IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i6p664-d1616738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergy, Environmental and Economic (3E) Assessment of Biomass Pellets from Agricultural Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Deng

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Clean Production and Utilization of Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
    National Center for International Research of BioEnergy Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xueling Ran

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Clean Production and Utilization of Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
    National Center for International Research of BioEnergy Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hussien Elshareef

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Clean Production and Utilization of Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
    National Center for International Research of BioEnergy Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Renjie Dong

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Clean Production and Utilization of Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
    National Center for International Research of BioEnergy Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuguang Zhou

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Clean Production and Utilization of Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
    National Center for International Research of BioEnergy Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Biomass pellets are increasingly recognized as a cost-effective and sustainable renewable energy source worldwide. However, comprehensive sustainability assessments of their production processes are scarce. To address this gap, three distinct scenarios in Northeast China were evaluated using emergy, economic, and environmental analysis methods: corn single production, corn–pellet co-production, and pellet production. A modified method for calculating the environmental loading rate ( ELR ) was proposed, which accounts for the environmental benefits associated with replacing coal with biomass pellets for heating. The results showed that corn–pellet co-production demonstrates superior energy efficiency compared to corn-only production, but presents a contrasting economic profile. The ELR for corn single production and corn–pellet co-production are 1.57 and 1.63, respectively, with corresponding emergy sustainability indices ( ESI ) of 0.89 and 0.84. After applying the modified method, the ELR and ESI for corn–pellet co-production were adjusted to 0.84 and 1.63, respectively, and the ESI of pellet production increased from 8.24 to 21.15. Furthermore, processing corn straw into biomass pellets for heating can reduce heating costs by approximately USD 254.26/hm 2 and reduce emissions of SO 2 , NO x , CO, PM 2.5 , and CO 2 by 9.12, 19.82, 580.31, 65.86, and 13,060.66 kg/hm 2 , respectively. Sensitivity analysis revealed that transportation distance and renewable electricity have a greater impact on pellet production than corn–pellet co-production. The ESI for pellet production decreases from 21.15 to 14.02 as transport distance increases from 20 km to 100 km, while it rises to 57.81 as the proportion of renewable energy in the power supply increases from 0% to 100%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Deng & Xueling Ran & Hussien Elshareef & Renjie Dong & Yuguang Zhou, 2025. "Emergy, Environmental and Economic (3E) Assessment of Biomass Pellets from Agricultural Waste," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:664-:d:1616738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/664/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/664/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Shizhong & Liu, Pei & Xu, Jing & Chong, Chinhao & Huang, Xianzheng & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2017. "Life cycle assessment and economic evaluation of pellet fuel from corn straw in China: A case study in Jilin Province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-381.
    2. Olabi, A.G. & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Renewable energy and climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Brown, Mark T. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Assessing the global environmental sources driving the geobiosphere: A revised emergy baseline," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 126-132.
    4. Clausen, Laura Tolnov & Rudolph, David, 2020. "Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Rudolfsson, Magnus & Borén, Eleonora & Pommer, Linda & Nordin, Anders & Lestander, Torbjörn A., 2017. "Combined effects of torrefaction and pelletization parameters on the quality of pellets produced from torrefied biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 414-424.
    6. Brown, Mark T. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2010. "Updated evaluation of exergy and emergy driving the geobiosphere: A review and refinement of the emergy baseline," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(20), pages 2501-2508.
    7. Sun, Yufeng & Yang, Bin & Wang, Yapeng & Zheng, Zipeng & Wang, Jinwei & Yue, Yaping & Mu, Wenlong & Xu, Guangyin & Jilai Ying,, 2023. "Emergy evaluation of biogas production system in China from perspective of collection radius," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Dong, Jun & Zhang, Xu & Xu, Xiaolin, 2012. "Techno-economic assessment and policy of gas power generation considering the role of multiple stakeholders in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 209-221.
