IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v6y2018i3p46-d162878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consequences of Industry 4.0 in Business and Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Petra Maresova

    (Department of Economics, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)

  • Ivan Soukal

    (Department of Economics, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)

  • Libuse Svobodova

    (Department of Economics, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)

  • Martina Hedvicakova

    (Department of Economics, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)

  • Ehsan Javanmardi

    (School of Economics, Management and Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7194854358, Iran)

  • Ali Selamat

    (Malaysia Japan International Institute of Technology (MJIIT), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia)

  • Ondrej Krejcar

    (Center of Basic and Applied Research, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The introduction of information technology into all aspects of our lives has brought forth qualitative and quantitative changes on such a large scale that this process has come to be known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or Industry 4.0. The aim of this paper is to fill in the gaps and provide an overview of studies dealing with Industry 4.0 from the business and economic perspectives. A scoping review is performed regarding business, microeconomic and macroeconomic economic problems. Four investigators performed a literature search of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct. The selected period spanned from 2014 to 2018, and the following keywords were used for the search: Industry 4.0, economics, economic development, production economics, and financial sector. A total of 2275 results were returned. In all, 67 full papers were screened. Results obtained from the relevant studies were, furthermore, divided into the following categories: work and skills development; economy growth and macroeconomic aspect; sustainability; intelligent manufacturing; policy; and change in business processes. Findings show that the aspects of work and skills development, smart technology adoption, intelligent manufacturing, and digitalization are very well described. The government and its policies usually play the role of a needed supportive element. Usually studies lack a coherent view of the topic in question and solve partial questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra Maresova & Ivan Soukal & Libuse Svobodova & Martina Hedvicakova & Ehsan Javanmardi & Ali Selamat & Ondrej Krejcar, 2018. "Consequences of Industry 4.0 in Business and Economics," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:46-:d:162878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/6/3/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/6/3/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chovancova, Bozena & Dorocakova, Michaela & Malacka, Viera, 2018. "Changes in industrial structure of GDP and stock indices also with regard to the Industry 4.0," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 14(2), February.
    2. Viktoria Akberdina & Anatoliy Grebenkin & Olga Smirnova, 2017. "Comprehensive Assessment of Industries Economic Security: Regional Aspect," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 1264-1279.
    3. Bozena Chovancova & Michaela Dorocakova & Viera Malacka, 2018. "Changes in the industrial structure of GDP and stock indices also with regard to industry 4.0," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(2), pages 402-414, April.
    4. Antonella Petrillo & Fabio De Felice & Raffaele Cioffi & Federico Zomparelli, 2018. "Fourth Industrial Revolution: Current Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities," Chapters, in: Antonella Petrillo & Raffaele Cioffi & Fabio De Felice (ed.), Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, IntechOpen.
    5. Antony, Jürgen, 2009. "Capital/Labor substitution, capital deepening, and FDI," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 699-707, December.
    6. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    7. Joseph Evans Agolla, 2018. "Human Capital in the Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0 Revolution," Chapters, in: Antonella Petrillo & Raffaele Cioffi & Fabio De Felice (ed.), Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, IntechOpen.
    8. Hector Sala & Pedro Trivín, 2018. "The effects of globalization and technology on the elasticity of substitution," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(3), pages 617-647, August.
    9. Martina Hedvicakova, 2018. "Unemployment and effects of the first work experience of university graduates on their idea of a job," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(31), pages 3357-3363, July.
    10. Saam, Marianne, 2008. "Openness to trade as a determinant of the macroeconomic elasticity of substitution," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 691-702, June.
    11. Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen, 2016. "Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects [Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit: Entwicklungspfade und Perspektiven]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(1), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yüksel, Hilmi, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of industry 4.0 applications of companies in Turkey: The case of a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Grybauskas, Andrius & Stefanini, Alessandro & Ghobakhloo, Morteza, 2022. "Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature Review on the social implications of industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Afriyadi Cahyadi & Róbert Magda, 2021. "Digital Leadership in the Economies of the G20 Countries: A Secondary Research," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Andrey A. Zaytsev & Roman S. Blizkyi & Irina I. Rakhmeeva & Nikolay D. Dmitriev, 2021. "Building a Model for Financial Management of Digital Technologies in the Areas of Combinatorial Effects," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Violeta Sima & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe & Jonel Subić & Dumitru Nancu, 2020. "Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Lee, Jeongwon & Hwang, Junseok & Kim, Hana, 2022. "Different government support effects on emerging and mature ICT sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Marcin J. Piątkowski, 2020. "Expectations and Challenges in the Labour Market in the Context of Industrial Revolution 4.0. The Agglomeration Method-Based Analysis for Poland and Other EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Michael Knoblach & Fabian Stöckl, 2020. "What Determines The Elasticity Of Substitution Between Capital And Labor? A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 847-875, September.
    5. Hector Sala & Pedro Trivín, 2018. "The effects of globalization and technology on the elasticity of substitution," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(3), pages 617-647, August.
    6. Müller, Julian Marius & Buliga, Oana & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2018. "Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 2-17.
    7. Liudmila Samoilova & Dmitry Rodionov, 2022. "Production Function Based on Input–Output and Growth Rate Indicators as a Tool for Assessment of Innovation Climate in Russian Regions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Lung-Hsin Lin & Kung-Jeng Wang, 2022. "Talent Retention of New Generations for Sustainable Employment Relationships in Work 4.0 Era—Assessment by Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Srivastava, Deepak Kumar & Kumar, Vikas & Ekren, Banu Yetkin & Upadhyay, Arvind & Tyagi, Mrinal & Kumari, Archana, 2022. "Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Donnelly, Oisin & Sar, Kubra & Wang, Chao & Azadnia, Amir Hossein, 2022. "The successful implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing: An analysis and prioritization of risks in Irish industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Konuk, Hızır & Ataman, Göksel & Kambur, Emine, 2023. "The effect of digitalized workplace on employees' psychological well-being: Digital Taylorism approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Laeven, Luc & McAdam, Peter & Popov, Alexander, 2023. "Credit shocks, employment protection, and growth:firm-level evidence from spain," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Menti, Federica & Romero, David & Jacobsen, Peter, 2023. "A technology assessment and implementation model for evaluating socio-cultural and technical factors for the successful deployment of Logistics 4.0 technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Francis Aboagye‐Otchere & Cletus Agyenim‐Boateng & Abdulai Enusah & Theodora Ekua Aryee, 2021. "A Review of Big Data Research in Accounting," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 268-283, October.
    16. Anne Jurkat & Rainer Klump, 2009. "Endogenous Specialization and Factor Substitution in a Monetary Growth Model," DEGIT Conference Papers c014_036, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    17. Tomomi Hamada, 2019. "Determinants of Decision-Makers’ Attitudes toward Industry 4.0 Adaptation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Icks, Annette & Schröder, Christian & Brink, Sigrun & Dienes, Christian & Schneck, Stefan, 2017. "Digitalisierungsprozesse von KMU im Produzierenden Gewerbe," IfM-Materialien 255, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    19. Marco Antonio Paula Pinheiro & Daniel Jugend & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Hengky Latan, 2022. "Circular economy‐based new products and company performance: The role of stakeholders and Industry 4.0 technologies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 483-499, January.
    20. Ivan Kuyumdzhiev, 2022. "Digitization Levels - the Path of Digital Transformation of Administrative Services in Higher Education," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 11(2), pages 133-139, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:46-:d:162878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.