Author
Listed:
- Qunce Sun
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Ying Wang
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Research Institute of Agricultural Science of the Fifth Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shuanghe 833408, China)
- Shuzhen Zhang
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Xianwei Peng
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Xingyu Ge
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Binghan Wen
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Youping An
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Guili Jin
(College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Yingjun Zhang
(College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)
Abstract
In arid agricultural production, exploring suitable water-saving irrigation strategies and analyzing their water-saving mechanisms are of great significance. Alternating partial root-zone drying irrigation (APRI), a water-saving strategy, enhances the water use efficiency (WUE) of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) This paper aims to clarify the physiological mechanisms by which the APRI method enhances the physiological WUE of alfalfa, as well as the differences between this water-saving irrigation strategy, conventional irrigation (CI), and their water deficit adjustments, in order to seek higher water use efficiency for alfalfa production in arid regions. In this experiment, alfalfa was used as the research subject, and three irrigation methods, CI, fixed partial root-zone drying (FPRI), and APRI, were set up, each paired with three decreasing moisture supply gradients of 90% water holding capacity (WHC) (W1), 70% WHC (W2), and 50% WHC (W3). Samples were taken and observed once after every three complete irrigation cycles. Through a comparative analysis of the growth status, leaf water status, antioxidant enzyme activity, and osmotic adjustment capabilities of alfalfa under different water supplies for the three irrigation strategies, the following conclusions were drawn: First, the APRI method, through artificially created periodic wet–dry cycles in the rhizosphere soil, provides pseudo-drought stress that enhances the osmotic adjustment capabilities and antioxidant enzyme activity of alfalfa leaves during the early to middle phases of irrigation treatment compared to CI and FPRI methods, resulting in healthier leaf water conditions. Secondly, the stronger drought tolerance and superior growth conditions of alfalfa under the APRI method due to reduced water availability are key factors in enhancing the water use efficiency of alfalfa under this strategy.
Suggested Citation
Qunce Sun & Ying Wang & Shuzhen Zhang & Xianwei Peng & Xingyu Ge & Binghan Wen & Youping An & Guili Jin & Yingjun Zhang, 2025.
"Drought Resistance Physiological Responses of Alfalfa to Alternate Partial Root-Zone Drying Irrigation,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:13:p:1446-:d:1695108
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:13:p:1446-:d:1695108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.