IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxy2017i3ap920-930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and its Impact on the Competitiveness of Latvia

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts Skapars
  • Sandra Jekabsone
  • Janis Priede
  • Irina Skribane

Abstract

Productivity is the main key factor for Latvia to increased prosperity, ensuring efficient use of resources. Due to limited availability of resources and the increasing competition in the global markets, it is important for Latvia to support its economic growth through increased productivity.Since 2010 the productivity of Latvia's economy has been at the level of 40-45% of the EU average (Eurostat Database, 2017). A further increase in labour costs is inevitable in the open labour market conditions, therefore, strengthening the competitiveness of Latvian is largely determined by the ability to reduce the productivity gap with the advanced economies.One of the main challenges for Latvia is the creation of new competitive advantages that are associated with investments in the latest technologies, innovation, research, human capital, efficient allocation of resources and redistribution that comes with the behavioural changes of economic subjects. Economic structural transformation process is largely dependent on the quality of the institutional framework, which provides goods and resources market efficiency, minimizing the redistribution process costs and risks, thereby strengthening the country's competitive benefits.The aim of the research is to assess the potential for productivity growth to improve competitiveness of Latvia to identify the main obstacles that limit the attraction of resources and redistribution of higher value-added products and prepare recommendations for policies on the micro, sectoral and macro level.Research has high practical value that is related to OECD recommendation to monitor productivity in Latvia.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts Skapars & Sandra Jekabsone & Janis Priede & Irina Skribane, 2017. "Productivity and its Impact on the Competitiveness of Latvia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 920-930.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:920-930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-3-a-63.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel HavlÃ­Ä ek & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Liliana Berezkinova, 2013. "Innovation Management and Controlling in SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 57-70.
    2. Yoruk, BarIs K. & Zaim, Osman, 2005. "Productivity growth in OECD countries: A comparison with Malmquist indices," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 401-420, June.
    3. repec:wsi:jicepx:v:06:y:2015:i:03:n:s1793993315500131 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:eee:streco:v:41:y:2017:i:c:p:53-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Hartwig, Jochen, 2015. "Structural change, aggregate demand and employment dynamics in the OECD, 1970–2010," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 36-45.
    6. Mahlberg, Bernhard & Luptacik, Mikulas & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2011. "Examining the drivers of total factor productivity change with an illustrative example of 14 EU countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 60-69.
    7. Pavla Breckova, 2016. "SMEs Export Activities in the Czech Republic and Export Risk Insuring," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 84-92.
    8. S.G. Tyaglov & T.V. Kushnarenko & A.A. Khokhlov & M.A. Qeropyan, 2017. "The Development of Cluster Relations within the State and Business Structures in Terms of Strategy of Non-Primary Sector Import-Substitution," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 198-207.
    9. Elena Ryzhkova & Nikolai Prosvirkin, 2015. "Cluster Initiatives as a Competitiveness Factor of Modern Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 21-30.
    10. Fernando Gabriel Im & David Rosenblatt, 2015. "Middle-Income Traps: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 1-39.
    11. E.A. Ivanova & M.M. Mackay & T.K. Platonova & N.V. Elagina, 2017. "Theoretical Basis for Composition of Economic Strategy for Industry Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1).
    12. repec:ers:journl:v:xvi:y:2013:i:sisme:p:57-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Harada, Tsutomu, 2015. "Structural change and economic growth with relation-specific investment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Maudos, Joaqui­n & Pastor, José Manuel & Serrano, Lorenzo, 2008. "Explaining the US-EU productivity growth gap: Structural change vs. intra-sectoral effect," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 311-313, August.
    15. Lopez-Rodriguez, Jesus & Martinez-Lopez, Diego, 2017. "Looking beyond the R&D effects on innovation: The contribution of non-R&D activities to total factor productivity growth in the EU," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 37-45.
    16. Eleftherios I. Thalassinos & Bozhana Venediktova & Daniela Staneva-Petkova & Vicky Zampeta, 2013. "Way of Banking Development Abroad: Branches or Subsidiaries," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 69-78.
    17. Minniti, Antonio & Venturini, Francesco, 2017. "The long-run growth effects of R&D policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 316-326.
    18. V.M. Dzhukha & A.N. Kokin & A.S. Li & T.Yu. Sinyuk, 2017. "Research and Development Intensity in Business: Russia and EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 64-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:920-930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marios Agiomavritis) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Marios Agiomavritis to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://www.ersj.eu/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.