IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/467.html

Fostering Public Trust and Accountability in Public Healthcare: The Role of Transparency, Integrity, and Independence in Internal Audit Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Fahmi Natigor Nasution

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study examines how transparency, independence, and integrity contribute to strengthening internal audit quality within public healthcare governance. Positioned within broader discussions of public trust, institutional accountability, and ethical governance in developing-country contexts, the study investigates the role of integrity as a moderating factor in the relationship between transparency, independence, and internal audit quality. Using a quantitative explanatory design, data were collected from 320 respondents across 36 public hospitals in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia, representing hospital directors, deputy directors, heads of finance, planning, medical services, supervision, and administrative units. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate both direct and moderating effects. The findings reveal that transparency and independence positively and significantly influence internal audit quality, indicating that accountable and autonomous oversight mechanisms are essential for strengthening governance effectiveness in public healthcare institutions. The study also finds that integrity does not moderate the relationship between transparency and audit quality, suggesting that transparency functions as an institutionalized governance mechanism independent of individual ethical characteristics. However, integrity significantly strengthens the relationship between independence and internal audit quality, highlighting the importance of ethical values in ensuring effective and trustworthy oversight. These findings contribute to broader social science discussions concerning institutional legitimacy, governance reform, and the delivery of accountable public welfare services in transitional and developing governance systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Fahmi Natigor Nasution, 2026. "Fostering Public Trust and Accountability in Public Healthcare: The Role of Transparency, Integrity, and Independence in Internal Audit Governance," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:467
    DOI: 10.26417/z31dvj91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/3599
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v13_i2_26/Nasution.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/z31dvj91?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. M.P. Swann, 2009. "The Economics of Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13211.
    2. Pol, Eduardo & Ville, Simon, 2009. "Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 878-885, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    2. Sriroop Chaudhuri & Mimi Roy & Louis M. McDonald & Yves Emendack, 2021. "Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2973-3008, March.
    3. Paul Windrum & Doris Schartinger & Luis Rubalcaba & Faiz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2016. "The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 150-166, May.
    4. Ayla ESEN & Ozen ASIK-DIZDAR, 2014. "Regional Innovation As Part Of Regional Development Agenda In Turkey: The Role Of Development Agencies," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 14(1), pages 145-158.
    5. Daniel Alonso‐Martínez & Nuria González‐Álvarez & Mariano Nieto, 2019. "The influence of financial performance on corporate social innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 859-871, July.
    6. Joanna Woronkowicz, 2021. "Arts, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 519-526, December.
    7. Susanna Ulinski, 2015. "Corporate Social Innovation as a Driver of Performance and Welfare. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 25," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58500.
    8. Francisco Diniz & Hamilton Vale Leitão, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in Training and Human Capital Development: the Case of the Bank Palmas," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 865-874.
    9. Banu Demirel & Ayça Kübra Hızarcı Payne, 2018. "Social Innovation Adoption Behavior: The Case of Zumbara," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Chiara Cannavale & Lorenza Claudio & Michele Simoni, 2021. "How social innovations spread globally through the process of reverse innovation: a case-study from the South Korea," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(4), pages 421-440, December.
    11. Ramona CANTARAGIU & Carmen PĂUNESCU & Shahrazad HADAD, 2014. "The social impact of university entrepreneurship in Romania: Is the institutional discourse replicated or adapted?," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 9(4), Winter.
    12. Iván Darío Hernández & Oscar S�nchez, 2014. "Innovación social abierta en el diseno de una política y estrategia de formalización sostenible: un caso colombiano de gobierno colaborativo," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(2), pages 47-61.
    13. Fabien Martinez & Patrick O'Sullivan & Mark A. Smith & Mark Esposito, 2017. "Perspectives on the role of business in social innovation," Post-Print hal-02887662, HAL.
    14. Sara Calvo Martínez & Andrés Morales Pachón & José María Martín Martín & Valentín Molina Moreno, 2019. "Solidarity Economy, Social Enterprise, and Innovation Discourses: Understanding Hybrid Forms in Postcolonial Colombia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Marina Novikova, 2022. "Social Innovation Impacts and Their Assessment: An Exploratory Study of a Social Innovation Initiative from a Portuguese Rural Region," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    16. Iizuka, Michiko, 2013. "Innovation systems framework: still useful in the new global context?," MERIT Working Papers 2013-005, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Sayem Hossain & M. Abu Saleh & Judy Drennan, 0. "A critical appraisal of the social entrepreneurship paradigm in an international setting: a proposed conceptual framework," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    18. Pedro Marques & Kevin Morgan & Ranald Richardson, 2018. "Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(3), pages 496-512, May.
    19. Bhatt, Punita & Ahmad, Ali J. & Roomi, Muhammad Azam, 2016. "Social innovation with open source software: User engagement and development challenges in India," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 52, pages 28-39.
    20. Faiz Gallouj & Luis Rubalcaba & Marja Toivonen & Paul Windrum, 2018. "Understanding social innovation in services industries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 551-569, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.