IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i3p1373-1390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Essence and Measurement of a Competitive Advantage

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Urbanek

Abstract

Purpose: Despite its fundamental importance for management science, sustainable competitive advantage must be better defined and conceptualized. Apart from the terminological confusion, the lack of an agreed-upon definition of this term leads to several theoretical and practical problems. The article aims to clarify the concept of competitive advantage in its semantic content and operationalization. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employs a qualitative research methodology grounded in a comprehensive literature review, logical inference, and insights derived from the researcher’s previous studies. The approach aims to synthesize existing knowledge with personal observations, highlighting patterns and developing a refined theoretical framework. Findings: This article identifies several drawbacks relating to the current understanding of competitive advantage that creates a need for an unambiguous definition of this concept that could be utilized in both empirical research and management practice. The article proposes a univocal definition of the term sustainable competitive advantage and its measurement. The Author proposes a distinction between the three concepts: advantage, competitive advantage, and sustainable competitive advantage. Practical/Implications: The proposal's contribution to developing the theory and practice of strategic management embraces two aspects. First, in the presented concept, the reference point of the company's activities to create a sustainable competitive advantage is value creation for customers and value capture for the company, with the secondary role of outperforming competitors. Secondly, a univocal measure of sustainable competitive advantage is submitted – the enterprise value to invested capital ratio (EV/IC). Adopting an EV/IC ratio based on economic profits as a measure of sustainable competitive advantage gives managers a helpful tool for making decisions about the efficient allocation of resources. When deciding whether to enter a new market, offer new products, restructure assets, engage in the acquisition, or invest in research and development or brand building, managers should analyze the impact of these decisions on the competitive advantage demonstrated by future economic profits. For researchers, the EV/IC ratio and economic profits can serve as endogenous variables in research on the determinants of competitive advantage. Originality/Value: To the best of our knowledge, the proposed concept is the first attempt in the subject literature that links the definition of sustainable competitive advantage with, simultaneously, knowledge building, value creation for customers, and value maximization as the primary objective of a company. The Author explains in detail the differences between concepts of advantage and proposes measures to analyze their types.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Urbanek, 2024. "The Essence and Measurement of a Competitive Advantage," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1373-1390.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1373-1390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3842/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. D'Aveni & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Ken G. Smith, 2010. "The age of temporary advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1371-1385, December.
    2. Thomas C. Powell, 2001. "Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 875-888, September.
    3. Sidney G. Winter, 2003. "Understanding dynamic capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 991-995, October.
    4. Scott L. Newbert, 2007. "Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-146, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brown, Richard S., 2017. "Scanning and updating failure: How AT&T turned its political capability into a core rigidity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 71-89.
    2. Nayak, Bishwajit & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar & Krishnamoorthy, Bala, 2022. "Exploring the black box of competitive advantage – An integrated bibliometric and chronological literature review approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 964-982.
    3. Papazoglou, Michalis E. & Spanos, Yiannis E., 2021. "“Influential knowledge and financial performance: The role of time and rivals’ absorptive capacity”," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen & Spender, JC & Groen, Aard, 2009. "The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques," MPRA Paper 21442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    6. Richard J. Arend & Moren Lévesque, 2010. "Is the Resource-Based View a Practical Organizational Theory?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 913-930, August.
    7. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Stav Fainshmidt & Amir Pezeshkan & M. Lance Frazier & Anil Nair & Edward Markowski, 2016. "Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Extension," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1348-1380, December.
    9. Sven Kunisch & Markus Menz & David Collis, 2020. "Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: an organization design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-32, December.
    10. Ferreira, João J.M. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F., 2022. "What makes organizations unique? Looking inside the box," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 664-674.
    11. Alar Kolk & Kristi P¸¸mann, 2008. "Co-Development of Open Innovation Strategy and Dynamic Capabilities as a Source of Corporate Growth," Working Papers 173, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology.
    12. Miočević, Dario & Talaja, Anita & Alfirević, Nikša, 2021. "Disentangling performance outcomes of a firm’s innovativeness: A resource-advantage perspective," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(3), pages 392-414.
    13. Abdulrahman Al–Aali & David J. Teece, 2014. "International Entrepreneurship and the Theory of the (Long–Lived) International Firm: A Capabilities Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(1), pages 95-116, January.
    14. Wu Zhan & Roger (Rongxin) Chen, 2013. "Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 601-632, June.
    15. Marijana Srećković, 2018. "The performance effect of network and managerial capabilities of entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 807-824, April.
    16. Manfred Moldaschl & Dirk Fischer, 2004. "Beyond the Management View: A Ressource-Centered Socio-Economic Perspective," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 122-151.
    17. Perren, Lew, 2013. "Strategic discourses of ‘competitive advantage’: Comparing social representation of causation in academia and practice," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 235-246.
    18. Lars Matysiak & Alan M. Rugman & Andreas Bausch, 2018. "Dynamic Capabilities of Multinational Enterprises: The Dominant Logics Behind Sensing, Seizing, and Transforming Matter!," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 225-250, April.
    19. Yulia N. Hristova, 2021. "Sustainability of competitive positioning and challenges for intermediaries in the new car market in Bulgaria," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 67-80, July.
    20. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Linder, Christian, 2020. "New venture formation: A capability configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 290-302.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainable competitive advantage; value creation; economic profit; enterprise value/invested capital ratio (EV/IC).;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1373-1390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.