IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i3p259-d1576642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Performance of a Continuous Durum Wheat Cropping System in a Mediterranean Environment: Carbon and Water Footprint at Different Sowing Dates, Under Rainfed and Irrigated Water Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Pasquale Garofalo

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics—Agricultural and Environment, Via Celso Ulpiani, 5, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Anna Rita Bernadette Cammerino

    (Department of Science of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering, University of Foggia, Via Napoli, 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy)

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental impacts and productivity of a continuous durum wheat cropping system under three sowing dates and two water regimes, i.e., rainfed and irrigation at flowering in the Mediterranean context, specifically in the Capitanata plain of Apulia, Italy. AquaCrop-GIS was employed to model the yield response of durum wheat on the different sowing dates (15 October, 1 November, and 15 November) and with different water management practices. In addition, the Carbon and Water Footprint (CWFP) tool was used to quantify the environmental impacts in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and water use, including green, blue, and total water components. Results indicated that the total greenhouse gas emissions (CO 2 _eq) from wheat production averaged 1201.3 kg CO 2 _eq ha −1 , with fertilization, in particular the application of ammonium nitrate and urea, being the main contributor. Soil management practices contributed 362.9 kg CO 2 _eq ha −1 . Early-November sowing achieved the highest productivity, 5573 kg ha −1 under the rainfed option and 5722 kg ha −1 under irrigated management, while mid-November sowing resulted in lower yields and 21% higher CO 2 _eq emissions per kilogram of grain compared to early November. Water Footprint analysis revealed that early-November sowing had the highest green water demand, with negligible differences in blue water use between sowing dates. Overall, the integration of these data showed that optimizing sowing dates and irrigation practices can significantly improve yields and reduce environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Pasquale Garofalo & Anna Rita Bernadette Cammerino, 2025. "Modeling the Performance of a Continuous Durum Wheat Cropping System in a Mediterranean Environment: Carbon and Water Footprint at Different Sowing Dates, Under Rainfed and Irrigated Water Regimes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:259-:d:1576642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pereira, Luis S. & Cordery, Ian & Iacovides, Iacovos, 2012. "Improved indicators of water use performance and productivity for sustainable water conservation and saving," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 39-51.
    2. Rezzouk, Fatima Zahra & Gracia-Romero, Adrian & Kefauver, Shawn C. & Nieto-Taladriz, Maria Teresa & Serret, Maria Dolores & Araus, José Luis, 2022. "Durum wheat ideotypes in Mediterranean environments differing in water and temperature conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Trombetta, Andrea & Iacobellis, Vito & Tarantino, Eufemia & Gentile, Francesco, 2016. "Calibration of the AquaCrop model for winter wheat using MODIS LAI images," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 164(P2), pages 304-316.
    4. Zeleke, K.T. & Nendel, C., 2016. "Analysis of options for increasing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in south-eastern Australia: The role of irrigation, cultivar choice and time of sowing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 139-148.
    5. Perry, Chris, 2014. "Water footprints: Path to enlightenment, or false trail?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 119-125.
    6. Li, Jiamin & Inanaga, Shinobu & Li, Zhaohu & Eneji, A. Egrinya, 2005. "Optimizing irrigation scheduling for winter wheat in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 8-23, July.
    7. Khan, Shahbaz & Hanjra, Munir A., 2009. "Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production - Global perspectives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 130-140, April.
    8. Karam, Fadi & Kabalan, Rabih & Breidi, Jolle & Rouphael, Youssef & Oweis, Theib, 2009. "Yield and water-production functions of two durum wheat cultivars grown under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 603-615, April.
    9. Wellens, Joost & Raes, Dirk & Fereres, Elias & Diels, Jan & Coppye, Cecilia & Adiele, Joy Geraldine & Ezui, Kodjovi Senam Guillaume & Becerra, Luis-Augusto & Selvaraj, Michael Gomez & Dercon, Gerd & H, 2022. "Calibration and validation of the FAO AquaCrop water productivity model for cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    10. Levidow, Les & Zaccaria, Daniele & Maia, Rodrigo & Vivas, Eduardo & Todorovic, Mladen & Scardigno, Alessandra, 2014. "Improving water-efficient irrigation: Prospects and difficulties of innovative practices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 84-94.
