IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v10y2020i3p42-d383650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Structural Empowerment to Employee-Driven Innovation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment

Author

Listed:
  • Chukwuemeka Echebiri

    (Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer Campus, 2626 Lillehammer, Norway)

  • Stein Amundsen

    (Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer Campus, 2626 Lillehammer, Norway)

  • Marit Engen

    (Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer Campus, 2626 Lillehammer, Norway)

Abstract

This paper aims to link structural empowerment to employee-driven innovation (EDI) with psychological empowerment as a mediation mechanism. Recently, there has been an increase in interest in utilizing all sources of knowledge in an organization to stimulate innovation among all employees. A clear understanding of some of the mechanisms used to achieve this is needed. The paper applies a quantitative approach based on two studies. Study 1 involved a total of 228 employees in a public sector organization, while study 2 involved 60 employees from a private sector organization. We employed structural equation modeling to test the hypothesized relationships among the variables. It was determined that both structural empowerment and psychological empowerment have a direct positive association with EDI. Second, the relationship between structural empowerment and EDI was partially mediated by psychological empowerment. EDI can only happen in an organization if employers and managers empower the ordinary employees to not only generate creative ideas but also to participate in its development and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chukwuemeka Echebiri & Stein Amundsen & Marit Engen, 2020. "Linking Structural Empowerment to Employee-Driven Innovation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:42-:d:383650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/3/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/3/42/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tone Merethe Aasen & Oscar Amundsen & Leif Jarle Gressgård & Kåre Hansen, 2012. "In Search of Best Practices for Employee-Driven Innovation: Experiences from Norwegian Work Life," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Steen Høyrup & Maria Bonnafous-Boucher & Cathrine Hasse & Maja Lotz & Kirsten Møller (ed.), Employee-Driven Innovation, chapter 3, pages 57-74, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Per Carlborg & Daniel Kindström & Christian Kowalkowski, 2014. "The evolution of service innovation research: a critical review and synthesis," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 373-398, March.
    3. Snyder, Hannah & Witell, Lars & Gustafsson, Anders & Fombelle, Paul & Kristensson, Per, 2016. "Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2401-2408.
    4. Izabelle Bäckström & Malin Lindberg, 2018. "Behavioural Implications Of Employee-Driven Innovation — A Critical Discourse Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Alan C. Acock, 2013. "Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number dsemus, March.
    6. Eveliina Saari & Mikko Lehtonen & Marja Toivonen, 2015. "Making bottom-up and top-down processes meet in public innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 325-344, April.
    7. Anke Buhl, 2018. "Do it yourself - a lean startup toolbox for employee-driven green product innovation," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4/5), pages 526-544.
    8. Farinaz Havaei & V. Susan Dahinten, 2017. "How Well Does the CWEQ II Measure Structural Empowerment? Findings from Applying Item Response Theory," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Søren Voxted, 2018. "Conditions of implementation of employee-driven innovation," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4/5), pages 471-488.
    10. Sea-Jin Chang & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Lorraine Eden, 2010. "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 178-184, February.
    11. Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah & Gustafsson, Anders & Fombelle, Paul & Kristensson, Per, 2016. "Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2863-2872.
    12. Marko Sarstedt & Jun-Hwa Cheah, 2019. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: a software review," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(3), pages 196-202, September.
    13. Jean Hartley, 2005. "Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 27-34, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Maria José Madeira, 2021. "Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship—Introduction," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-5, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bourke, Jane & Roper, Stephen & Love, James H., 2020. "Innovation in legal services: The practices that influence ideation and codification activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 132-147.
    2. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Gomes, Emanuel, 2023. "Treble innovation firms: Antecedents, outcomes, and enhancing factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Villani, Elisa & Linder, Christian & Lechner, Christian & Muller, Lina, 2021. "How do non-innovative firms start innovation and build legitimacy? The case of professional service firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 614-625.
    5. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    6. Opland, Leif Erik & Pappas, Ilias O. & Engesmo, Jostein & Jaccheri, Letizia, 2022. "Employee-driven digital innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 255-271.
    7. Chu, Zhaofang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun, 2018. "Logistics service innovation by third party logistics providers in China: Aligning guanxi and organizational structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 291-307.
    8. Witell, Lars & Gebauer, Heiko & Jaakkola, Elina & Hammedi, Wafa & Patricio, Lia & Perks, Helen, 2017. "A bricolage perspective on service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 290-298.
    9. VGR Chandran & Tariq Ahmed & Fedwa Jebli & Alexander Josiassen & Eva Lang, 2024. "Developing innovation capability in the hotel industry, who and what is important? A mixed methods approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(3), pages 728-748, May.
    10. Vrontis, Demetris & Christofi, Michael, 2021. "R&D internationalization and innovation: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 812-823.
    11. Yao Wu & Satish Nambisan & Jinghua Xiao & Kang Xie, 2022. "Consumer resource integration and service innovation in social commerce: the role of social media influencers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 429-459, May.
    12. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Gomes, Emanuel, 2020. "Unpacking the effect of strategic ambidexterity on performance: A cross-country comparison of MMNEs developing product-service innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    13. Machado Léo, Ricardo & Tello‐Gamarra, Jorge, 2016. "Inovac¸ão em servic¸os: estado da arte e perspectivas futuras [Innovation in services: state of the art and future perspectives]," MPRA Paper 82195, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 Mar 2017.
    14. Johansson, A. Elisabeth & Raddats, Chris & Witell, Lars, 2019. "The role of customer knowledge development for incremental and radical service innovation in servitized manufacturers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 328-338.
    15. Benoit, Sabine & Wang, Yonggui & Teng, Lefa & Hampson, Daniel P. & Li, Xia, 2022. "Innovation in the sharing economy: A framework and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 207-216.
    16. Alexander Frey & Manuel Trenz & Daniel Veit, 2019. "A service-dominant logic perspective on the roles of technology in service innovation: uncovering four archetypes in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1149-1189, December.
    17. Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Fifteen advances in service innovation studies," Chapters, in: Ada Scupola & Lars Fuglsang (ed.), Services, Experiences and Innovation, chapter 3, pages 39-65, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Marta Barna1 & Bohdan Semak, 2020. "Main Trends Of Marketing Innovations Development Of International Tour Operating," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(5).
    19. Cem Işık & Ekrem Aydın & Tarik Dogru & Abdul Rehman & Ercan Sirakaya-Turk & Deniz Karagöz, 2022. "Innovation Research in Tourism and Hospitality Field: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Mohammed Saeed Alahbabi & Hassan Saleh Al-Dhaafri, 2022. "The Mechanism of Employee Empowerment in Enhancing Service Innovation," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(5), pages 1-1, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:42-:d:383650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.