Role of Demographic Characteristics on Job Satisfaction
The cross-sectional study attempts to examine the relationship between Demographic Characteristics and job satisfaction among academic staff of public and private sectors universities in Pakistan. There were 132 universities in Pakistan, in which 73 public sectors and 59 from private sectors. This study was conducted in Punjab Province in which total number of universities was 40 which includes 22 public and 18 private sectors. This study considered all public and private sector universities which were working in Punjab Province of Pakistan. Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire by Weiss, et al., was adopted and few items added to measure demographic characteristics. The questionnaire was pretested in seven universities of Punjab Province before final data collection. For data analysis Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) were used. The studied population was 6327 academic staff which comprises Lecturers, Assistant Professors, Associate Professors and Professors. The sample size was 310 academic staff and usable questionnaires were 299 which were 96.45% of total sample size. The cronbach’s alpha of the instrument was .852 which was above acceptable range. It was found there was not too much difference in job satisfaction on the basis of demographic characteristics. But, male academic staffs were slightly more satisfied than their counterpart. The permanent academic staffs were more satisfied than contractual academic staff. The academic staffs with PhD’s degree were more satisfied with job than academic staff with MPhil, Master and Bachelor (Hons) degree. The academic staffs with high net monthly salary were found more satisfied than those who were earning less monthly salary. The experienced faculty members were more satisfied than less experienced. It was also found age and job satisfaction was not positively correlated with each other’s. The academic staffs from private sector universities were comparatively more satisfied with overall job satisfaction than that of public sector universities. The findings of this study are helpful for administration of the concerned universities, Ministry of Education and Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for policy formulation regarding human assets.
Volume (Year): 6 No 1 Paper 1 January (2012)
Issue (Month): 3 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.fareastjournals.com/journal_detail.aspx?jid=18|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2005.
"Public sector efficiency: An international comparison,"
Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 321-347, June.
- Afonso, António & Schuknecht, Ludger & Tanzi, Vito, 2003. "Public sector efficiency: an international comparison," Working Paper Series 0242, European Central Bank.
- Krueger, Anne O, 1974. "The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(3), pages 291-303, June.
- Nadeem Ul Haque & Ratna Sahay, 1996. "Do Government Wage Cuts Close Budget Deficits? Costs of Corruption," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 43(4), pages 754-778, December.
- Zaheer, Arshad & Rehman, Kashif ur & Saif, M. Iqbal, 2008. "Development and testing of a business process efficiency scale," MPRA Paper 54467, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 1975. "The economics of corruption," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 187-203, February.
- António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2005. "Public sector efficiency: An international comparison," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 321-347, June.
- Schuknecht, Ludger & Tanzi, Vito & Afonso, António, 2003. "Public sector efficiency: an international comparison," Working Paper Series 242, European Central Bank.
- International Monetary Fund, 1998. "Public Sector Efficiency and Fiscal Austerity," IMF Working Papers 98/56, International Monetary Fund. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fej:articl:v:6a:y:2012:i:3:p:30-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jim Chau)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.