IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v200y2025ics0965856425002630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering econometric methods with machine learning for policy making: A comparative study in maritime transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ruihan
  • Shang, Tianyu
  • Yang, Dong
  • Yan, Ran

Abstract

The maritime transportation plays a critical role in global trade, yet ensuring its safety and regulatory compliance remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the comparative strengths and limitations of econometric methods and machine learning in supporting policymaking. Leveraging publicly accessible data from port state control (PSC) inspections as the case study, we develop models to identify key factors influencing ship deficiencies (i.e., non-compliance) in PSC and to predict the number of deficiencies during inspections. The results show that machine learning outperforms econometric methods in predictive performance, while econometric methods offer unique advantages in providing interpretable causal insights, enabling a deep understanding of the factors influencing ship deficiencies. Furthermore, by integrating machine learning techniques into econometric frameworks, we uncover nuanced relationships — such as the heterogeneous impact of ship age on ship deficiencies and a U-shaped relationship between ship tonnage and deficiencies — while also enhancing the predictive reliability of econometric methods. By combining the interpretability of econometric methods with the predictive power of machine learning, this study establishes a robust framework for assessing ship risk, enhancing maritime safety management, mitigating maritime risks, and improving transportation policies and regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ruihan & Shang, Tianyu & Yang, Dong & Yan, Ran, 2025. "Empowering econometric methods with machine learning for policy making: A comparative study in maritime transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002630
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.