IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i12p1257-d700216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Reference Standard Process Model for Agriculture to Facilitate Efficient Implementation and Adoption of Precision Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Rok Rupnik

    (Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Večna Pot 113, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Damjan Vavpotič

    (Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Večna Pot 113, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Jurij Jaklič

    (School of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva Ploščad 17, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Aleš Kuhar

    (Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Miroslav Plavšić

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Boštjan Žvanut

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia)

Abstract

Agriculture is a sector that today demands even greater efficiency; thus, it relies extensively on the use of precision agriculture technologies: IoT systems, mobile applications, and other digitalization technologies. Experience from a large-scale EU-funded project with a consortium made up of several software companies shows that software companies have a different and unequal knowledge/understanding of agricultural processes and the use of precision agriculture in agricultural processes. This finding coupled with what is known about the standard process model for IT governance (COBIT) triggered the idea of a reference standard process model for agriculture (RSPMA), which we present in this paper. We applied the Delphi technique to assess the RSPMA and evaluate its potential implementation in the area of agriculture. A panel of 20 members from Slovenia, Romania, Croatia, and Serbia was established for the study. The majority of RSPMA elements were identified as appropriate for the use in agriculture by the panel. The study results show that RSPMA is suitable for use in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Rok Rupnik & Damjan Vavpotič & Jurij Jaklič & Aleš Kuhar & Miroslav Plavšić & Boštjan Žvanut, 2021. "A Reference Standard Process Model for Agriculture to Facilitate Efficient Implementation and Adoption of Precision Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1257-:d:700216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1257/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1257/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathias Kirchmer, 2011. "Reference Models to Empower MPE," Springer Books, in: High Performance Through Process Excellence, chapter 0, pages 87-101, Springer.
    2. Magdalena Gorzelany-Dziadkowiec, 2021. "COVID-19: Business Innovation Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Robertson R.B. Khataza & Atakelty Hailu & Graeme J. Doole & Marit E. Kragt & Arega D. Alene, 2019. "Examining the relationship between farm size and productive efficiency: a Bayesian directional distance function approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 237-246, March.
    4. Uma Lele & Sambuddha Goswami, 2017. "The fourth industrial revolution, agricultural and rural innovation, and implications for public policy and investments: a case of India," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 48(S1), pages 87-100, November.
    5. Alvarez Etxeberria, Igor & Garayar, Ainhoa & Calvo Sánchez, José Antonio, 2015. "Development of sustainability reports for farming operations in the Basque Country using the Delphi method," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 44-54.
    6. Mathias Kirchmer, 2011. "High Performance Through Process Excellence," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-21165-2, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Monteleone & Edmilson Alves de Moraes & Roberto Max Protil & Brenno Tondato de Faria & Rodrigo Filev Maia, 2024. "Proposal of a Model of Irrigation Operations Management for Exploring the Factors That Can Affect the Adoption of Precision Agriculture in the Context of Agriculture 4.0," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Gonçalo C. Rodrigues, 2022. "Precision Agriculture: Strategies and Technology Adoption," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-4, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wirat Krasachat & Suthathip Yaisawarng, 2021. "Directional Distance Function Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Chandra S. R. Nuthalapati & Chaitanya Nuthalapati, 2021. "Has Open Innovation Taken Root in India? Evidence from Startups Working in Food Value Chains," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    3. Zhe Zhao & Pengyu Peng & Fan Zhang & Jiayin Wang & Hongxuan Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Urbanization Process on Agricultural Technical Efficiency in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Engida, Tadesse Getacher & Rao, Xudong & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2020. "A dynamic by-production framework for analyzing inefficiency associated with corporate social responsibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1170-1179.
    5. Yuanyuan Zhu & Yukuan Wang & Bin Fu & Qin Liu & Ming Li & Kun Yan, 2021. "How Are Rural Youths’ Agricultural Skills? Empirical Results and Implications in Southwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Ana Alvarenga & Florinda Matos & Radu Godina & João C. O. Matias, 2020. "Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Tatjana Kosić & Slavica Stamatović Vučković & Kosara Kujundžić, 2023. "A Platform of Critical Barriers to Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, May.
    8. Gulzhanat Akhanova & Abid Nadeem & Jong R. Kim & Salman Azhar, 2019. "A Framework of Building Sustainability Assessment System for the Commercial Buildings in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    9. S. Mahendra Dev, 2018. "Tranformation of Indian agriculture: Growth, iclusiveness and sustainability," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2018-026, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    10. Robert M. Chiles & Garrett Broad & Mark Gagnon & Nicole Negowetti & Leland Glenna & Megan A. M. Griffin & Lina Tami-Barrera & Siena Baker & Kelly Beck, 2021. "Democratizing ownership and participation in the 4th Industrial Revolution: challenges and opportunities in cellular agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 943-961, December.
    11. Shortall, Ruth & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Axelsson, Guðni, 2015. "A sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy projects: Development in Iceland, New Zealand and Kenya," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 372-407.
    12. Adeyemo, Temitayo, 2021. "The 4th Industrial Revolution: What Role Does Infrastructure Play in Livelihood Choices and Outcomes of Agrarian Households?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315136, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Kibrom A. Abay & Lina Abdelfattah & Hoda El‐Enbaby & Mai Mahmoud & Clemens Breisinger, 2022. "Plot size and sustainable input intensification in smallholder irrigated agriculture: Evidence from Egypt," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(5), pages 792-810, September.
    14. Rehn, Roland, 2013. "Change Controlling: Suggestions for the design of Change Controlling," Journal of Applied Leadership and Management, Hochschule Kempten - University of Applied Sciences, Professional School of Business & Technology, vol. 2, pages 52-71.
    15. Georgios Bartzas & Konstantinos Komnitsas, 2020. "Environmental Risk Assessment in Agriculture: The Example of Pistacia vera L. Cultivation in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Juan Lin & Han Li & Mingshui Lin & Chuhai Li, 2022. "Rural e‐commerce in China: Spatial dynamics of Taobao Villages development in Zhejiang Province," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1082-1101, September.
    17. Himani Mishra & Prateek Maheshwari, 2020. "Achieving sustainable development goals through Fourth Industrial Revolution: An Indian perspective," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 11(2), pages 63-75, May.
    18. Qiuxia Qin & Hongdong Guo & Xinjie Shi & Kevin Chen, 2023. "Rural E‐commerce and County Economic Development in China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(5), pages 26-60, September.
    19. Adam G. Pfleegor & Matthew Katz & Matthew T. Bowers, 2019. "Publish, Perish, or Salami Slice? Authorship Ethics in an Emerging Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 189-208, April.
    20. José Alex Gualotuña Parra & Ana M. Tarquis & Juan B. Grau Olivé & Federico Colombo Speroni & Antonio Saa-Requejo, 2021. "An Analytical Approach to Assess the Influence of Expert Panel Answer on Decision Making: The Case of Sustainable Land Use in Ribadavia Banda Norte, Salta (Argentina)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1257-:d:700216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.