IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/develo/v4y2024i5id15388.html

Influence of Participatory Negotiation on Performance of HIV/AIDS Community Health Projects in Kisumu County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Odawa Ojall
  • Charles M. Rambo
  • Lillian Otieno-Omutoko
  • Salome W. Richu

Abstract

The United Nations has noted with concern that around 38.5 million across the globe live with HIV/AIDS. Globally, HIV/AIDS community health projects have been implemented and has influenced significantly the health sector with government and NGOs working together to shape agendas related to health. Therefore, there are efforts to combat HIV/AIDS internationally through Sustainable Development Goal and intensification of efforts to reinvigorate the global community. Based on the foregoing, the study examined how Participatory negotiation influences performance of HIV/AIDS community health projects implemented by Non-Governmental Organizations in Kisumu County, Kenya. This study was grounded on stakeholder’s theory as well as theory of change because the HIV/AIDS community health projects in Kenya is a results-oriented. The research design was descriptive cross-sectional survey which allows the use of both qualitative and quantitative methodologies of gathering data. The target population for this study will be a total of 30,118 comprising 59 monitoring and evaluation officers, 59 project managers and 30,000 beneficiaries of the HIV/AIDS community projects in Kisumu County. The study will purposively select 59 HIV/AIDS project managers and 59 Monitoring and evaluation officers. Using Krejcie and Morgan (1970) formula, the study used a sample size of 379 beneficiaries selected through simple random sampling technique. The study used structured questionnaire to collect quantitative data. Quantitative data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics of frequencies, percentages, mean score and standard deviation with results tabulated and presented on tables and graphs, as well as inferential statistics of Pearson correlation analysis and regression analysis. The simple linear regression coefficients as well as the Pearson correlation results indicated that there was significant effect of Participatory negotiations on Performance of HIV/AIDs Community Health Projects. The small p-values; implied that there was a significant effect of Participatory negotiations on Performance of HIV/AIDs Community Health Projects. The project managers and M&E officers should design appropriate implementation strategies for the health projects that will enable Participatory negotiation practices to be properly implemented in order to enhance performance of community HIV/AIDS health projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Odawa Ojall & Charles M. Rambo & Lillian Otieno-Omutoko & Salome W. Richu, 2024. "Influence of Participatory Negotiation on Performance of HIV/AIDS Community Health Projects in Kisumu County, Kenya," European Journal of Development Studies, European Open Science, vol. 4(5), pages 6-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:4:y:2024:i:5:id:15388
    DOI: 10.24018/ejdevelop.2024.4.5.388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/view/15388
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/download/15388/3634
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejdevelop.2024.4.5.388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhonda C. Holliday & Romell Phillips & Tabia Henry Akintobi, 2020. "A Community-Based Participatory Approach to the Development and Implementation of an HIV Health Behavior Intervention: Lessons Learned in Navigating Research and Practice Systems from Project HAPPY," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Nicholas Obudho Simon & Mary Nyawira Mwenda, 2021. "Influence of Stakeholders’ Participation in Monitoring and Evaluation Process on Implementation of HIV & AIDS Projects in Kenya: A Case of Dreams Project in Nairobi County," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 6(1), pages 32-37, January.
    3. Sven Wunder & Jan Börner & Driss Ezzine-de-Blas & Sarah Feder & Stefano Pagiola, 2020. "Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 209-234, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kangas, Johanna & Ollikainen, Markku, 2022. "A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Canessa, Carolin & Venus, Terese E. & Wiesmeier, Miriam & Mennig, Philipp & Sauer, Johannes, 2023. "Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Sergei Schaub & Tobias Roth & Petyo Bonev, 2025. "The effect of result‐based agri‐environmental payments on biodiversity: Evidence from Switzerland," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(4), pages 1228-1254, August.
    4. Robalino, Juan & Pfaff, Alexander & Sandoval, Catalina & Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. Arturo, 2021. "Can we increase the impacts from payments for ecosystem services? Impact rose over time in Costa Rica, yet spatial variation indicates more potential," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Alain‐Désiré Nimubona & Jean‐Christophe Pereau, 2022. "Negotiating over payments for wetland ecosystem services," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 1507-1538, August.
    6. Kim, Youngho & Lichtenberg, Erik & Newburn, David A., 2024. "Payments and penalties in ecosystem services programs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Carrilho, Cauê D. & Demarchi, Gabriela & Duchelle, Amy E. & Wunder, Sven & Morsello, Carla, 2022. "Permanence of avoided deforestation in a Transamazon REDD+ project (Pará, Brazil)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Garrett, R.D. & Grabs, J. & Cammelli, F. & Gollnow, F. & Levy, S.A., 2022. "Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Wunder, Sven & Fraccaroli, Cecilia & Varela, Elsa & Bruzzese, Stefano & Termansen, Mette, 2025. "Examining innovative designs of agri-environmental schemes in Europe: A case comparison of impact pathways," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Toba Stephen Olasehinde & Zhongan Wu & Siyu Yue & Fangbin Qiao & Yubing Fan, 2026. "Does Payment for Ecosystem Services Improve Technical Efficiency of Forage Production? Evidence From China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(1), January.
    11. Vorlaufer, Tobias & Steimanis, Ivo & Plassenberg, Jan, 2025. "Payment for ecosystem services and crowding of conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of lab-in-the-field experiments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Kym Anderson, 2021. "Food policy in a more volatile climate and trade environment," Departmental Working Papers 2021-25, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    13. Botao Qin & Jason F Shogren & Thorsten Janus, 2025. "The effects of social norm sensitivity in a PES mechanism," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 45(2), pages 792-800.
    14. Hönow, Nils Christian & Bensch, Gunther & Kirk, Michael, 2026. "Introducing and terminating monetary incentives in non-regenerating forests: Insights from a framed field experiment," Ruhr Economic Papers 1209, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Nils Christian Hoenow & Gunther Bensch & Michael Kirk, 2026. "Introducing and Terminating Monetary Incentives in Non-Regenerating Forests: Insights from a Framed Field Experiment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 89(6), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Bhatta, Manoj & Garnett, Stephen T. & Zander, Kerstin K., 2022. "Exploring options for a PES-like scheme to conserve red panda habitat and livelihood improvement in western Nepal," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Naime, Julia & Angelsen, Arild & Rodriguez-Ward, Dawn & Sills, Erin O., 2024. "Participation, anticipation effects and impact perceptions of two collective incentive-based conservation interventions in Ucayali, Peru," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Sven Wunder & Cecilia Fraccaroli & Joseph W. Bull & Trishna Dutta & Alison Eyres & Megan C. Evans & Bo Jellesmark Thorsen & Julia P. G. Jones & Martine Maron & Bart Muys & Andrea Pacheco & Asger Stran, 2025. "Biodiversity Credits: An Overview of the Current State, Future Opportunities, and Potential Pitfalls," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8470-8499, November.
    19. P. Bucher, Isabela & N. L. Seixas, Renato, 2026. "Do payments for environmental services impact forest cover? An evaluation of the reflorestar program," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    20. Bingham, Logan Robert, 2021. "Vittel as a model case in PES discourse: Review and critical perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:4:y:2024:i:5:id:15388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.