IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i5p1105-d1152867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chili Pepper Farmers’ Pesticide Use and Residues under Thailand’s Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Case Study in Chiang Mai Province

Author

Listed:
  • Yuichiro Amekawa

    (College of International Relations, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto 603-8577, Japan)

  • Surat Hongsibsong

    (School of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Environmental, Occupational Health Sciences and Non-Communicable Diseases Center of Excellence, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Nootchakarn Sawarng

    (Environmental, Occupational Health Sciences and Non-Communicable Diseases Center of Excellence, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Girma Gezimu Gebre

    (Department of Agribusiness and Value Chain Management, Faculty of Environment, Gender and Development Studies, Hawassa University, Hawassa 05, Ethiopia
    The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto 603-8577, Japan)

Abstract

This multi-level study focuses on Thailand’s public good agricultural practices certification standard (Q-GAP) and compares the performance of 100 certified and 229 uncertified growers regarding their pesticide use practices and the levels of pesticide residues detected in on-farm samples. Chili pepper, a crop primarily marketed domestically, was the focal point of this study conducted in the production context of Chiang Mai province. The data for the study were collected through field interview surveys and chili pepper sample collections. The collected crop samples underwent organophosphate pesticide and synthetic pyrethroid analyses using gas chromatography. Statistical analysis techniques, including one-way ANOVA, chi-square tests, probit regression, and multiple linear regression, were employed to analyze the numerical data using the Stata software. The study’s findings revealed several key points. The certified farmers’ main motivation for adopting Q-GAP was to meet market requirements, rather than ensuring safety assurance. They exhibited a significantly lower adoption of insecticides compared to the uncertified farmers, but no significant differences were observed for fungicide or herbicide adoption. The analysis of the pesticide residue results yielded mixed findings, making it challenging to conclude whether certified farmers have better control over pesticide residues compared to uncertified farmers. A probit regression analysis highlighted the critical importance of training for growers’ adoption of the standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuichiro Amekawa & Surat Hongsibsong & Nootchakarn Sawarng & Girma Gezimu Gebre, 2023. "Chili Pepper Farmers’ Pesticide Use and Residues under Thailand’s Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Case Study in Chiang Mai Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1105-:d:1152867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luong Tinh & Phan Tran Minh Hung & Doan Gia Dzung & Vo Hoang Diem Trinh, 2019. "Determinants of farmers intention` of applying new technology in production: The case of VietGAP standard adoption in Vietnam," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(2), pages 164-148, December.
    2. Yuichiro Amekawa & Sara Bumrungsri & Kanuengnit Wayo & Girma Gezimu Gebre & Surat Hongsibsong, 2022. "Pesticide Use under Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Comparative Study in Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Yuichiro Amekawa & Ng Chuck Chuan & Linda A. Lumayag & Guan Huat Tan & Chee Seng Wong & Lukman B Abdulra’uf & Hui Bing Tan & Wen Xi Tai & She Mei Tan & Chai Hong Liu & Jing Lim Chee, 2017. "Producers’ perceptions of public good agricultural practices and their pesticide use: The case of MyGAP for durian farming in Pahang, Malaysia," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Yuichiro Amekawa & Chantalak Tiyayon & Panamas Treewannakul & Nootchakarn Sawarng, 2022. "Mango Growers’ Compliance with Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Comparative Study in Northern Thailand," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 12(4), pages 260-270.
    5. Luong Tinh & Phan Tran Minh Hung & Doan Gia Dzung & Vo Hoang Diem Trinh, 2019. "Determinants of Farmers’ Intention of Applying New Technology in Production: The Case of Vietgap Standard Adoption in Vietnam," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(2), pages 164-178.
    6. Pepijn Schreinemachers & Iven Schad & Prasnee Tipraqsa & Pakakrong Williams & Andreas Neef & Suthathip Riwthong & Walaya Sangchan & Christian Grovermann, 2012. "Can public GAP standards reduce agricultural pesticide use? The case of fruit and vegetable farming in northern Thailand," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(4), pages 519-529, December.
    7. Wirat Krasachat, 2023. "The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. repec:asi:ajosrd:2017:p:1-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuichiro Amekawa & Sara Bumrungsri & Kanuengnit Wayo & Girma Gezimu Gebre & Surat Hongsibsong, 2022. "Pesticide Use under Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Comparative Study in Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Yuichiro Amekawa & Surat Hongsibsong & Nootchakarn Sawarng & Sumeth Yadoung & Girma Gezimu Gebre, 2021. "Producers’ Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Wirat Krasachat, 2023. "The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Wirat Krasachat & Suthathip Yaisawarng, 2021. "Directional Distance Function Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Christian Grovermann & Sylvain Quiédeville & Adrian Muller & Florian Leiber & Matthias Stolze & Simon Moakes, 2021. "Does organic certification make economic sense for dairy farmers in Europe?–A latent class counterfactual analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 1001-1012, November.
    6. Yuichiro Amekawa, 2016. "Contemporary Quests and Struggles of Small-Scale Family Farms toward Sustainable Agriculture in Thailand," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(5), pages 1-1, May.
    7. Delia Grace, 2015. "Food Safety in Low and Middle Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Hoffmann, Vivian & Moser, Christine & Saak, Alexander, 2019. "Food safety in low and middle-income countries: The evidence through an economic lens," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Mashura Shammi & Nazmul Hasan & Md. Mostafizur Rahman & Kohinoor Begum & Md. Tajuddin Sikder & Mohammad Hossain Bhuiyan & Md. Khabir Uddin, 2017. "Sustainable pesticide governance in Bangladesh: socio-economic and legal status interlinking environment, occupational health and food safety," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 243-260, September.
    10. Grovermann, Christian & Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Berger, Thomas, 2015. "Evaluation of IPM adoption and financial instruments to reduce pesticide use in Thai agriculture using econometrics and agent-based modeling," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211690, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Rattiya Suddeephong Lippe & Ulrike Grote, 2017. "Determinants Affecting Adoption of GLOBALG.A.P. Standards: A Choice Experiment in Thai Horticulture," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 242-256, April.
    12. Abedullah & Shahzad Kouser, 2019. "Evaluating the Factors Determining Pesticide Residues in Vegetables: A Case Study of Lemons Market in Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2019:167, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    13. Shahrina Md Nordin & Sonia Lohana & Siti Nooriza Abd Razak & Vicky Kumar & Rafidah Abdul Rashid & Ammar Redza Ahmad Rizal & Eko Atmadji, 2023. "Identification of Opportunities for Espousing Green Fertilizers Technology Among Smallholder Paddy Farmers for Higher Productivity and Environmental Sustenance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    14. Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "A Copula-Based Meta-Stochastic Frontier Analysis for Comparing Traditional and HDPE Geomembranes Technology in Sea Salt Farming among Farmers in Phetchaburi, Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Grovermann, Christian & Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Riwthong, Suthathip & Berger, Thomas, 2017. "‘Smart’ policies to reduce pesticide use and avoid income trade-offs: An agent-based model applied to Thai agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 91-103.
    16. J. Dara Bloom, 2014. "Civil Society in Hybrid Governance: Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Legitimacy in Mediating Wal-Mart’s Local Produce Supply Chains in Honduras," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1105-:d:1152867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.