IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i4p816-d1113098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Biodegradable Plastic Film on Carbon Footprint of Crop Production

Author

Listed:
  • Baoqing Chen

    (State Engineering Laboratory of Efficient Water Use of Crops and Disaster Loss Mitigation, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Jixiao Cui

    (Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Residual Pollution in Agricultural Film, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Wenyi Dong

    (State Engineering Laboratory of Efficient Water Use of Crops and Disaster Loss Mitigation, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Changrong Yan

    (Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Residual Pollution in Agricultural Film, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Polyethylene film mulch (PM) is a kind of widely used technology to improve crop yields worldwide; however, because of a problem related with plastic residual pollution, it has gradually been replaced by biodegradable plastic film mulch (BDP). Although BDP has helped to solve the plastic residual pollution, its consequences in terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have rarely been revealed. Related knowledge is important for forming low-carbon development strategies for the plastic industry and agriculture. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of BDP on GHG emissions at different stages of its life cycle, and determine whether replacing polyethylene (PE) film with BDP film is a helpful way to reduce national GHG emissions. The results of this study suggest that the application of BDP improved the GHG emissions associated with agricultural inputs, but induced lower GHG emissions at the growing stage and the waste disposal stage, and resulted in lower total area-scale GHG emissions. Compared to the no mulch (NM) cultivation system, the yield-scale carbon footprint was reduced in both the PM and BDP cultivation systems, which meant that both PM and BDP produced lower GHG emissions than NM for the production of the same amount of grain. It was concluded that BDP is not only a measure to control the problem of plastic residue pollution in agriculture, but it can also mitigate the GHG emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Baoqing Chen & Jixiao Cui & Wenyi Dong & Changrong Yan, 2023. "Effects of Biodegradable Plastic Film on Carbon Footprint of Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-9, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:816-:d:1113098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/4/816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/4/816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bulim Choi & Seungwoo Yoo & Su-il Park, 2018. "Carbon Footprint of Packaging Films Made from LDPE, PLA, and PLA/PBAT Blends in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Huang, Fangyuan & Liu, Zihan & Li, Zhaoyang & Wang, Bingfan & Zhang, Peng & Jia, ZhiKuan, 2022. "Is biodegradable film an alternative to polyethylene plastic film for improving maize productivity in rainfed agricultural areas? — Evidence from field experiments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Jiajia Zheng & Sangwon Suh, 2019. "Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 374-378, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Ewelina Włodarczyk, 2023. "Comparison of Carbon Footprint Analysis Methods in Grain Processing—Studies Using Flour Production as an Example," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Weini Chen & Dejun Han & Yu Zhan & Bo Chen, 2025. "The Impact of Rural Population Decline on the Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of the Contiguous Karst Areas in Yunnan–Guizhou Provinces, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Peng Wang & Xuegeng Chen & Haojun Wen, 2023. "Simulation Research on Cotton Stalk Cutting and Crushing Based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA and Field Experiments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Spierling & Venkateshwaran Venkatachalam & Marina Mudersbach & Nico Becker & Christoph Herrmann & Hans-Josef Endres, 2020. "End-of-Life Options for Bio-Based Plastics in a Circular Economy—Status Quo and Potential from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Luca Di Paolo & Simona Abbate & Eliseo Celani & Davide Di Battista & Giovanni Candeloro, 2022. "Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Plastic Items and Their Substitution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Konrad, Kai A. & Lommerud, Kjell Erik, 2021. "Effective climate policy needs non-combustion uses for hydrocarbons," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. N. O. Kapustin & D. A. Grushevenko, 2023. "Assessment of Long-Term Prospects for Demand in the Plastics Market in the Face of Industry Transformation," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 243-253, April.
    5. Quinten Scheers & Philippe Nimmegeers & Or Galant & Sabrina Spatari & Niko Brande & Joost Brancart & Pieter Billen, 2025. "Assessing the Potential of Biodegradable Plastics in a Circular Economy: A Methodological Outlook," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1291-1305, April.
    6. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Ólafur Ögmundarson & Laura Sophie Kalweit & Venkateshwaran Venkatachalam & Rakel Kristjánsdóttir & Hans-Josef Endres & Sebastian Spierling, 2022. "Plastic Packaging Waste Management in Iceland: Challenges and Opportunities from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Nechumi Malovicki-Yaffe & Boaz Hameiri & Leah Bloy & Ram Fishman, 2025. "Environmental taxation triggers persistent psychological resistance to climate policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(1), pages 145-159, March.
    9. Erfan Oliaei & Peter Olsén & Tom Lindström & Lars A. Berglund, 2022. "Highly reinforced and degradable lignocellulose biocomposites by polymerization of new polyester oligomers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Michael Odei Erdiaw‐Kwasie & Kofi Kusi Owusu‐Ansah & Matthew Abunyewah, 2024. "Amplifying circular technological innovation for low greenhouse emissions: Empirical evidence from 30 advanced and emerging economies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3708-3721, August.
    11. Priyadarshi Roy Chowdhury & Himani Medhi & Krishna G. Bhattacharyya & Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain, 2023. "Impacts of emerging and novel plastic waste variants on marine and coastal ecosystems: Challenges and implications on the circular economy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), September.
    12. World Bank, 2023. "Tackling Plastics Pollution," World Bank Publications - Reports 40458, The World Bank Group.
    13. Sijing Zhang & Jingxiang Wang & Dewen Su & Xiao Xiao, 2025. "Facile visible-light upcycling of diverse waste plastics using a single organocatalyst with minimal loadings," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Livia Cabernard & Stephan Pfister & Christopher Oberschelp & Stefanie Hellweg, 2022. "Growing environmental footprint of plastics driven by coal combustion," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(2), pages 139-148, February.
    15. Yuqing Zhang & Shuyuan Liu & Cheng Gao & Jialiang Huang & Huan Liang & Li Zhang & Guangli Xiao & Yi Wu, 2025. "Microplastics in the Typical Mulched Farmland of Sichuan Province: Characteristics That Vary Across Farming Scales and the Risk Significantly Contributed by Priority Polymers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Manh-Tung Ho & Hong-Kong To Nguyen & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2019. "The trilemma of sustainable industrial growth: evidence from a piloting OECD’s Green city," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Aditya Chidepatil & Prabhleen Bindra & Devyani Kulkarni & Mustafa Qazi & Meghana Kshirsagar & Krishnaswamy Sankaran, 2020. "From Trash to Cash: How Blockchain and Multi-Sensor-Driven Artificial Intelligence Can Transform Circular Economy of Plastic Waste?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Hunt, Julian David & Nascimento, Andreas & Nascimento, Nazem & Vieira, Lara Werncke & Romero, Oldrich Joel, 2022. "Possible pathways for oil and gas companies in a sustainable future: From the perspective of a hydrogen economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Arpan D. Patel & Zoé O. G. Schyns & Thomas W. Franklin & Michael P. Shaver, 2024. "Defining quality by quantifying degradation in the mechanical recycling of polyethylene," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    20. M. Millinger & F. Hedenus & E. Zeyen & F. Neumann & L. Reichenberg & G. Berndes, 2025. "Diversity of biomass usage pathways to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 10(2), pages 226-242, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:816-:d:1113098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.