IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2024i1p35-d1554013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Government Subsidies and Quality Certification on Farmers’ Adoption of Green Pest Control Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Yuying Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yubin Wang

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Shandong and Henan provinces face significant pest and disease issues, creating a strong demand for green pest control technologies. This paper analyzes the impact of government subsidies and quality certification on farmers’ adoption of green pest control technologies, based on 419 survey responses collected through stratified sampling in Shandong and Henan provinces in 2024, using the Heckman two-stage model. The results show the following: (1) Government subsidies and quality certification significantly promote farmers’ adoption of green pest control technologies, with regression coefficients of 0.260 and 0.493, respectively. (2) An interaction effect exists between government subsidies and quality certification on farmers’ adoption of green pest control technologies, with a coefficient of 0.454. For a given government subsidy, higher quality certification levels increase the likelihood of farmers adopting green pest control technologies. (3) From the perspective of human capital quantity, there is obvious heterogeneity in the impact of government subsidies and quality certification on farmers’ adoption of green pest control technologies. (4) From the perspective of generational differences, quality certification has obvious heterogeneity on farmers’ adoption of green pest control technologies, while there is no obvious generational difference in government subsidies. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a stable and multi-channel government transfer payment system, improve the construction of the agricultural product quality traceability system, take a two-pronged approach, and complement each other’s strengths to build a targeted incentive mechanism based on different groups of farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuying Yang & Yubin Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Government Subsidies and Quality Certification on Farmers’ Adoption of Green Pest Control Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:35-:d:1554013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrik Mouron & Chiara Calabrese & Stève Breitenmoser & Simon Spycher & Robert Baur, 2016. "Sustainability Assessment of Plant Protection Strategies in Swiss Winter Wheat and Potato Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Umar Daraz & Štefan Bojnec & Younas Khan, 2024. "Synergies between Sustainable Farming, Green Technology, and Energy Policy for Carbon-Free Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-41, July.
    3. Precious Dapaah Opoku & Richard Kwasi Bannor & Helena Oppong-Kyeremeh, 2020. "Examining the willingness to produce organic vegetables in the Bono and Ahafo regions of Ghana," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 619-641, May.
    4. Mette Wier & Katherine O'Doherty Jensen & Laura Morch Andersen & Katrin Millock, 2008. "The Character of Demand in Mature Organic Food Markets: Great Britain and Denmark Compared," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00343683, HAL.
    5. Yuxuan Xu & Jie Lyu & Ying Xue & Hongbin Liu, 2022. "Intentions of Farmers to Renew Productive Agricultural Service Contracts Using the Theory of Planned Behavior: An Empirical Study in Northeastern China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Meijun Zhu & Kengcheng Zheng & Baoliu Liu & Fang Jin, 2024. "Can Agricultural Support and Protection Subsidy Policies Promote High-Quality Development of Grain Industry? A Case Study of China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Xiaojing Li & Xianli Xia & Jiazhen Ren, 2022. "Can the Participation in Quality Certification of Agricultural Products Drive the Green Production Transition?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Caswell, Julie A., 1998. "Valuing the benefits and costs of improved food safety and nutrition," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-16.
    9. Ruishi Si & Yumeng Yao & Mingyue Liu, 2023. "Effectiveness of Information Acquisition via the Internet in Standardizing the Use of Antimicrobials by Hog Farmers: Insights from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Shoumin Yue & Ying Xue & Jie Lyu & Kangkang Wang, 2023. "The Effect of Information Acquisition Ability on Farmers’ Agricultural Productive Service Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Corn Farmers in Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Wier, Mette & O'Doherty Jensen, Katherine & Andersen, Laura Mørch & Millock, Katrin, 2008. "The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark compared," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 406-421, October.
    12. Sheng Wu & Shanwei Li, 2024. "Collaboration to Address the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Practicing Organic Agriculture: A Case Study of the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi City, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zib:zbseps:v:2:y:2022:2:1:p:44-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mahnaz Mansoor & Justin Paul, 2022. "Consumers' choice behavior: An interactive effect of expected eudaimonic well‐being and green altruism," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 94-109, January.
