IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/energy/v2y2022i2id7043.html

Comparison of the Efficiency of Polycrystalline and Thin-Film Photovoltaic Outdoors

Author

Listed:
  • M. Almadhhachi
  • I. Seres
  • I. Farkas

Abstract

In this paper, a comparison was made between two types of PV modules widely used in the market: polycrystalline and thin-film (both of them are silicon-based manufacturing) to identify the variables and parameters affecting the efficiency of solar cells. The efficiency of polycrystalline is higher than thin-film, although the open circuit voltage is more affected by solar radiation. The comparison was made in Gödöllő in Hungary, characterized by a moderate climate temperature and humidity on a partly cloudy day to study the effect of clouds and the change in the amount of solar radiation on solar cells. The flexible feature of thin-film cells can be used in many applications, especially those related to covering surfaces, as it is considered thin-layer and does not require an expensive metal structure to install. All these variables were calculated and discussed. The difference between the efficiency of polycrystalline and thin-film modules was a small percentage ranging between (-0.2% to 0.5%). This difference comes from the manufacturing technology method and the manufacturing quality itself.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Almadhhachi & I. Seres & I. Farkas, 2022. "Comparison of the Efficiency of Polycrystalline and Thin-Film Photovoltaic Outdoors," European Journal of Energy Research, European Open Science, vol. 2(2), pages 9-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:2:y:2022:i:2:id:7043
    DOI: 10.24018/ejenergy.2022.2.2.43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/view/7043
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/download/7043/1020
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejenergy.2022.2.2.43?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad, Salman & Tahar, Razman Mat, 2014. "Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 458-466.
    2. Lee, Taesoo D. & Ebong, Abasifreke U., 2017. "A review of thin film solar cell technologies and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1286-1297.
    3. Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Shauhrat S. Chopra & Maria Malvoni & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Narottam Das, 2020. "Solar Cell Technology Selection for a PV Leaf Based on Energy and Sustainability Indicators—A Case of a Multilayered Solar Photovoltaic Tree," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Cañete, Cristina & Carretero, Jesús & Sidrach-de-Cardona, Mariano, 2014. "Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 295-302.
    5. Erdem Cuce & Tulin Bali & Suphi Anil Sekucoglu, 2011. "Effects of passive cooling on performance of silicon photovoltaic cells," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 299-308, July.
    6. Kesler, Selami & Kivrak, Sinan & Dincer, Furkan & Rustemli, Sabir & Karaaslan, Muharrem & Unal, Emin & Erdiven, Utku, 2014. "The analysis of PV power potential and system installation in Manavgat, Turkey—A case study in winter season," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 671-680.
    7. Fuentes, M. & Vivar, M. & de la Casa, J. & Aguilera, J., 2018. "An experimental comparison between commercial hybrid PV-T and simple PV systems intended for BIPV," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 110-120.
    8. Ahssan M. A. Alshibil & Piroska Víg & István Farkas, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Solar Collector in Two Different Climates," European Journal of Energy Research, European Open Science, vol. 1(2), pages 17-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yilmaz, Saban & Ozcalik, Hasan Riza & Kesler, Selami & Dincer, Furkan & Yelmen, Bekir, 2015. "The analysis of different PV power systems for the determination of optimal PV panels and system installation—A case study in Kahramanmaras, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1015-1024.
    2. Reza Khalifeeh & Hameed Alrashidi & Nazmi Sellami & Tapas Mallick & Walid Issa, 2021. "State-of-the-Art Review on the Energy Performance of Semi-Transparent Building Integrated Photovoltaic across a Range of Different Climatic and Environmental Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    4. Tang, Shengwen & Chen, Jingtao & Sun, Peigui & Li, Yang & Yu, Peng & Chen, E., 2019. "Current and future hydropower development in Southeast Asia countries (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Myanmar)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 239-249.
    5. Aziz, Md Tareq & Haque, Akramul & Islam, Md Rabiul & Hosen, Md Biplob & Kader, Zarjes & Aziz, Md Abdul & Saha, Ovi Ranjan, 2025. "Site suitability assessment for solar powered green hydrogen production plants: A GIS based AHP and Fuzzy AHP approach for Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    6. Andrew Chapman & Timothy Fraser & Melanie Dennis, 2019. "Investigating Ties between Energy Policy and Social Equity Research: A Citation Network Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    8. Najafi, Fatemeh & Kazemi, Mostafa & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Mishra, Phoolenrda, 2025. "Prioritizing industrial wastes and technologies for bioenergy production: Case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Mohamed Ali Elleuch & Marwa Mallek & Ahmed Frikha & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid & Murad Andejany, 2021. "Solving a Multiple User Energy Source Selection Problem Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Wang, Yacheng & Xia, Guodong & Zhou, Wenbin & Zhao, Shuai & Zhao, Pengsheng, 2024. "Exergetic and environment assessment of linear fresnel concentrating photovoltaic systems integrated with a porous-wall mini-channel heat sink: Outdoor experimental tests," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    11. Muhammad Riaz & Wojciech Sałabun & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Nawazish Ali & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2020. "A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, May.
    12. Al-Amri, Fahad & Saeed, Farooq & Mujeebu, Muhammad Abdul, 2022. "Novel dual-function racking structure for passive cooling of solar PV panels –thermal performance analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 100-113.
    13. Khalifa Mohammed Al-Sobai & Shaligram Pokharel & Galal M. Abdella, 2020. "Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    14. repec:eco:journ2:2017-04-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    16. Freier, Daria & Ramirez-Iniguez, Roberto & Jafry, Tahseen & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus & Gamio, Carlos, 2018. "A review of optical concentrators for portable solar photovoltaic systems for developing countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 957-968.
    17. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    18. Gorjian, Shiva & Bousi, Erion & Özdemir, Özal Emre & Trommsdorff, Max & Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj & Anand, Abhishek & Kant, Karunesh & Chopra, Shauhrat S., 2022. "Progress and challenges of crop production and electricity generation in agrivoltaic systems using semi-transparent photovoltaic technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Haddad, Brahim & Liazid, Abdelkrim & Ferreira, Paula, 2017. "A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 462-472.
    20. Sargunanathan, S. & Elango, A. & Mohideen, S. Tharves, 2016. "Performance enhancement of solar photovoltaic cells using effective cooling methods: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 382-393.
    21. Xu, Sai & Tao, Kejun & He, Wei & Mao, Ding & Li, Kaijie & Hu, Zhongting & Yuan, Chenglong, 2025. "Performance analysis and structural optimization of a breathable CIGS double-layer PV window via passive regulation by bimetallic strips," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:2:y:2022:i:2:id:7043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.