IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v57y2026i1ne70084.html

Does Payment for Ecosystem Services Improve Technical Efficiency of Forage Production? Evidence From China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Toba Stephen Olasehinde
  • Zhongan Wu
  • Siyu Yue
  • Fangbin Qiao
  • Yubing Fan

Abstract

China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) is the world's most extensive grassland conservation program, based on a payment‐ for‐ ecosystem‐ services framework. Despite comprehensive studies on its impact, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Using survey data collected from 1039 forage farmers in Gansu and Qinghai provinces in China, this study employs a propensity score matching approach to address selection bias from observable factors. A selectivity‐corrected stochastic production frontier model was subsequently applied to correct for the bias due to unobservable characteristics. We find that GECP increased technical efficiency by more than 5.7%. Moreover, the unconditional quantile regression results demonstrate that farmers with higher TE quantiles benefit more from GECP than farmers with lower TE quantiles.

Suggested Citation

  • Toba Stephen Olasehinde & Zhongan Wu & Siyu Yue & Fangbin Qiao & Yubing Fan, 2026. "Does Payment for Ecosystem Services Improve Technical Efficiency of Forage Production? Evidence From China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70084
    DOI: 10.1111/agec.70084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70084
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/agec.70084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.