    3. Krystyna Mazurek-Łopacińska & Magdalena Sobocińska & Joanna Krupowicz, 2022. "Purchase Motives and Factors Shaping Consumer Behaviour on the Ecological Product Market (Poland Case Study)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Min Liu & Jinxiu Yang & Guoquan Zheng & Ping Shang & Yipei Li, 2023. "External Factors Facilitating Quality Certification of Agricultural Products in China: Insights from Cooperatives in the Sichuan Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Oliver Meixner & Felix Katt, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Consumer Food Safety Perceptions—A Choice-Based Willingness to Pay Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Laura Mørch Andersen & Thomas Bøker Lund, 2011. "Digging deeper: How do different types of organic consumers influence the increasing organic market share?," IFRO Working Paper 2011/15, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    7. Jelena Vapa-Tankosić & Svetlana Ignjatijević & Jelena Kiurski & Jovana Milenković & Irena Milojević, 2020. "Analysis of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Organic and Local Honey in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Vuk Radojević & Mirela Tomaš Simin & Danica Glavaš Trbić & Dragan Milić, 2020. "A Profile of Organic Food Consumers—Serbia Case-Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Blaće, Ante & Čuka, Anica & Šiljković, Željka, 2020. "How dynamic is organic? Spatial analysis of adopting new trends in Croatian agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Hoang Viet Nguyen & Ninh Nguyen & Bach Khoa Nguyen & Antonio Lobo & Phuong Anh Vu, 2019. "Organic Food Purchases in an Emerging Market: The Influence of Consumers’ Personal Factors and Green Marketing Practices of Food Stores," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Eriksson, Mattias & Strid, Ingrid & Hansson, Per-Anders, 2014. "Waste of organic and conventional meat and dairy products—A case study from Swedish retail," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 44-52.
    12. Michael Grimm & Nathalie Luck & Franziska Steinhübel, 2023. "Consumers' willingness to pay for organic rice: Insights from a non‐hypothetical experiment in Indonesia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 83-103, January.
    13. Shahjahan Ali & Shahnaj Akter & Csaba Fogarassy, 2021. "Analysis of Circular Thinking in Consumer Purchase Intention to Buy Sustainable Waste-To-Value (WTV) Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    14. Shahnaj Akter & Shahjahan Ali & Mária Fekete-Farkas & Csaba Fogarassy & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Why Organic Food? Factors Influence the Organic Food Purchase Intension in an Emerging Country (Study from Northern Part of Bangladesh)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Bonfiglio, Andrea & Arzeni, Andrea, 2019. "Spatial distribution of organic farms and territorial context: An application to an Italian rural region," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 8(3), December.
    16. Mausam Budhathoki & Sujita Pandey, 2021. "Intake of Animal-Based Foods and Consumer Behaviour towards Organic Food: The Case of Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Isabel Carrero & Carmen Valor & Estela Díaz & Victoria Labajo, 2021. "Designed to Be Noticed: A Reconceptualization of Carbon Food Labels as Warning Labels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Ankamah-Yeboah, Isaac & Nielsen, Max & Nielsen, Rasmus, 2016. "Price premium of organic salmon in Danish retail sale," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 54-60.
    19. Roman Ostapenko & Yuliia Herasymenko & Vitalii Nitsenko & Svitlana Koliadenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Analysis of Production and Sales of Organic Products in Ukrainian Agricultural Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Francisco José Torres‐Ruiz & Manuela Vega‐Zamora & Manuel Parras‐Rosa, 2018. "Sustainable Consumption: Proposal of a Multistage Model to Analyse Consumer Behaviour for Organic Foods," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 588-602, May.
    21. Alceu Souza & Claudio Kapp Junior & Felipe Rafael Zarpellon & Claudimar Pereira Veiga, 2024. "Sustainable production and consumption: assessing the economic viability of traditional and organic yerba mate cultivation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:35-:d:1554013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.