Author
Listed:
- Nurduhan, Muammer
- Kamal, Bunyamin
Abstract
Port State Control (PSC) inspections extend beyond the evaluation of a vessel's structural components, machinery, and equipment, encompassing a rigorous verification process of statutory certificates and official documentation. A comprehensive analysis of the empirical data demonstrates that deficiencies falling under the Certificates and Documentation (C&D) category consistently emerge as one of the most prominent and recurrent determinants influencing detention outcomes. The prevention of deficiencies arising from the C&D Code necessitates a systematic investigation into the critical determinants that precipitate vessel detentions due to C&D-related non-conformities. Accordingly, this study undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the interrelationships between multiple influential variables and deficiency classifications, with particular emphasis on their contributory role in detention occurrences attributed to C&D deficiencies within the PSC regime. In this context, the present study proposes a hybrid methodological framework that combines a data-driven Bayesian inference model—specifically utilizing Tree Augmented Naive Bayes (TAN) networks—with an Association Rule Mining (ARM) approach. This framework is applied to an empirical dataset comprising 6079 PSC inspection reports conducted under the Black Sea MoU (BSMOU) between 2003 and 2024. The outcomes of this study indicate that a deficiency count exceeding 20, classification under the 'Others' ship type category, detentions occurring in Romania and Bulgaria, as well as deficiencies related to cargo operations including equipment and the International Safety Management (ISM) Code, are among the most salient factors associated with vessel detentions caused by C&D Code. The results of this study furnish critical insights to port authorities and ship operating entities, thereby supporting the formulation of evidence-based policies and the strategic prioritization of interventions to effectively mitigate the risk of vessel detention.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:176:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.