IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiy2019i4p149-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Net Benefit of Google Drive Adoption Decision: A Case Study of Thais’ Living in Bangkok, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Rawin Vongurai

Abstract

Purpose: The research proceeded to investigate the factors affecting net benefit of google drive adoption decision among Thais living in Bangkok, Thailand. Design/Methodology/Approach: The data were collected from 412 respondents through convenient sampling technique by online questionnaire. Information quality, system quality, service quality, user satisfaction, intention to use and net benefit, validity and reliability of each variables were examined by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Model (SEM). Findings: The results showed that user satisfaction has the most direct effect on net benefit. Moreover, information quality, system quality and service quality were indirectly affected on net benefit of google drive. Therefore, google drive serve quality system that matches with customer satisfaction and expectation to improve job efficiency. Practical Implications: Although previous studies have identified on the use of google drive in collaborative business operations. However, the factors behind the use of google drive cloud system and the decisions behind the adaptation would provide useful insights for better understanding of the mechanism. Originality/Value: This research provides advanced recommendations to those who concern on the use of efficient google drive features not only to develop its features, but also to strengthen the smooth and flexible work patterns in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rawin Vongurai, 2019. "Factors Affecting Net Benefit of Google Drive Adoption Decision: A Case Study of Thais’ Living in Bangkok, Thailand," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 149-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:vii:y:2019:i:4:p:149-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijeba.com/journal/337/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brodie, Roderick J. & Whittome, James R.M. & Brush, Gregory J., 2009. "Investigating the service brand: A customer value perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 345-355, March.
    2. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    3. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    4. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    2. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    3. Lee, Sang-Yong Tom & Kim, Hee-Woong & Gupta, Sumeet, 2009. "Measuring open source software success," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 426-438, April.
    4. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2015. "Exploring the intention to continue using web-based self-service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 85-93.
    5. Yi-Shun Wang & Shin-jeng Lin & Ci-Rong Li & Timmy H. Tseng & Hsien-Ta Li & Jia-Yang Lee, 2018. "Developing and validating a physical product e-tailing systems success model," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 245-257, December.
    6. Dongping Liu & Hai Zhang, 2021. "Developing a New Model for Understanding Teacher Satisfaction With Online Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    7. Brown, Susan A. & Venkatesh, Viswanath & Kuruzovich, Jason & Massey, Anne P., 2008. "Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 52-66, January.
    8. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    9. Ageeva, Elena & Melewar, T.C. & Foroudi, Pantea & Dennis, Charles & Jin, Zhongqi, 2018. "Examining the influence of corporate website favorability on corporate image and corporate reputation: Findings from fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 287-304.
    10. García, Juan A. & Gómez, Mar & Molina, Arturo, 2012. "A destination-branding model: An empirical analysis based on stakeholders," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 646-661.
    11. Chiu, Candy Lim & Ho, Han-Chiang & Yu, Tiancheng & Liu, Yijun & Mo, Yuwen, 2021. "Exploring information technology success of Augmented Reality Retail Applications in retail food chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Zhen Wang & John Lim & Xiaojia Guo, 2010. "Negotiator Satisfaction in NSS-Facilitated Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 279-300, May.
    13. Song, Jaeki & Baker, Jeff & Lee, Sangno & Wetherbe, James C., 2012. "Examining online consumers’ behavior: A service-oriented view," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 221-231.
    14. Smith, Carlo D. & Mentzer, John T., 2010. "Forecasting task-technology fit: The influence of individuals, systems and procedures on forecast performance," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 144-161, January.
    15. Zhen Shao & Lin Zhang & Tian Meng & Jing Zhang, 2024. "The paradox of technology quality and ethical concerns in building trust and behavioral intention in the AI-enabled face recognition payment," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Lin Li & Kyung Young Lee & Emmanuel Emokpae & Sung-Byung Yang, 2021. "What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from chinese online travel agencies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 575-599, September.
    17. Xiang Fang & Clyde W. Holsapple, 2011. "Impacts of navigation structure, task complexity, and users’ domain knowledge on Web site usability—an empirical study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 453-469, September.
    18. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    19. Hadziroh Ibrahim & Nur Zahiyah Othman, 2014. "The Influence of Techno stress and Organizational-Is Related Support on User Satisfaction in Government Organizations: A Proposed Model and Literature Review," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 63-71.
    20. Busalim, Abdelsalam H. & Ghabban, Fahad & Hussin, Ab Razak Che, 2021. "Customer engagement behaviour on social commerce platforms: An empirical study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:vii:y:2019:i:4:p:149-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.