    9. Zhang, Meimei & Wang, Zhifeng & Xu, Chao & Jiang, Hui, 2012. "Embodied energy and emergy analyses of a concentrating solar power (CSP) system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 232-238.
    10. Luigi F. Polonini & Domenico Petrocelli & Simone P. Parmigiani & Adriano M. Lezzi, 2019. "Influence on CO and PM Emissions of an Innovative Burner Pot for Pellet Stoves: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Dorokhov, V.V. & Nyashina, G.S. & Romanov, D.S. & Strizhak, P.A., 2024. "Combustion and mechanical properties of pellets from biomass and industrial waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Wöhler, Marius & Jaeger, Dirk & Reichert, Gabriel & Schmidl, Christoph & Pelz, Stefan K., 2017. "Influence of pellet length on performance of pellet room heaters under real life operation conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 66-75.
    13. Sungur, Bilal & Basar, Cem & Kaleli, Alirıza, 2023. "Multi-objective optimisation of the emission parameters and efficiency of pellet stove at different supply airflow positions based on machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Vicente, E.D. & Vicente, A.M. & Evtyugina, M. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Almeida, S.M. & Alves, C., 2020. "Emissions from residential combustion of certified and uncertified pellets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1059-1071.
    3. Junxue Zhang & Lin Ma, 2021. "Urban ecological security dynamic analysis based on an innovative emergy ecological footprint method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16163-16191, November.
    4. Campbell, Daniel E., 2016. "Emergy baseline for the Earth: A historical review of the science and a new calculation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 96-125.
    5. Zhicheng Gao & Rongjin Wan & Qian Ye & Weiguo Fan & Shihui Guo & Sergio Ulgiati & Xiaobin Dong, 2020. "Typhoon Disaster Risk Assessment Based on Emergy Theory: A Case Study of Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Duian Lu & Jie Cheng & Zhenzhou Feng & Li Sun & Wei Mo & Degang Wang, 2022. "Emergy Synthesis of Two Oyster Aquaculture Systems in Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Junxue Zhang & He Zhang & Ashish T. Asutosh & Nameng Sun & Xindi Li, 2025. "The environmental sustainability assessment of building ceramic manufacturing based on the LCA-emergy approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5999-6024, March.
    8. Siegel, Eric & Brown, Mark T. & De Vilbiss, Chris & Arden, Sam, 2016. "Calculating solar equivalence ratios of the four major heat-producing radiogenic isotopes in the Earth's crust and mantle," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 140-147.
    9. Brown, Mark T. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Emergy assessment of global renewable sources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 148-156.
    10. Zhang, XiaoHong & Hu, He & Zhang, Rong & Deng, ShiHuai, 2014. "Interactions between China׳s economy, energy and the air emissions and their policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 624-638.
    11. Liu, Gengyuan & Hao, Yan & Dong, Liang & Yang, Zhifeng & Zhang, Yan & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2017. "An emergy-LCA analysis of municipal solid waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 131-143.
    12. Brown, Mark T. & Campbell, Daniel E. & De Vilbiss, Christopher & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "The geobiosphere emergy baseline: A synthesis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 92-95.
    13. Xiaoyu Xu, 2021. "Multi-System Urban Waste-Energy Self-Circulation: Design of Urban Self-Circulation System Based on Emergy Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Xiang, Qing & Pan, Hengyu & Ma, Xiaohan & Yang, Mingdong & Lyu, Yanfeng & Zhang, Xiaohong & Shui, Wei & Liao, Wenjie & Xiao, Yinlong & Wu, Jun & Zhang, Yanzong & Xu, Min, 2024. "Impacts of energy-saving and emission-reduction on sustainability of cement production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Pan, Hengyu & Geng, Yong & Jiang, Ping & Dong, Huijuan & Sun, Lu & Wu, Rui, 2018. "An emergy based sustainability evaluation on a combined landfill and LFG power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 310-322.
    16. Lee, Dong Joo & Brown, Mark T., 2021. "Estimating the Value of Global Ecosystem Structure and Productivity: A Geographic Information System and Emergy Based Approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 439(C).
    17. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of ladder hydropower generation systems in the middle and lower reaches of the Lancang River," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1038-1050.
    18. Chen, Yangfan & Zhang, Xiaohong, 2021. "Investigating the interactions between Chinese economic growth, energy consumption and its air environmental cost during 1989–2016 and forecasting their future trends," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 461(C).
    19. Zhang, Xugang & Xu, Lu & Zhang, Hua & Jiang, Zhigang & Wang, Yan, 2021. "Emergy based sustainability evaluation model for retired machineries integrating energy, environmental and social factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Huang, Shupei & An, Haizhong & Viglia, Silvio & Fiorentino, Gabriella & Corcelli, Fabiana & Fang, Wei & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2018. "Terrestrial transport modalities in China concerning monetary, energy and environmental costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 129-141.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:664-:d:1616738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.