IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v98y2020icp21-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply-side network effects on mobile-source emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Shah, Rohan
  • Nezamuddin, N.
  • Levin, Michael W.

Abstract

Mobile-source emissions are pivotal in quantifying the negative externalities of surface transportation, such as environmental pollution and climate-change, and in evaluating low-carbon traffic strategies. In such assessments, it is important to avoid prospective policy shortcomings. Hence, a wide range of sensitivities of mobile-source emissions must be understood, particularly from a traffic modeling standpoint. This paper takes a step in that direction and explores the effects of certain supply-side network attributes on emissions. Three key elements are investigated: level-of-detail of traffic activity, link speeds in the network, and link lengths. Both aggregated (hourly) and fine-grained (per-second) traffic activities are modeled using a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment tool. Emissions are modeled using US Environmental Protection Agency's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES). System-wide estimates of five criteria pollutants (CO, NO2, PM10, PM2.5, and SO2) and greenhouse-gases (CO2) are developed for a weekday morning peak-hour modeling period. Numerical experiments on a rapidly growing county in Central Texas, US, indicate that emission estimates are sensitive to all the aforementioned supply-side variables. Most notably, median network-wide estimates are found to increase in magnitude with aggregation of traffic activity and speeds. Effects of link lengths appear to be more prominent in high-speed traffic corridors, such as restricted-access highways, than low-speed unrestricted-access arterials. The latter, however, witness more traffic dynamics and subsequently contribute more to deviation in emission estimates across levels-of-detail. The findings highlight the need to be mindful of such physical sensitivities of emissions while enacting policy decisions, which frequently rely on network-based regional emissions inventories.

Suggested Citation

  • Shah, Rohan & Nezamuddin, N. & Levin, Michael W., 2020. "Supply-side network effects on mobile-source emissions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 21-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:98:y:2020:i:c:p:21-34
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X17304249
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    2. Jochem, Patrick & Doll, Claus & Fichtner, Wolf, 2016. "External costs of electric vehicles," MPRA Paper 91602, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qixiu Cheng & Zhiyuan Liu & Feifei Liu & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Urban dynamic congestion pricing: an overview and emerging research needs," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 3-18, August.
    2. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    3. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Herrera, Juan C. & Bayen, Alexandre M., 2010. "Incorporation of Lagrangian measurements in freeway traffic state estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 460-481, May.
    6. Jinxiao Duan & Guanwen Zeng & Nimrod Serok & Daqing Li & Efrat Blumenfeld Lieberthal & Hai-Jun Huang & Shlomo Havlin, 2023. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of traffic bottlenecks yields an early signal of heavy congestions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Ma, Tao & Zhou, Zhou & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2018. "Dynamic factor model for network traffic state forecast," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 281-317.
    8. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    9. Jin, Wen-Long, 2010. "Continuous kinematic wave models of merging traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1084-1103, September.
    10. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    11. Yang, Lei & Yin, Suwan & Han, Ke & Haddad, Jack & Hu, Minghua, 2017. "Fundamental diagrams of airport surface traffic: Models and applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 29-51.
    12. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "A stochastic dynamic network loading model for mixed traffic with autonomous and human-driven vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Fatemeh Enayatollahi & Ahmed Osman Idris & M. A. Amiri Atashgah, 2019. "Modelling bus bunching under variable transit demand using cellular automata," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 269-298, August.
    14. Kontorinaki, Maria & Spiliopoulou, Anastasia & Roncoli, Claudio & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2017. "First-order traffic flow models incorporating capacity drop: Overview and real-data validation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 52-75.
    15. Ma, Changxi & Guo, Jing & Zhao, Yongpeng, 2023. "Variable speed limit control strategy at the entrance and exit of freeway tunnel," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    16. Daganzo, Carlos F. & So, Stella K., 2011. "Managing evacuation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1424-1432.
    17. Babak Javani & Abbas Babazadeh, 2020. "Path-Based Dynamic User Equilibrium Model with Applications to Strategic Transportation Planning," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 329-366, June.
    18. Zhang, H.M. & Shen, Wei, 2010. "Access control policies without inside queues: Their properties and public policy implications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1132-1147, September.
    19. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Lämmel, Gregor, 2015. "Bidirectional pedestrian fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 194-212.
    20. Malachy Carey & Paul Humphreys & Marie McHugh & Ronan McIvor, 2018. "Consistency and Inconsistency Between the Fundamental Relationships on Which Different Traffic Assignment Models Are Based," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1548-1569, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:98:y:2020:i:c:p:21-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.