IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i17p1817-d1732962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multivariate Probit Model Analysis of the Factors Influencing Smallholder Farmers’ Choice of ICT Tools: A Case Study of Mpumalanga, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Melga Meta Ntsoane

    (School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa)

  • Jorine Tafadzwa Ndoro

    (School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa)

  • Ntombovuyo Wayi-Mgwebi

    (School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa)

Abstract

This study examined factors influencing smallholder farmers’ decisions to use Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for agricultural information in Mbombela Local Municipality, Mpumalanga, South Africa. Data were collected from 308 respondents through a quantitative cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire, with systematic sampling to select participants. Multivariate probit regression identified factors affecting ICT tool choices. Analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between gender, age and language use with smallholder farmers’ preference for using radio. Factors like farm size, off-farm income, and language positively influence the choice of basic cell phones. In contrast, educational level, marital status, and electricity supply negatively influence the choice to use radio and basic cell phones. Network connectivity and ICT awareness positively influence TV use, while household size and ICT costs have a negative effect. Educational level and ICT awareness positively influenced the use of computers and smartphones, whereas age, gender, off-farm income, electricity supply, farm size, household size and network connectivity had a negative influence. When smallholder farmers have access to multiple ICT tools, they can select the most beneficial combination for improving crop productivity. To maximise ICTs’ potential, policymakers should promote inclusive ICT access, awareness and training tailored to farmers’ needs, focusing on affordability, connectivity and literacy to support agricultural information dissemination.

Suggested Citation

  • Melga Meta Ntsoane & Jorine Tafadzwa Ndoro & Ntombovuyo Wayi-Mgwebi, 2025. "Multivariate Probit Model Analysis of the Factors Influencing Smallholder Farmers’ Choice of ICT Tools: A Case Study of Mpumalanga, South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1817-:d:1732962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenxin Leng & Wanglin Ma & Jianjun Tang & Zhongkun Zhu, 2020. "ICT adoption and income diversification among rural households in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(33), pages 3614-3628, June.
    2. David Spielman & Els Lecoutere & Simrin Makhija & Bjorn Van Campenhout, 2021. "Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and Agricultural Extension in Developing Countries," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 177-201, October.
    3. Sandile Jason Mnikathi & Simphiwe Innocentia Hlatshwayo & Ojo Temitope & Mjabuliseni Simon Cloapas Ngidi, 2025. "Participation of Emerging Commercial Farmers in the Strategic Private-Sector Investment Interventions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Christopher Ugochukwu Nwafor & Abiodun A. Ogundeji & Carlu van der Westhuizen, 2020. "Adoption of ICT-Based Information Sources and Market Participation among Smallholder Livestock Farmers in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Eliaza Mkuna & Edilegnaw Wale, 2022. "Explaining Farmers’ Income via Market Orientation and Participation: Evidence from KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Unity Chipfupa & Edilegnaw Wale, 2018. "Farmer typology formulation accounting for psychological capital: implications for on-farm entrepreneurial development," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 600-614, July.
    7. Liebenberg, Frikkie, "undated". "Agricultural Advisory Services in South Africa," Working Papers 241722, University of Pretoria, Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanglin Ma & Huanguang Qiu & Dil Bahadur Rahut, 2023. "Rural development in the digital age: Does information and communication technology adoption contribute to credit access and income growth in rural China?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1421-1444, August.
    2. Bright O. Asante & Wanglin Ma & Stephen Prah & Omphile Temoso, 2024. "Promoting the adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies among maize farmers in Ghana: using digital advisory services," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Yuyang Li & Jiahui Li & Xinjie Li & Qian Lu, 2024. "Does Participation in Digital Supply and Marketing Promote Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption of Green Agricultural Production Technologies?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Xiaoxia Li, 2022. "Research on the Development Level of Rural E-Commerce in China Based on Analytic Hierarchy and Systematic Clustering Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Mwambi, Mercy & Depenbusch, Lutz & Bonnarith, Uon & Sotelo-Cardona, Paola & Kieu, Khemrin & di Tada, Nicolas & Srinivasan, Ramasamy & Schreinemachers, Pepijn, 2023. "Can phone text messages promote the use of integrated pest management? A study of vegetable farmers in Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    6. Yegbemey, Rosaine N. & Bensch, Gunther & Vance, Colin, 2023. "Weather information and agricultural outcomes: Evidence from a pilot field experiment in Benin," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Lili Li & Yiwu Zeng & Zi Ye & Hongdong Guo, 2021. "E‐commerce development and urban‐rural income gap: Evidence from Zhejiang Province, China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(2), pages 475-494, April.
    8. Fang, Lan & Quan, Yurong & Mao, Hui & Chen, Shaojian, 2022. "The Information Communication Technology and Off-farm Employment of Rural Laborers: An Analysis Based on the Micro Data of China Family Panel Studies," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322088, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Chen, Feifei & Qiu, Huanguang & Zhao, Yilin & Wei, Xun & Wan, Xiangyuan, 2024. "Impact of new maize variety adoption on yield and fertilizer input in China: Implications for sustainable food and agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Primrose Madende & Johannes I. F. Henning & Henry Jordaan, 2023. "Accounting for Heterogeneity among Youth: A Missing Link in Enhancing Youth Participation in Agriculture—A South African Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Zheng, Hongyun & Ma, Wanglin & Wang, Fang & Li, Gucheng, 2021. "Does internet use improve technical efficiency of banana production in China? Evidence from a selectivity-corrected analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Kiros Tsegay & Hongzhong Fan & AM Priyangani Adikari & Hailay Shifare, 2021. "Does gender matter for household livelihood diversification in Ethiopia rural areas?," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 221-232, September.
    13. Wale, Edilegnaw & Mkuna, Eliaza, 2023. "Smallholder farmers' satisfaction with the content of agricultural information, and their preferences among the sources: Empirical evidence from Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365950, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    14. Oparinde, Lawrence Olusola, 2023. "ICTs Use, Agroforestry Technologies’ Adoption and Crop Farmers’ Welfare: An Empirical Evidence from Southwest, Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(4), December.
    15. Tadjiev, Abdusame & Kurbanov, Zafar & Djanibekov, Nodir & Govind, Ajit & Akramkhanov, Akmal, 2023. "Determinants and impact of farmers' participation in social media groups: Evidence from irrigated areas of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan," IAMO Discussion Papers 201, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    16. Baloyi, Raesetse & Wale, Edilegnaw & Chipfupa, Unity, . "Rural youth interest in economic activities along the agricultural value chain: empirical evidence from KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) and implications," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(01).
    17. Xiaoxiao Li & Laping Wu & Han Gao & Nanyan Hu, 2024. "Can digital literacy improve organic fertilizer utilization rates?: Empirical evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31921-31946, December.
    18. Dela Maria Ardianti & Djoni Hartono & Putu Angga Widyastaman, 2023. "Offline and hungry: the effect of internet use on the food insecurity of Indonesian agricultural households," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Cai, Yi & Sun, Yucheng & Qi, Wene & Yi, Famin, . "Impact of smartphone use on production outsourcing: evidence from litchi farming in southern China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(4).
    20. Nesrein M. Hashem & Eman M. Hassanein & Jean-François Hocquette & Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes & Fayrouz A. Ahmed & Youssef A. Attia & Khalid A. Asiry, 2021. "Agro-Livestock Farming System Sustainability during the COVID-19 Era: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of Information and Communication Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1817-:d:1732962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.