IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijfirm/v9y2019i1-2p21-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Valuation Models Applicable in a Small Stock Market: A Maltese Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Konrad Farrugia
  • Kyle Bonello
  • Peter J. Baldacchino

Abstract

Purpose: This paper analyses the applicability of three main Corporate Valuation Models (CVMs) to Maltese listed companies by assessing the extent to which such models - the Income, Relative, and Asset-Based ones - produce accurate results in terms of quoted share prices. Furthermore, it examines whether factors such as accounting regulations, market efficiency and other factors in a small island-state such as merger and acquisition activities may be impacting corporate valuation, including the method chosen. Design/Methodology/Approach: A multi-method explanatory strategy is adopted involving (i) the calculation and quantitative analysis of the theoretical equity values of eight listed property companies according to each method, this being followed qualitatively by (ii) nine semi-structured interviews with Big Four representatives, Chief Financial Officers and financial analysts. Findings: Results indicate that, while the Income Model was most widely used by respondents, it had the weakest correlation with share prices, respondents also attributing this to the adverse impact from market inefficiency on the share price within the small stock market. Contrastingly, the Relative Model, investigated by the use of a Generalised Linear Model, yielded the strongest relationship with share prices. Practical Implications: Respondents did not consider this method its own being superior to other methods but suggested that it is to be used in congruence with the Asset-Based Model which also had a not-so-strong correlation with share prices. Respondents perceived accounting regulations as enhancing trust and accountability during the valuation process although no quantitative evidence emerged that this factor or others such as merger activities had any direct correlation with share prices. Originality/Value: The study concludes that there was no single dominant valuation model for the selected listed companies. It also questions the applicability of such CVMs in a small island-state, and indicates that a small stock market with its illiquidity and inefficiency can be easily affecting share price values, this evidently being a main contributor to the larger-than-expected variations of market pricing with the theoretical value calculated through any CVM.

Suggested Citation

  • Konrad Farrugia & Kyle Bonello & Peter J. Baldacchino, 2019. "Corporate Valuation Models Applicable in a Small Stock Market: A Maltese Perspective," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 9(1-2), pages 21-47.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:9:y:2019:i:1-2:p:21-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalfirm.com/journal/188/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Mongrut & Dídac Ramírez, 2006. "Discount Rates in Emerging Capital Markets," Working Papers 06-03, Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico.
    2. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    3. Mattias Hamberg & Mari Paananen & Jiri Novak, 2011. "The Adoption of IFRS 3: The Effects of Managerial Discretion and Stock Market Reactions," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 263-288.
    4. Martin Glaum & Peter Schmidt & Donna L. Street & Silvia Vogel, 2013. "Compliance with IFRS 3- and IAS 36-required disclosures across 17 European countries: company- and country-level determinants," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 163-204, June.
    5. Emanuele Rossi & Gianfranco Forte, 2016. "Assessing Relative Valuation in Equity Markets," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-56335-4.
    6. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    7. Joseph Aharony & Ran Barniv & Haim Falk, 2010. "The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Equity Valuation of Accounting Numbers for Security Investors in the EU," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 535-578.
    8. Steven Cahan & Niclas Hellman & Patric Andersson & Emelie Fröberg & Steven Cahan, 2016. "The impact of IFRS goodwill reporting on financial analysts' equity valuation judgements: some experimental evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(1), pages 113-157, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. d'Arcy, Anne & Tarca, Ann, 2018. "Reviewing IFRS Goodwill Accounting Research: Implementation Effects and Cross-Country Differences," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 203-226.
    2. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Dimitrios G. Konstantinides & Georgios C. Zachos, 2019. "Exhibiting Abnormal Returns Under a Risk Averse Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 551-566, June.
    4. Ladislav Kristoufek & Paulo Ferreira, 2018. "Capital asset pricing model in Portugal: Evidence from fractal regressions," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 17(3), pages 173-183, November.
    5. Klaus Schredelseker, 2012. "Finanzkrise — Mitschuld der Theorie?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(8), pages 833-845, December.
    6. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    7. Xuan Vinh Vo & Kevin Daly, 2008. "Volatility amongst firms in the Dow Jones Eurostoxx50 Index," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 569-582.
    8. Kentaro Imajo & Kentaro Minami & Katsuya Ito & Kei Nakagawa, 2020. "Deep Portfolio Optimization via Distributional Prediction of Residual Factors," Papers 2012.07245, arXiv.org.
    9. Leila Hedhili Zaier & Khaled Mokni & Ahdi Noomen Ajmi, 2024. "Causality relationships between climate policy uncertainty, renewable energy stocks, and oil prices: a mixed-frequency causality analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Carmen López-Martín & Sonia Benito Muela & Raquel Arguedas, 2021. "Efficiency in cryptocurrency markets: new evidence," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 403-431, September.
    11. Zbyněk Revenda, 2016. "Investment in Precious Metals and Stocks [Investice do drahých kovů a akcií]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(4), pages 24-36.
    12. Narcyz Roztocki & Heinz Roland Weistroffer, 2015. "Investments in enterprise integration technology: An event study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 659-672, June.
    13. repec:ehu:cuader:7431 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Botor, Benjamin & Böcker, Benjamin & Kallabis, Thomas & Weber, Christoph, 2021. "Information shocks and profitability risks for power plant investments – impacts of policy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Boudt, Kris & Raza, Muhammad Wajid & Wauters, Marjan, 2019. "Evaluating the Shariah-compliance of equity portfolios: The weighting method matters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 406-417.
    16. Attiya Yasmeen Javid, 2000. "Alternative Capital Asset Pricing Models: A Review of Theory and Evidence," PIDE Research Report 2000:3, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    17. Li, Da-Ye & Nishimura, Yusaku & Men, Ming, 2014. "Fractal markets: Liquidity and investors on different time horizons," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 144-151.
    18. Lu Zhang, 2019. "Q-factors and Investment CAPM," NBER Working Papers 26538, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Chhabra, Damini & Gupta, Mohit, 2022. "Calendar anomalies in commodity markets for natural resources: Evidence from India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Paul Handro & Bogdan Dima, 2024. "Analyzing Financial Markets Efficiency: Insights from a Bibliometric and Content Review," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 16(9), pages 119-175, May.
    21. Peter Praetz & Michael Naphtali & John Nolan, 1975. "A Test of the Efficient Market Theory Using Filter Tests on Stock Prices," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 51(1), pages 66-72, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Valuation Models; Income Model; Relative Model; Asset-Based Model.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:9:y:2019:i:1-2:p:21-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalfirm.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.