IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v11y2023i1p6-d1068330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Industry-Distress Effects on Loan Recovery: A Double Machine Learning Approach for Quantiles

Author

Listed:
  • Hui-Ching Chuang

    (College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan)

  • Jau-er Chen

    (Department of Economics, Senshu University, Kawasaki 214-8580, Kanagawa, Japan
    Center for Research in Econometric Theory and Applications, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

In this study, we explore the effect of industry distress on recovery rates by using the unconditional quantile regression (UQR). The UQR provides better interpretative and thus policy-relevant information on the predictive effect of the target variable than the conditional quantile regression. To deal with a broad set of macroeconomic and industry variables, we use the lasso-based double selection to estimate the predictive effects of industry distress and select relevant variables. Our sample consists of 5334 debt and loan instruments in Moody’s Default and Recovery Database from 1990 to 2017. The results show that industry distress decreases recovery rates from 15.80% to 2.94% for the 15th to 55th percentile range and slightly increases the recovery rates in the lower and the upper tails. The UQR provide quantitative measurements to the loss given default during a downturn that the Basel Capital Accord requires.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui-Ching Chuang & Jau-er Chen, 2023. "Exploring Industry-Distress Effects on Loan Recovery: A Double Machine Learning Approach for Quantiles," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:6-:d:1068330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/11/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/11/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gambetti, Paolo & Gauthier, Geneviève & Vrins, Frédéric, 2019. "Recovery rates: Uncertainty certainly matters," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 371-383.
    2. Guanhao Feng & Stefano Giglio & Dacheng Xiu, 2020. "Taming the Factor Zoo: A Test of New Factors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(3), pages 1327-1370, June.
    3. Jau-er Chen & Chen-Wei Hsiang, 2019. "Causal Random Forests Model Using Instrumental Variable Quantile Regression," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Gürtler, Marc & Hibbeln, Martin, 2013. "Improvements in loss given default forecasts for bank loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2354-2366.
    5. Nazemi, Abdolreza & Heidenreich, Konstantin & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2018. "Improving corporate bond recovery rate prediction using multi-factor support vector regressions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 664-675.
    6. Qi, Min & Zhao, Xinlei, 2011. "Comparison of modeling methods for Loss Given Default," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2842-2855, November.
    7. Acharya, Viral V. & Bharath, Sreedhar T. & Srinivasan, Anand, 2007. "Does industry-wide distress affect defaulted firms? Evidence from creditor recoveries," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 787-821, September.
    8. Jankowitsch, Rainer & Nagler, Florian & Subrahmanyam, Marti G., 2014. "The determinants of recovery rates in the US corporate bond market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 155-177.
    9. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2014. "High-Dimensional Methods and Inference on Structural and Treatment Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(2), pages 29-50, Spring.
    10. Yuanchen Chang & Yi‐Ting Hsieh & Wenchien Liu & Peter Miu, 2020. "Intra‐industry bankruptcy contagion: Evidence from the pricing of industry recovery rates," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(2), pages 503-534, March.
    11. Nazemi, Abdolreza & Baumann, Friedrich & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2022. "Intertemporal defaulted bond recoveries prediction via machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1162-1177.
    12. Sergio Firpo & Nicole M. Fortin & Thomas Lemieux, 2009. "Unconditional Quantile Regressions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 953-973, May.
    13. Nazemi, Abdolreza & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2018. "Macroeconomic variable selection for creditor recovery rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 14-25.
    14. Yuya Sasaki & Takuya Ura & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "Unconditional quantile regression with high‐dimensional data," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), pages 955-978, July.
    15. Hartmann-Wendels, Thomas & Miller, Patrick & Töws, Eugen, 2014. "Loss given default for leasing: Parametric and nonparametric estimations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 364-375.
    16. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    17. Somers, Mark & Whittaker, Joe, 2007. "Quantile regression for modelling distributions of profit and loss," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(3), pages 1477-1487, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Gambetti & Francesco Roccazzella & Frédéric Vrins, 2022. "Meta-Learning Approaches for Recovery Rate Prediction," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Nazemi, Abdolreza & Baumann, Friedrich & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2022. "Intertemporal defaulted bond recoveries prediction via machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1162-1177.
    3. Kellner, Ralf & Nagl, Maximilian & Rösch, Daniel, 2022. "Opening the black box – Quantile neural networks for loss given default prediction," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Pascal François, 2019. "The Determinants of Market-Implied Recovery Rates," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Konstantin Gorgen & Abdolreza Nazemi & Melanie Schienle, 2022. "Robust Knockoffs for Controlling False Discoveries With an Application to Bond Recovery Rates," Papers 2206.06026, arXiv.org.
    6. Nazemi, Abdolreza & Fatemi Pour, Farnoosh & Heidenreich, Konstantin & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2017. "Fuzzy decision fusion approach for loss-given-default modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 780-791.
    7. Betz, Jennifer & Kellner, Ralf & Rösch, Daniel, 2018. "Systematic Effects among Loss Given Defaults and their Implications on Downturn Estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1113-1144.
    8. Wang, Hong & Forbes, Catherine S. & Fenech, Jean-Pierre & Vaz, John, 2020. "The determinants of bank loan recovery rates in good times and bad – New evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 875-897.
    9. Jochen Güntner & Benjamin Karner, 2023. "The bond agio premium," Economics working papers 2023-13, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    10. Sopitpongstorn, Nithi & Silvapulle, Param & Gao, Jiti & Fenech, Jean-Pierre, 2021. "Local logit regression for loan recovery rate," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Krüger, Steffen & Rösch, Daniel, 2017. "Downturn LGD modeling using quantile regression," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 42-56.
    12. Nazemi, Abdolreza & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2018. "Macroeconomic variable selection for creditor recovery rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 14-25.
    13. Jennifer Betz & Ralf Kellner & Daniel Rösch, 2021. "Time matters: How default resolution times impact final loss rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 619-644, June.
    14. Kaposty, Florian & Kriebel, Johannes & Löderbusch, Matthias, 2020. "Predicting loss given default in leasing: A closer look at models and variable selection," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 248-266.
    15. Gambetti, Paolo & Gauthier, Geneviève & Vrins, Frédéric, 2019. "Recovery rates: Uncertainty certainly matters," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 371-383.
    16. Jean‐François Bégin & Mathieu Boudreault & Mathieu Thériault, 2024. "Leveraging prices from credit and equity option markets for portfolio risk management," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 122-147, January.
    17. Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Antoine Patin, 2018. "Loss functions for LGD model comparison," Working Papers halshs-01516147, HAL.
    18. Bellotti, Anthony & Brigo, Damiano & Gambetti, Paolo & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Forecasting recovery rates on non-performing loans with machine learning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 428-444.
    19. Hwang, Ruey-Ching & Chu, Chih-Kang & Yu, Kaizhi, 2020. "Predicting LGD distributions with mixed continuous and discrete ordinal outcomes," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1003-1022.
    20. Jobst, Rainer & Kellner, Ralf & Rösch, Daniel, 2020. "Bayesian loss given default estimation for European sovereign bonds," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1073-1091.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:6-:d:1068330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.