IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i2p53-d1591803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Big Is the Biomass-Based Bioeconomy in National Economies? Concept, Method, and Evidence from Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Antonio Montoya

    (Agribusiness Economics and Management Research Group, Faculty of Economics, Management, and Accounting—FEAC, University of Passo Fundo—UPF, Passo Fundo 99010-090, Brazil)

  • Gabriela Allegretti

    (Business Administration, Universidade de Rio Verde—UniRV, Rio Verde 75900-000, Brazil
    Brazilian Institute of Bioeconomy—INBBIO, Sapucaia do Sul 93214-360, Brazil
    Bioeconomics Research Group, Interdisciplinary Center for Research and Studies in Agribusiness—CEPAN, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul—UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil)

  • Elen Presotto

    (Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine—FAV, University of Brasília—UnB, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Edson Talamini

    (Brazilian Institute of Bioeconomy—INBBIO, Sapucaia do Sul 93214-360, Brazil
    Bioeconomics Research Group, Interdisciplinary Center for Research and Studies in Agribusiness—CEPAN, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul—UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil
    Department of Economics and International Relations—DERI, Faculty of Economics—FCE, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul—UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90040-000, Brazil)

Abstract

Measuring the contributions of the bioeconomy depends on the concept and method used. The concept of bioeconomy linked to biomass is widely used, and estimating the bio-based share in sectors, activities, or products is a limitation and a challenge. Therefore, the present study aims to propose a method for measuring the contributions of biomass-based bioeconomy (BmBB) by tracking the direct and indirect flows of biomass embodied in goods and services for intermediate and final demand. Our analysis focused on measuring the impact of BmBB on the gross value of production (GVP) and the value added to biomass through incremental improvements to the input–output models. The development and application of the method used data from Brazil’s input–output matrices from 2010 to 2018. The results suggest that the BmBB’s GVP shared 5.75% of the GDP, on average, between 2010 and 2018 and more than 6% in recent years. The BmBB accounted for 4.87% of the Brazilian economy’s added value. The ‘Biomass’ aggregate, comprising agriculture, livestock, and forestry, contributes 78.3% of GVP and 8.0% of BmBB’s added value. The opposite occurs with the ‘BioAgroindustry’ aggregate, whose GVP was only 12.3% but contributed 81.5% of the BmBB’s value added. The significant volume of direct sales of ‘’Biomass’ in the final demand of households and the foreign market may explain this situation. We concluded that the proposed method contributes to measuring the BmBB, capturing the biomass share involved in producing, manufacturing, and consuming goods and services.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Antonio Montoya & Gabriela Allegretti & Elen Presotto & Edson Talamini, 2025. "How Big Is the Biomass-Based Bioeconomy in National Economies? Concept, Method, and Evidence from Brazil," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:53-:d:1591803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/53/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/53/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guilhoto, J. J. M. & Sesso Filho, U. A., 2005. "Estimação da Matriz Insumo-Produto a Partir De Dados Preliminares das Contas Nacionais [Estimation of input-output matrix using preliminary data from national accounts]," MPRA Paper 38212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Montoya, Marco Antonio & Allegretti, Gabriela & Bertussi, Luís Antônio Sleimann & Talamini, Edson, 2023. "Domestic and foreign decoupling of economic growth and water consumption and its driving factors in the Brazilian economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Marco Capasso & Antje Klitkou, 2020. "Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor Norway’s Bioeconomy in Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Sesso Filho, Umberto Antonio, 2010. "Estimação da matriz insumo-produto utilizando dados preliminares das contas nacionais: aplicação e análise de indicadores econômicos para o Brasil em 2005 [Estimation of input-output matrix using p," MPRA Paper 37539, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Idiano D’Adamo & Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Enrica Imbert & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2022. "Exploring regional transitions to the bioeconomy using a socio-economic indicator: the case of Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(3), pages 