IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i10p1897-d1249337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness and Behavioral Consistency of Chinese Consumers to Purchase Tea via E-Commerce Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Kexiao Xie

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Dongkai Lin

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Weihan Zhu

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Yongqiang Ma

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Jiaxiong Qiu

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China
    Fujian Anxi Tieguanyin Tea Science and Technology Backyard, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Youcheng Chen

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Zhidan Chen

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China
    Fujian Anxi Tieguanyin Tea Science and Technology Backyard, Quanzhou 362406, China
    Fujian Anxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Agricultural Industrial Park, Quanzhou 362406, China
    Engineering Technology and Research Center of Fujian Tea Industry, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

Tea is a global economic crop. In the traditional sales model, the quality of tea is difficult to judge via external clues, and it basically relies on consumers to taste and experience it firsthand. However, currently, most e-commerce platforms can only provide consumers with product information and cannot provide experiential services, which strengthens consumers’ purchasing concerns and makes it difficult for them to take practical actions even if they have the desire to purchase tea online. Therefore, this article is based on a questionnaire survey of consumers in China, the world’s largest tea producing and selling country, using unordered multi classification logistic analysis data and calculating the marginal effect proportion of consistency occurrence. Through data analysis, it is shown that there is a serious inconsistency between consumers’ willingness and behavior in choosing online tea purchases. However, under the influence of some internal and external factors, there will also be positive changes; for example, the level of education, online shopping age, familiarity with tea, convenience, product diversification, online evaluation, and other variables will increase the motivation for consumers to convert their purchase intention into actual behavior. In addition, increasing the level of variables such as age, cultural association, cultural experience, convenience, information reliability, award-winning status, familiarity with tea, product diversity, online evaluation, and service attitude in online shopping can enhance consumers’ willingness to shop online and reduce extreme situations where there is neither intention nor behavior. This study provides evidence from a consumer perspective to enhance the efficiency of tea e-commerce marketing and proposes countermeasures and suggestions based on the research results, which could also provide ideas for marketing strategies for tea or other similar agricultural products.

Suggested Citation

  • Kexiao Xie & Dongkai Lin & Weihan Zhu & Yongqiang Ma & Jiaxiong Qiu & Youcheng Chen & Zhidan Chen, 2023. "Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness and Behavioral Consistency of Chinese Consumers to Purchase Tea via E-Commerce Platforms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1897-:d:1249337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shu Jiang & Zhanpeng Wang & Zilai Sun & Junhu Ruan, 2022. "Determinants of Buying Produce on Short-Video Platforms: The Impact of Social Network and Resource Endowment—Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    3. Ping Qing & Heng Huang & Amar Razzaq & Yifan Tang & Ming Tu, 2018. "Impacts of sellers’ responses to online negative consumer reviews: Evidence from an agricultural product," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(4), pages 587-597, December.
    4. Hai Hu & Andi Cao & Si Chen & Houjian Li, 2022. "Effects of Risk Perception of Pests and Diseases on Tea Famers’ Green Control Techniques Adoption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Jill E. Hobbs, 2020. "Food supply chains during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 68(2), pages 171-176, June.
    6. Bauer, Hans H. & Falk, Tomas & Hammerschmidt, Maik, 2006. "eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 866-875, July.
    7. ming, Luo & GuoHua, Zhou & Wei, Wei, 2021. "Study of the Game Model of E-Commerce Information Sharing in an Agricultural Product Supply Chain based on fuzzy big data and LSGDM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Dowling, Grahame R & Staelin, Richard, 1994. "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 119-134, June.
    9. González, Eva M. & Meyer, Jan-Hinrich & Paz Toldos, M., 2021. "What women want? How contextual product displays influence women’s online shopping behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 625-641.
    10. Liang Xiao & Feipeng Guo & Fumao Yu & Shengnan Liu, 2019. "The Effects of Online Shopping Context Cues on Consumers’ Purchase Intention for Cross-Border E-Commerce Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Ricci, Elena Claire & Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2018. "Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 54-65.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niyazi Gümüº & Özgür Çark, 2021. "The effect of customers’ attitudes towards chatbots on their experience and behavioral intention in Turkey," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(3), pages 420-436.
    2. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    3. Simarpreet Kaur & Sangeeta Arora, 2023. "Understanding customers’ usage behavior towards online banking services: an integrated risk–benefit framework," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 74-98, March.
    4. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    6. Niyazi Gümüº & Özgür Çark, 2021. "The effect of customers’ attitudes towards chatbots on their experience and behavioral intention in Turkey," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(3), pages 420-436.
    7. Yuzong Zhao & Hui Wang & Zhen Guo & Mingli Huang & Yongtao Pan & Yongrui Guo, 2022. "Online Reservation Intention of Tourist Attractions in the COVID-19 Context: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Lemohang Molobi & Sajal Kabiraj & Md. Nur Alam Siddik, 2020. "Behavioural Intention Factors Influencing Sharing Economy Innovations: An Exploratory Research of Uber in South Africa," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 19(1), pages 42-58, June.
    10. Le Duc Toan & Nguyen Huu Phu & Ho Van Nhan & Ho Thi Phi Yen & Nguyen Quang Tam & Le Nguyen Ngoc Anh, 2018. "Technology Acceptance and Future of Internet Banking in Vietnam," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 36-48.
    11. Tsai, Juin-Ming & Hung, Shiu-Wan & Yang, Ting-Ting, 2020. "In pursuit of goodwill? The cross-level effects of social enterprise consumer behaviours," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 350-361.
    12. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    13. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    15. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    16. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    17. Debora Bettiga & Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri, 2020. "Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-214, June.
    18. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    19. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    20. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1897-:d:1249337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.