    11. Zwart, Sander J. & Bastiaanssen, Wim G.M. & de Fraiture, Charlotte & Molden, David J., 2010. "A global benchmark map of water productivity for rainfed and irrigated wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1617-1627, October.
    12. Khan, S. & Khan, M.A. & Hanjra, M.A. & Mu, J., 2009. "Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy inputs in food production," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 141-149, April.
    13. Maraseni, T.N. & Cockfield, G., 2011. "Does the adoption of zero tillage reduce greenhouse gas emissions? An assessment for the grains industry in Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(6), pages 451-458, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomaz, Alexandra & Palma, José Ferro & Ramos, Tiago & Costa, Maria Natividade & Rosa, Elizabete & Santos, Marta & Boteta, Luís & Dôres, José & Patanita, Manuel, 2021. "Yield, technological quality and water footprints of wheat under Mediterranean climate conditions: A field experiment to evaluate the effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Fernández, J.E. & Alcon, F. & Diaz-Espejo, A. & Hernandez-Santana, V. & Cuevas, M.V., 2020. "Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high density olive tree orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Zhou, Qing & Zhang, Yali & Wu, Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of the most proper management scale on water use efficiency and water productivity: A case study of the Heihe River Basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Jackson, T.M. & Hanjra, Munir A. & Khan, S. & Hafeez, M.M., 2011. "Building a climate resilient farm: A risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 729-745.
    5. Kaur, Navneet & Vashist, Krishan Kumar & Brar, A.S., 2021. "Energy and productivity analysis of maize based crop sequences compared to rice-wheat system under different moisture regimes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Ji-ping Gao & Cheng Su & Hai-yan Wang & Li-hua Zhai & Yun-tao Pan, 2019. "Research fund evaluation based on academic publication output analysis: the case of Chinese research fund evaluation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 959-972, May.
    7. Vibhas Sukhwani & Arie Nurzaman & Nadia Paramitha Kusumawardhani & Anwaar Mohammed AlHinai & Liu Hanyu & Rajib Shaw, 2019. "Enhancing Food Security by Institutionalizing Collaborative Food Alliances in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Liang, Long & Lal, Rattan & Ridoutt, Bradley G. & Zhao, Guishen & Du, Zhangliu & Li, Li & Feng, Dangyang & Wang, Liyuan & Peng, Peng & Hang, Sheng & Wu, Wenliang, 2018. "Multi-indicator assessment of a water-saving agricultural engineering project in North Beijing, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 34-46.
    9. World Bank [WB], 2016. "High and Dry : Climate Change, Water, and the Economy," Working Papers id:10736, eSocialSciences.
    10. Azzurra ANNUNZIATA & Debora SCARPATO, 2014. "Factors affecting consumer attitudes towards food products with sustainable attributes," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(8), pages 353-363.
    11. Feng, Suwei & Ding, Weihua & Shi, Chenchen & Zhu, Xiaoling & Hu, Tiezhu & Ru, Zhengang, 2023. "Optimizing the spatial distribution of roots by supplemental irrigation to improve grain yield and water use efficiency of wheat in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Beibei Guo & Xian Zou & Tingting Cheng & Yan Li & Jie Huang & Tingting Sun & Yi Tong, 2025. "Assessment of the Food–Energy–Water Nexus Considering the Carbon Footprint and Trade-Offs in Crop Production Systems in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Ziyi Wang & Zengqiao Chen & Cuiping Ma & Ronald Wennersten & Qie Sun, 2022. "Nationwide Evaluation of Urban Energy System Resilience in China Using a Comprehensive Index Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-36, February.
    14. Bartłomiej Bajan & Aldona Mrówczyńska-Kamińska & Walenty Poczta, 2020. "Economic Energy Efficiency of Food Production Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Michał Napierała & Mariusz Sojka & Joanna Jaskuła, 2023. "Impact of Water Meadow Restoration on Forage Hay Production in Different Hydro-Meteorological Conditions: A Case Study of Racot, Central Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Moon, Wanki, 2011. "Is agriculture compatible with free trade?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 13-24.
    17. Valeria De Laurentiis & Dexter V.L. Hunt & Christopher D.F. Rogers, 2016. "Overcoming Food Security Challenges within an Energy/Water/Food Nexus (EWFN) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Schwerhoff, Gregor & Sy, Mouhamadou, 2017. "Financing renewable energy in Africa – Key challenge of the sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 393-401.
    19. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2018. "Determining water use efficiency of wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 48-60.
    20. Vallury, Sechindra & Abbott, Joshua K. & Shin, Hoon C. & Anderies, John M., 2020. "Sustaining Coupled Irrigation Infrastructures: Multiple Instruments for Multiple Dilemmas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:259-:d:1576642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.