IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i3p420-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remote Work and Work Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Kalinowska
  • Elzbieta Noworol-Luft

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this article is to analyze the relationship between remote work and work efficiency, including both productivity and work-life balance dimensions. In light of the structural shift toward hybrid and remote models triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic, the study investigates how telework affects task performance, autonomy, motivation, and stress levels. The analysis incorporates both theoretical frameworks (agency theory, human capital theory, transaction cost theory) and empirical data. The article also presents two research hypotheses: H1: Employees working remotely perceive a higher level of work efficiency than those working in a traditional office setting; H2: Remote work contributes positively to employees’ work-life balance, reducing perceived stress and increasing job satisfaction. Design/Methodology/Approach: The article combines a theoretical review with empirical research based on a structured survey. The questionnaire included 15 diagnostic variables assessing subjective perceptions of remote work’s impact on productivity, autonomy, communication, and work-life balance (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). The sample consisted of 100 respondents and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and measures of variation. Findings: Preliminary results suggest that remote work is associated with enhanced concentration, greater autonomy, improved task prioritization, and higher motivation. Respondents reported better time management and work-life integration, though some challenges—such as social isolation or ineffective communication—were also noted. Hybrid work emerged as a preferred model that optimally balances productivity and employee well-being. Practical Implications: The findings offer valuable insights for organizations designing post-pandemic work strategies. Emphasis should be placed on flexible structures, digital support, and the development of soft competencies such as time management and self-regulation. Originality/Value: This article contributes to the ongoing discourse on the future of work by empirically grounding discussions of remote productivity and well-being. By integrating behavioral and organizational perspectives, it highlights the dual impact of remote work on performance and personal balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Kalinowska & Elzbieta Noworol-Luft, 2025. "Remote Work and Work Efficiency," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 420-431.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:420-431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/4051/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & James Liang & John Roberts & Zhichun Jenny Ying, 2015. "Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(1), pages 165-218.
    2. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:139-151 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Radziukiewicz, Małgorzata, . "Remote work in Poland and its perspectives," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 14(4).
    4. Katarzyna Kalinowska & Lukasz Wojtowicz & Elzbieta Noworol-Luft, 2025. "Work-Life Balance Challenges of Young Startup Entrepreneurs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 441-450.
    5. Joanna Duda & Anna Wolak-Tuzimek & Lukasz Wojtowicz, 2021. "Competition Instruments Applied by Large Enterprises during the Crisis Triggered by the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 139-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simisola Johnson, 2022. "Women deserve better: A discussion on COVID‐19 and the gendered organization in the new economy," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 639-649, March.
    2. Alfred Michael Dockery & Sherry Bawa, 2014. "Is working from home good or bad work? Evidence from Australian employees," Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre Working Paper series WP1402, Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School.
    3. Claudia Hupkau & Barbara Petrongolo, 2020. "Work, Care and Gender during the COVID‐19 Crisis," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 623-651, September.
    4. Guido Friebel & Matthias Heinz & Miriam Krueger & Nikolay Zubanov, 2017. "Team Incentives and Performance: Evidence from a Retail Chain," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(8), pages 2168-2203, August.
    5. Ro’i Zultan & Eldar Dadon, 2023. "Missing the forest for the trees: when monitoring quantitative measures distorts task prioritization," Working Papers 2319, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    6. Barbora Mazúrová & Ján Kollár & Gabriela Nedelová, 2021. "Travel Mode of Commuting in Context of Subjective Well-Being—Experience from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Octavio M. Aguilar, 2025. "Work from Home and the Productivity Gains from Rising Disability Employment," Working Paper series 25-04, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    8. Kouki, Amairisa, 2023. "Beyond the “Comforts” of work from home: Child health and the female wage penalty," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Stefano Magrini & Alessandro Spiganti, 2021. "The Day After Covid-19: Implications for Growth, Specialization, and Inequality," Working Papers 2021:13, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    10. Tim Klopries, 2018. "Discussion of “Working from Home—What is the Effect on Employees’ Effort?”," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 70(1), pages 57-62, February.
    11. Harkiolakis, Tatiana & Komodromos, Marcos, 2023. "Supporting knowledge workers’ health and well-being in the post-lockdown era," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118409, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Mayneris, Florian & Poncet, Sandra & Zhang, Tao, 2018. "Improving or disappearing: Firm-level adjustments to minimum wages in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 20-42.
    13. Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Tim Weitzel, 2022. "A Dark Side of Telework: A Social Comparison-Based Study from the Perspective of Office Workers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 793-811, December.
    14. Alessandra Fenizia & Tom Kirchmaier, 2024. "Not incentivized yet efficient: Working from home in the public sector," CEP Discussion Papers dp2036, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    15. Heinz, Matthias & Jeworrek, Sabrina & Mertins, Vanessa & Schumacher, Heiner & Sutter, Matthias, 2017. "Measuring Indirect Effects of Unfair Employer Behavior on Worker Productivity: A Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 11128, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Elstner, Steffen & Grimme, Christian & Kecht, Valentin & Lehmann, Robert, 2022. "The diffusion of technological progress in ICT," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Vij, Akshay & Souza, Flavio F. & Barrie, Helen & Anilan, V. & Sarmiento, Sergio & Washington, Lynette, 2023. "Employee preferences for working from home in Australia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 782-800.
    18. Sujin Park & Ali Tafti & Galit Shmueli, 2024. "Transporting Causal Effects Across Populations Using Structural Causal Modeling: An Illustration to Work-from-Home Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 686-705, June.
    19. Markus Nagler & Johannes Rincke & Erwin Winkler, 2024. "Working from home, commuting, and gender," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(3), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Ourania Tzoraki & Svetlana Dimitrova & Marin Barzakov & Saad Yaseen & Vasilis Gavalas & Hani Harb & Abas Haidari & Brian P. Cahill & Alexandra Ćulibrk & Ekaterini Nikolarea & Eleni Andrianopulu & Miro, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Working Conditions, Employment, Career Development and Well-Being of Refugee Researchers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:420-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.