IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v10y2022i12p297-d984316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production Function Based on Input–Output and Growth Rate Indicators as a Tool for Assessment of Innovation Climate in Russian Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Liudmila Samoilova

    (Saint Petersburg Institute (Branch), All-Russian State University of Justice, 199178 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Dmitry Rodionov

    (Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Assessment of the innovation climate in Russian regions is a priority. Given the uneven socio-economic development of the federation subjects, it is essential to determine their readiness for the transition to an innovative course. However, due to the high degree of differentiation in the socio-economic development of Russian regions, when using methods based solely on tracking indicators, there is a decrease in the objectivity of the assessment. This is caused by a significant spread in the values of the indicators, which provokes the distortion of the final calculations. To avoid the subjectivization of calculations, it is appropriate to supplement them with the construction of functional dependencies. In this regard, the purpose of the study was to substantiate hypotheses about the possibility of using the production function to assess regions’ innovation climate. The process of evaluating the innovative climate of meso-territories is implemented using the methods of statistical analysis: absolute and relative statistical values, indices, interquartile range, time series, and regression analysis. As a result of building production function models in volumetric and temporal records, arguments are formulated regarding its use to characterize innovative conditions. In the study, an additional character of the production function was established; it is possible to use it, but with several assumptions. The obstacles to innovative transformations in the Russian regions are formulated based on the calculations. The scientific contribution of the authors comes down to substantiating the expediency of combining heterogeneous methods of analysis in identifying innovative conditions in Russian regions; it is proposed to combine both a generally recognized tool for these purposes—indicative analysis and a less common one—a production function.

Suggested Citation

  • Liudmila Samoilova & Dmitry Rodionov, 2022. "Production Function Based on Input–Output and Growth Rate Indicators as a Tool for Assessment of Innovation Climate in Russian Regions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:297-:d:984316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/12/297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/12/297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chovancova, Bozena & Dorocakova, Michaela & Malacka, Viera, 2018. "Changes in industrial structure of GDP and stock indices also with regard to the Industry 4.0," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 14(2), February.
    2. Ricardo Seidl da Fonseca, 2017. "The Future of Employment: Evaluating Impact of STI Foresight Exercises," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 9-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Jeongwon & Hwang, Junseok & Kim, Hana, 2022. "Different government support effects on emerging and mature ICT sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Marcin J. Piątkowski, 2020. "Expectations and Challenges in the Labour Market in the Context of Industrial Revolution 4.0. The Agglomeration Method-Based Analysis for Poland and Other EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Petra Maresova & Ivan Soukal & Libuse Svobodova & Martina Hedvicakova & Ehsan Javanmardi & Ali Selamat & Ondrej Krejcar, 2018. "Consequences of Industry 4.0 in Business and Economics," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Violeta Sima & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe & Jonel Subić & Dumitru Nancu, 2020. "Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    5. Artjom Rafaelevich Nagimov & Elvir Munirovich Akhmetshin & Valeriy Pavlovich Slanov & Raisa Nikolaevna Shpakova & Mikhail Prokopievich Solomonov & Dmitry Pavlovich Il'yaschenko, 2018. "Foresight Technologies in the Formation of a Sustainable Regional Development Strategy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 741-752.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:297-:d:984316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.