IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i12p341-d1542583.html

Falling Short on Long-Term Care Efficiency Change? A Non-Parametric Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Augusto Carlos Mercadier

    (Doctoral School of the Miguel Hernández University of Elche (EDUMH), PhD Program in Economics (DEcIDE), Center of Operations Research (CIO), Miguel Hernandez University of Elche (UMH), 03202 Elche, Spain)

  • Irene Belmonte-Martín

    (Social Sciences and Humanities Department, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche (UMH), 03202 Elche, Spain)

  • Lidia Ortiz

    (Center of Operations Research (CIO), Miguel Hernandez University of Elche (UMH), 03202 Elche, Spain)

Abstract

The European Commission’s 2015 aging report forecasts a substantial increase in public spending on Long-Term Care (LTC) for OECD countries by 2060, posing significant fiscal challenges. This study aims to assess the efficiency and productivity of the LTC sector from 2010 to 2019 and explore whether efficiency gains can alleviate these fiscal pressures. Using a non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, combined with Tobit regression, we estimate the efficiency of OECD countries and examine the role of decentralization in shaping performance outcomes. The findings reveal that, on average, countries operate at 94% efficiency, with modest productivity growth. However, technical inefficiencies persist, especially in unitary countries, while federal countries, though initially less efficient, show greater improvements over time. Despite these gains, the current efficiency levels are insufficient to counterbalance the projected increase in LTC demand. Policymakers should prioritize reforms that enhance efficiency through decentralization, promoting accountability and competition as mechanisms to sustain the LTC system in the face of demographic shifts.

Suggested Citation

  • Augusto Carlos Mercadier & Irene Belmonte-Martín & Lidia Ortiz, 2024. "Falling Short on Long-Term Care Efficiency Change? A Non-Parametric Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:341-:d:1542583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/12/341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/12/341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 1998. "Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 49-61, January.
    2. Pablo Cos & Enrique Moral-Benito, 2014. "Determinants of health-system efficiency: evidence from OECD countries," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 69-93, March.
    3. Andrei Shleifer, 1985. "A Theory of Yardstick Competition," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(3), pages 319-327, Autumn.
    4. Ray, Subhash C & Desli, Evangelia, 1997. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1033-1039, December.
    5. Raymond L. Raab & Richard W. Lichty, 2002. "Identifying Subareas That Comprise A Greater Metropolitan Area: The Criterion of County Relative Efficiency," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 579-594, August.
    6. Besley, Timothy, 2007. "Principled Agents?: The Political Economy of Good Government," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199283910.
    7. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, January.
    8. Fare, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna, 1992. "Malmquist Productivity Indexes and Fisher Ideal Indexes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 102(410), pages 158-160, January.
    9. Vasanthakumar Bhat, 2005. "Institutional arrangements and efficiency of health care delivery systems," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(3), pages 215-222, September.
    10. Lydia L. Ogden & Kathleen Adams, 2009. "Poorhouse to Warehouse: Institutional Long-Term Care in the United States," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 138-163, Winter.
    11. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    12. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
    13. Sorin Dan & Christopher Pollitt, 2015. "NPM Can Work: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern Europe," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1305-1332, October.
    14. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, January.
    15. Tine Rostgaard & Frode Jacobsen & Teppo Kröger & Elin Peterson, 2022. "Revisiting the Nordic long-term care model for older people—still equal?," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 201-210, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iparraguirre, José Luis & Ma, Ruosi, 2015. "Efficiency in the provision of social care for older people. A three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis using self-reported quality of life," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 33-46.
    2. Vicente J. Bolos & Rafael Benitez & Vicente Coll-Serrano, 2025. "Conventional and Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis with deaR," Papers 2506.03766, arXiv.org.
    3. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2023. "Productivity analysis: roots, foundations, trends and perspectives," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 229-247, December.
    4. Thanh Ngo & Kan Wai Hong Tsui, 2022. "Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3411-3434, September.
    5. Santos, Micael & Rodríguez, Xosé A. & Marta-Costa, Ana, 2020. "Efficiency analysis of viticulture systems in the Portuguese Douro region," MPRA Paper 128918, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Aliasghar Arabmaldar & John Otu Asu, 2022. "Robust productivity growth and efficiency measurement with undesirable outputs: evidence from the oil industry," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1213-1254, December.
    7. Calogero Guccio & Marco Ferdinando Martorana & Luisa Monaco, 2016. "Evaluating the impact of the Bologna Process on the efficiency convergence of Italian universities: a non-parametric frontier approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 275-298, June.
    8. Ajayi, Victor & Anaya, Karim & Pollitt, Michael, 2022. "Incentive regulation, productivity growth and environmental effects: the case of electricity networks in Great Britain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Zhang, Ting & Liu, Fangtong & Wang, Jing, 2018. "Performance efficiency assessment of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: A three-phase data envelopment analysis model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 599-610.
    10. Efecan, Ezgi Önen & Efecan, Volkan, 2025. "Impacts of social determinants on the transient and persistent inefficiency of health systems in OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Guillen, Maria D. & Aparicio, Juan & Kapelko, Magdalena & Esteve, Miriam, 2025. "Measuring environmental inefficiency through machine learning: An approach based on efficiency analysis trees and by-production technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(2), pages 529-542.
    12. Adriana Cobas & Alexandros Maziotis & Andrés Villegas, 2023. "Measurement of Efficiency and its Drivers in the Chilean Banking Industry," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 987, Central Bank of Chile.
    13. Lin Liu & Honggang Sun, 2019. "The Impact of Collective Forestland Tenure Reform on the Forest Economic Efficiency of Farmers in Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Nan Jiang & Antony Andrews, 2020. "Efficiency of New Zealand’s District Health Boards at Providing Hospital Services: A stochastic frontier analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 53-68, February.
    15. Thiago Victorino & Carlos Rosano Peña, 2023. "The Development of Efficiency Analysis in Transportation Systems: A Bibliometric and Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Varabyova, Yauheniya & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2013. "International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: Panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 70-79.
    17. Marthinus C. Breitenbach & Victor Ngobeni & Goodness C. Aye, 2021. "Efficiency of Healthcare Systems in the First Wave of COVID-19 – A Technical Efficiency Analysis," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 3-21.
    18. Kim, Man-Keun & Harris, Thomas R., 2008. "An Efficiency Analysis of Nevada and Utah Counties: Region Size Leads Regional Efficiency," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6338, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Maria Nieswand & Stefan Seifert, 2016. "Operational Conditions in Regulatory Benchmarking Models: A Monte Carlo Analysis," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1585, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Brzezicki Łukasz, 2025. "Origin and Evolution of Malmquist Productivity Index: Review of the Literature," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 12(59), pages 102-119.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:341-:d:1542583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.