IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/energy/v2y2022i2id7043.html

Comparison of the Efficiency of Polycrystalline and Thin-Film Photovoltaic Outdoors

Author

Listed:
  • M. Almadhhachi

    (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary)

  • I. Seres

    (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary)

  • I. Farkas

    (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary)

Abstract

In this paper, a comparison was made between two types of PV modules widely used in the market: polycrystalline and thin-film (both of them are silicon-based manufacturing) to identify the variables and parameters affecting the efficiency of solar cells. The efficiency of polycrystalline is higher than thin-film, although the open circuit voltage is more affected by solar radiation. The comparison was made in Gödöllő in Hungary, characterized by a moderate climate temperature and humidity on a partly cloudy day to study the effect of clouds and the change in the amount of solar radiation on solar cells. The flexible feature of thin-film cells can be used in many applications, especially those related to covering surfaces, as it is considered thin-layer and does not require an expensive metal structure to install. All these variables were calculated and discussed. The difference between the efficiency of polycrystalline and thin-film modules was a small percentage ranging between (-0.2% to 0.5%). This difference comes from the manufacturing technology method and the manufacturing quality itself.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:2:y:2022:i:2:id:7043
DOI: 10.24018/ejenergy.2022.2.2.43
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/view/7043
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/download/7043/1020
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejenergy.2022.2.2.43?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:2:y:2022:i:2:id:7043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.