachiyar Valli & Nellore Jayshree & Pandurangan Prakash & Nagarajan Shobana, 2023. "A Review on Biohydrogen Sources, Production Routes, and Its Application as a Fuel Cell," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    9. Bakonyi, Péter & Buitrón, Germán & Valdez-Vazquez, Idania & Nemestóthy, Nándor & Bélafi-Bakó, Katalin, 2017. "A novel gas separation integrated membrane bioreactor to evaluate the impact of self-generated biogas recycling on continuous hydrogen fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 813-823.
    10. Liu, Zihe & Moradi, Hamideh & Shi, Shuobo & Darvishi, Farshad, 2021. "Yeasts as microbial cell factories for sustainable production of biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Kumar, Gopal Ramesh & Chowdhary, Nupoor, 2016. "Biotechnological and bioinformatics approaches for augmentation of biohydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1194-1206.
    12. Lucas van der Maas & Jasper L. S. P. Driessen & Solange I. Mussatto, 2021. "Effects of Inhibitory Compounds Present in Lignocellulosic Biomass Hydrolysates on the Growth of Bacillus subtilis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    14. Pattanamanee, Walailak & Chisti, Yusuf & Choorit, Wanna, 2015. "Photofermentive hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides S10 using mixed organic carbon: Effects of the mixture composition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 245-254.
    15. Haorui Zhang & Jiaolin Li & Quanguo Zhang & Shengnan Zhu & Shuai Yang & Zhiping Zhang, 2020. "Effect of Substrate Concentration on Photo-Fermentation Bio-Hydrogen Production Process from Starch-Rich Agricultural Leftovers under Oscillation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, March.
    16. Singh, Harshita & Varanasi, Jhansi L. & Banerjee, Srijoni & Das, Debabrata, 2019. "Production of carbohydrate enrich microalgal biomass as a bioenergy feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Lin, Chiu-Yue & Nguyen, Thi Mai-Linh & Chu, Chen-Yeon & Leu, Hoang-Jyh & Lay, Chyi-How, 2018. "Fermentative biohydrogen production and its byproducts: A mini review of current technology developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4215-4220.
    18. Shuang Liu & Wenzhe Li & Guoxiang Zheng & Haiyan Yang & Longhai Li, 2020. "Optimization of Cattle Manure and Food Waste Co-Digestion for Biohydrogen Production in a Mesophilic Semi-Continuous Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Soares, Juliana Ferreira & Confortin, Tássia Carla & Todero, Izelmar & Mayer, Flávio Dias & Mazutti, Marcio Antonio, 2020. "Dark fermentative biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass: Technological challenges and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Sołowski, Gaweł & Shalaby, Marwa.S. & Abdallah, Heba & Shaban, Ahmed.M. & Cenian, Adam, 2018. "Production of hydrogen from biomass and its separation using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3152-3167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:10:p:1504-:d:113445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.