989-1021, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florent Bédécarrats & Isabelle Guérin & François Roubaud, 2015. "The gold standard for randomized evaluations: from discussion of method to political economy," Working Papers DT/2015/01, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    2. Chagas, Lucas Squarize & Sant’Anna, Vinicios P., 2024. "International trade and wage inequality: Evidence from Brazil," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Joaquim Guilhoto & Cinthia Costa & Marcelo Cunha & Kathleen Araujo, 2011. "The Role of Ethanol in the Brazilian Economy: Three Decades of Progress," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1478, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Joachim Guilhoto & Jean-Marc Siroën & Ayçil Yücer, 2015. "The gravity model, global value chain and the brazilian states," Working Papers DT/2015/02, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    5. David, Leticia Scretas & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins, 2012. "O Potencial da Economia da Cultura no Brasil [The Potential of Cultural Economics in Brazil]," MPRA Paper 46958, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Santos, Diogo Oliveira & Britto, Gustavo & Ribeiro, Rafael S.M. & Cardoso, Debora Freire, 2023. "Do wages squeeze markups? Sectoral-level evidence for Brazil, 2000–2013," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 52-66.
    7. Edilberto Tiago de Almeida & Raul da Mota Silveira Neto & Roberta de Moraes Rocha, 2022. "Manufacturing location patterns in Brazil," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(4), pages 839-873, August.
    8. Gutierre, Leopoldo M. & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Nogueira, Tatiana A., 2012. "Estrutura produtiva, de consumo e de formação de renda brasileira: uma análise de insumo-produto para o ano de 2008 [Productive structure, consumption and Brazilian income formation: an analysis of," MPRA Paper 46956, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11720 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Elizondo, Alejandra & Boyd, Roy, 2017. "Economic impact of ethanol promotion in Mexico: A general equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 293-301.
    11. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Siroën, Jean-Marc & Yucer, Ayçil, 2013. "Internal and International Vertical Specialization– Estimations For Brazil and new Approach to Gravity Models," MPRA Paper 46897, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Malik, Arunima & Lenzen, Manfred & Ely, Rômulo Neves & Dietzenbacher, Erik, 2014. "Simulating the impact of new industries on the economy: The case of biorefining in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 84-93.
    13. Antonio Carlos Moretto & João Dias & João Carlos Lopes, & Rossana Lott Rodrigues, 2013. "Effects of demand shocks in the Brazilian economy: new production and value added multipliers," Working Papers Department of Economics 2013/22, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    14. Philippidis, George & M'Barek, Robert & Urban-Boysen, Kirsten & Van Zeist, Willem-Jan, 2023. "Exploring economy-wide sustainable conditions for EU bio-chemical activities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    15. Henrique Vinhais & Joaquim Guilhoto, 2012. "Economic Impact of the Expansion of Federal Universities in Brazil," TD NEREUS 16-2012, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    16. Guilhoto, J. J. M. & Ichihara, S. M. & Silveira, F. G. & Azzoni, Carlos Roberto, 2006. "Comparação Entre O Agronegócio Familiar Do Rio Grande Do Sul E Do Brasil [Comparing The Agribusiness For The State Of Rio Grande Do Sul And For Brazil As A Whole]," MPRA Paper 38040, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Yang Guo & Liqun Peng & Jinping Tian & Denise L. Mauzerall, 2023. "Deploying green hydrogen to decarbonize China’s coal chemical sector," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Alexandre Messa, 2012. "Structural Change in The Brazilian Economy in The 2000s," Discussion Papers 1770, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    19. Gustavo de Souza & Haishi Li, 2025. "The Employment Consequences of Anti-Dumping Tariffs: Lessons from Brazil," CESifo Working Paper Series 11654, CESifo.
    20. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Camargo, Fernanda Sartori de, 2008. "Employment and familiar agriculture agribusiness in the Brazilian economy: an interregional Leontief-Miyazawa model approach," MPRA Paper 29781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Eduardo A. Haddad & Juan M. G. Samaniego, Alexandre A. Porsse, Diego Ochoa, Santiago Ochoa, Luiz G. A. de Souza, 2011. "Interregional Input-Ouptut System for Ecuador, 2007: Methodology and Results," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2011_08, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:53-:d:1591803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.