IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/energy/v4y2024i2id7135.html

Characterization of Corn Stover and Eucalyptus Sawdust for Pellet Production

Author

Listed:
  • Lazarus Kiprop Limo
  • Diana Starovoytova Madara
  • Jerry Ochola

Abstract

Reducing the use of fossil fuels and increasing the use of renewable resources is essential in minimizing climate change. As the world progress towards using more renewable resources for energy and other products, biomasses will be crucial to this transition. Utilizing biomass as efficiently as possible is therefore necessary, and this relies on the types of biomasses used in addition to the actual production methods. Biomass residues like corn stover and eucalyptus sawdust could be valuable sources of renewable energy. Corn stovers are herbaceous agricultural residue, whereas eucalyptus sawdust is a woody residue that can be processed into different fuels that have a variety of applications. Pelleting is the cheapest technique for producing fuel pellets that can be employed for heat and electricity production. The overall qualities of pellets can be enhanced by blending biomass materials with different qualities and using additives, such as binders. Corn stovers and eucalyptus sawdust are large waste streams which are more often discarded and underutilized. To ascertain the suitability of these biomass residues as blends on pelletization, determination of their properties through characterization is, therefore, a necessity. The focus of this research was to determine the analysis of both their ultimate and proximate composition of eucalyptus sawdust and corn stover and the higher heating values. These properties were determined using ASTM standards. The results obtained for proximate analysis of corn stover were moisture content, volatile matter, ash content, and fixed carbon were 5.92%, 74.99%, 5.21%, and 20.13%, respectively, and 3.70%, 84.66%, 3.22%, and 12.11% respectively for eucalyptus sawdust. Corn stovers’ ultimate analysis for carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen were 39.54%, 5.70%, 1.38%, 0.07%, and 53.32%, respectively, and 47.16%, 4.97%, 0.08%, 0.03%, and 47.76%, respectively for eucalyptus sawdust. Higher heating values were 17.38 MJ/kg and 17.93 MJ/kg for corn stover and eucalyptus sawdust, respectively. These results indicate that corn stover and eucalyptus sawdust can be blended together, improving the properties of corn stover pellets, such as higher heating value and reduction of ash content.

Suggested Citation

  • Lazarus Kiprop Limo & Diana Starovoytova Madara & Jerry Ochola, 2024. "Characterization of Corn Stover and Eucalyptus Sawdust for Pellet Production," European Journal of Energy Research, European Open Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-5, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:4:y:2024:i:2:id:7135
    DOI: 10.24018/ejenergy.2024.4.2.135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/view/7135
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/download/7135/1091
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejenergy.2024.4.2.135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianbiao Liu & Xuya Jiang & Yanhao Yuan & Huanhuan Chen & Wenbin Zhang & Hongzhen Cai & Feng Gao, 2022. "Densification of Yak Manure Biofuel Pellets and Evaluation of Parameters: Effects on Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Antonio Pantaleo & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Francesco Santoro & Sara Rajabi Hamedani, 2020. "Techno-Economic Modeling of Biomass Pellet Routes: Feasibility in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    3. He, Chao & Tang, Chunyan & Li, Chuanhao & Yuan, Jihui & Tran, Khanh-Quang & Bach, Quang-Vu & Qiu, Rongliang & Yang, Yanhui, 2018. "Wet torrefaction of biomass for high quality solid fuel production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 259-271.
    4. Rodolfo Picchio & Francesco Latterini & Rachele Venanzi & Walter Stefanoni & Alessandro Suardi & Damiano Tocci & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Pellet Production from Woody and Non-Woody Feedstocks: A Review on Biomass Quality Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Alizadeh, Reza & Lund, Peter D. & Soltanisehat, Leili, 2020. "Outlook on biofuels in future studies: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Colantoni & Rodolfo Picchio & Alvaro Marucci & Elena Di Mattia & Valerio Cristofori & Fabio Recanatesi & Mauro Villarini & Danilo Monarca & Massimo Cecchini, 2020. "WP3—Innovation in Agriculture and Forestry Sector for Energetic Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Stachowicz, Paweł & Stolarski, Mariusz J., 2024. "Pellets from mixtures of short rotation coppice with forest-derived biomass: Production costs and energy intensity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Bonaiuto, M. & Mosca, O. & Milani, A. & Ariccio, S. & Dessi, F. & Fornara, F., 2024. "Beliefs about technological and contextual features drive biofuels’ social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. Yao, Zhongliang & Ma, Xiaoqian & Xiao, Zhiyuan, 2020. "The effect of two pretreatment levels on the pyrolysis characteristics of water hyacinth," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 514-527.
    5. Kumar, R. & Strezov, V., 2021. "Thermochemical production of bio-oil: A review of downstream processing technologies for bio-oil upgrading, production of hydrogen and high value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Ali M. H. A. Khajah & Simon P. Philbin, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis and Modelling of the Feasibility of Wind Energy in Kuwait," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Pritpal Singh & Gurdeep Singh & G. P. S. Sodhi, 2022. "Data envelopment analysis based optimization for improving net ecosystem carbon and energy budget in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivation: methods and a case study of north-western India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2079-2119, February.
    8. Onu Onu Olughu & Lope G. Tabil & Tim Dumonceaux & Edmund Mupondwa & Duncan Cree, 2021. "Comparative Study on Quality of Fuel Pellets from Switchgrass Treated with Different White-Rot Fungi," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Kostyniuk, Andrii & Likozar, Blaž, 2024. "Wet torrefaction of biomass waste into high quality hydrochar and value-added liquid products using different zeolite catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Artur Przywara & Francesco Santoro & Artur Kraszkiewicz & Anna Pecyna & Simone Pascuzzi, 2020. "Experimental Study of Disc Fertilizer Spreader Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    11. Paweł Stachowicz & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2022. "Thermophysical Properties and Elemental Composition of Black Locust, Poplar and Willow Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Olba-Zięty, Ewelina, 2024. "Energy efficiency of Silphium perfoliatum and Helianthus salicifolius biomass production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    13. Lyes Bennamoun & Merlin Simo-Tagne & Macmanus Chinenye Ndukwu, 2020. "Simulation of Storage Conditions of Mixed Biomass Pellets for Bioenergy Generation: Study of the Thermodynamic Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    14. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Justyna Żywiołek & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Maciej Mrowiec, 2021. "Knowledge Management in Households about Energy Saving as Part of the Awareness of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Menelio Bardales & Catherine Bukowski & Valentín Molina-Moreno & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Ángel Fermín Ramos-Ridao, 2022. "A Tool for the Assessment of Forest Biomass as a Source of Rural Sustainable Energy in Natural Areas in Honduras," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Isabel Brás & Massimiliano Fabbricino & José Ferreira & Elisabete Silva & Vincenzo Mignano, 2025. "Sustainable Heat Production for Fossil Fuel Replacement—Life Cycle Assessment for Plant Biomass Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Briongos, J.V. & Taramona, S. & Gómez-Hernández, J. & Mulone, V. & Santana, D., 2021. "Solar and biomass hybridization through hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 268-279.
    19. Lin, Yi-Li & Zheng, Nai-Yun & Lin, Ching-Shi, 2021. "Repurposing Washingtonia filifera petiole and Sterculia foetida follicle waste biomass for renewable energy through torrefaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    20. Magdalena Dołżyńska & Sławomir Obidziński & Jolanta Piekut & Güray Yildiz, 2020. "The Utilization of Plum Stones for Pellet Production and Investigation of Post-Combustion Flue Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:4:y:2024:i:2:id:7135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.