IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedfel/96415.html

Why Immigration Is an Urban Phenomenon

Author

Abstract

Immigration is fundamentally an urban phenomenon. Both in the United States and elsewhere, immigrants settle primarily in cities—especially high-wage, high cost-of-living cities. The most likely reason is that immigrants often send a significant share of their income back to their origin country. As a result, they value a city’s high wages and are less discouraged by the high living costs than native-born workers. Migration policies can reinforce this urban concentration pattern.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Monras, 2023. "Why Immigration Is an Urban Phenomenon," FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, vol. 2023(16), pages 1-5, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedfel:96415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.frbsf.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/el2023-16.pdf
    File Function: Full text - article PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glaeser, Edward L., 2008. "Cities, Agglomeration, and Spatial Equilibrium," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199290444.
    2. Joan Monras, 2020. "Immigration and Wage Dynamics: Evidence from the Mexican Peso Crisis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(8), pages 3017-3089.
    3. Christoph Albert & Joan Monras, 2022. "Immigration and Spatial Equilibrium: The Role of Expenditures in the Country of Origin," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(11), pages 3763-3802, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caballero, María Esther & Cadena, Brian C. & Kovak, Brian K., 2023. "The international transmission of local economic shocks through migrant networks," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Joseph-Simon Görlach, 2023. "Borrowing Constraints and the Dynamics of Return and Repeat Migration," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 205-243.
    3. Christoph Albert & Joan Monràs, 2019. "The regional impact of economic shocks: Why immigration is different from import competition," Economics Working Papers 1758, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Dec 2020.
    4. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/6g9o9cr3pl8c1p3gnsu388c9bj is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Davis, Donald R. & Dingel, Jonathan I., 2020. "The comparative advantage of cities," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Julien Champagne & Erik Ens & Xing Guo & Olena Kostyshyna & Alexander Lam & Corinne Luu & Sarah Miller & Patrick Sabourin & Joshua Slive & Temel Taskin & Jaime Trujillo & Shu Lin Wee, 2023. "Assessing the effects of higher immigration on the Canadian economy and inflation," Staff Analytical Notes 2023-17, Bank of Canada.
    7. Michal Burzynski & Giovanni Peri, 2024. "Natives Sorting and the Impact of Immigration on European Labor Markets," LISER Working Paper Series 2024-09, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    8. Joan Monràs, 2025. "Immigrant Assimilation Beyond the Labor Market," Working Papers 1517, Barcelona School of Economics.
    9. Amior, Michael & Stuhler, Jan, 2023. "Immigration, Monopsony and the Distribution of Firm Pay," CEPR Discussion Papers 18709, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Glitz, Albrecht & Hörnig, Lukas & Körner, Konstantin & Monras, Joan, 2023. "The geography of refugee shocks," Ruhr Economic Papers 994, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    11. Fiaschi, Davide & Tealdi, Cristina, 2020. "Winners and Losers of Immigration," IZA Discussion Papers 13600, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Joan Monras, 2015. "Economic Shocs and Internal Migration," Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers hal-03460018, HAL.
    13. Joan Monràs, 2025. "Immigrant assimilation beyond the labor market," Economics Working Papers 1921, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    14. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6g9o9cr3pl8c1p3gnsu388c9bj is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Imre Lengyel, 2011. "Types of competitiveness of Hungarian regions: agglomeration economies and endogenous regional development," ERSA conference papers ersa11p674, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Mark Thissen & Frank Van Oort, 2010. "European Place‐Based Development Policy And Sustainable Economic Agglomeration," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(4), pages 473-480, September.
    17. Saul Estrin & Yuan Hu & Daniel Shapiro & Peng Zhang, 2024. "Agglomeration costs limit sustainable innovation in cities in developing economies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    19. Sachs, Dominik & Colas, Mark, 2020. "The Indirect Fiscal Benefits of Low-Skilled Immigration," CEPR Discussion Papers 15325, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Joan Monras, 2019. "Minimum Wages and Spatial Equilibrium: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(3), pages 853-904.
    21. Oliver W. Lerbs, 2014. "House prices, housing development costs, and the supply of new single-family housing in German counties and cities," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 183-210, September.
    22. John Gathergood & Fabian Gunzinger & Benedict Guttman-Kenney & Edika Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2020. "Levelling Down and the COVID-19 Lockdowns: Uneven Regional Recovery in UK Consumer Spending," Papers 2012.09336, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedfel:96415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Research Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbsfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.