IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v147y2024icp94-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The actual impact of ride-splitting: An empirical study based on large-scale GPS data

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Xuan
  • Lin, Qinping
  • Jia, Ning
  • Tian, Junfang

Abstract

Online ride-splitting has rapidly evolved worldwide, providing new means to enhance the efficiency of urban travel and reduce the number of vehicles and traffic congestion. While ride-splitting is currently believed to improve vehicle occupancy rates and decrease total travel distances, passengers may perceive it as resulting in additional travel due to ride sharing. To gain a more intuitive understanding of the current operations of ride-splitting, this study delves into carpooling behavior and analyzes its relative impact using GPS trajectory data from DiDi Chuxing in Chengdu, China. The investigation focuses on the behavior of ride-splitting and examines its relative impact based on disparities in total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and travel duration between ride-splitting traveling (RST) and corresponding separated traveling (ST), aiming to estimate the effect of RST on urban mobility. Following are the three main findings of this study: (a) The existing operation of RST induces 7%–10% extra VMT and 20%–35% extra duration for RST users; (b) The RST achieves 30%–35% VMT and 10%–20% duration saving for drivers who are willing to provide RST service; (c) The RST saves up to 10% VMT and duration varying by time in a day. This paper offers some insights to quantify the current impact of RST and evaluate the orientation of mobility service quality improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Xuan & Lin, Qinping & Jia, Ning & Tian, Junfang, 2024. "The actual impact of ride-splitting: An empirical study based on large-scale GPS data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 94-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:147:y:2024:i:c:p:94-112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X23003360
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, Adam & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2018. "Planning for Shared Mobility," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0dk3h89p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Roozbeh Jalali & Seama Koohi-Fayegh & Khalil El-Khatib & Daniel Hoornweg & Heng Li, 2017. "Investigating the Potential of Ridesharing to Reduce Vehicle Emissions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(2), pages 26-40.
    3. Rayle, Lisa & Dai, Danielle & Chan, Nelson & Cervero, Robert & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2016. "Just A Better Taxi? A Survey-Based Comparison of Taxis, Transit, and Ridesourcing Services in San Francisco," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt60v8r346, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Wei Chiang Chan & Wan Hashim Wan Ibrahim & May Chiun Lo & Mohamad Kadim Suaidi & Shiaw Tong Ha, 2020. "Sustainability of Public Transportation: An Examination of User Behavior to Real-Time GPS Tracking Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Judd Cramer & Alan B. Krueger, 2016. "Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 177-182, May.
    6. Alisoltani, Negin & Leclercq, Ludovic & Zargayouna, Mahdi, 2021. "Can dynamic ride-sharing reduce traffic congestion?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 212-246.
    7. He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Portraying ride-hailing mobility using multi-day trip order data: A case study of Beijing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 152-169.
    8. Ziru Li & Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Zhongju Zhang, 2022. "How Do On‐demand Ridesharing Services Affect Traffic Congestion? The Moderating Role of Urban Compactness," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 239-258, January.
    9. Martin, Elliot W & Shaheen, Susan A, 2011. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6wr90040, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Liu, Xiaobing & Yan, Xuedong & Liu, Feng & Wang, Rui & Leng, Yan, 2019. "A trip-specific model for fuel saving estimation and subsidy policy making of carpooling based on empirical data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 295-311.
    11. Xiaowei Chen & Hongyu Zheng & Ze Wang & Xiqun Chen, 2021. "Exploring impacts of on-demand ridesplitting on mobility via real-world ridesourcing data and questionnaires," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1541-1561, August.
    12. Cai, Hua & Wang, Xi & Adriaens, Peter & Xu, Ming, 2019. "Environmental benefits of taxi ride sharing in Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 503-508.
    13. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Biao Yin & Liu Liu & Nicolas Coulombel & Vincent Viguie, 2018. "Appraising the environmental benefits of ride-sharing: The Paris region case study," Post-Print hal-01695082, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Haoran & Chen, Jinyu & Li, Wenjing & Song, Xuan & Shibasaki, Ryosuke, 2020. "Mobile phone GPS data in urban ride-sharing: An assessment method for emission reduction potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Xiaowei Chen & Hongyu Zheng & Ze Wang & Xiqun Chen, 2021. "Exploring impacts of on-demand ridesplitting on mobility via real-world ridesourcing data and questionnaires," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1541-1561, August.
    3. Haoran Chen & Xuedong Yan & Xiaobing Liu & Tao Ma, 2023. "Exploring the operational performance discrepancies between online ridesplitting and carpooling transportation modes based on DiDi data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1923-1958, October.
    4. Qizhao Peng & Weiwei Wang & Xiaoyan Yang & Yi Wang & Jian Chen, 2023. "Research on Affective Interaction in Mini Public Transport Based on IPA-FMEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Zou, Zhenpeng & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2021. "Does ridesourcing impact driving decisions: A survey weighted regression analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-12.
    6. Xu, Zhengtian & Yin, Yafeng & Zha, Liteng, 2017. "Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 559-578.
    7. Michel Noussan & Matteo Jarre, 2021. "Assessing Commuting Energy and Emissions Savings through Remote Working and Carpooling: Lessons from an Italian Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Zgheib, Najib & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Kaysi, Isam, 2020. "Modeling demand for ridesourcing as feeder for high capacity mass transit systems with an application to the planned Beirut BRT," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 70-91.
    9. Hao, Wu & Martin, Layla, 2022. "Prohibiting cherry-picking: Regulating vehicle sharing services who determine fleet and service structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Zhang, Zhaolin & Zhai, Guocong & Xie, Kun & Xiao, Feng, 2022. "Exploring the nonlinear effects of ridesharing on public transit usage: A case study of San Diego," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Jindong Pang & Shulin Shen, 2023. "Do ridesharing services cause traffic congestion?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 520-552, May.
    12. Kent, Jennifer & Dowling, Robyn & Maalsen, Sophia, 2017. "Catalysts for transport transitions: Bridging the gap between disruptions and change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 200-207.
    13. Beojone, Caio Vitor & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "A dynamic multi-region MFD model for ride-sourcing with ridesplitting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Wang, Sicheng & Du, Rui & Lee, Annie S., 2024. "Ridesourcing regulation and traffic speeds: A New York case," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Yanhong Yin & Han Wang & Jimin Xiong & Yufeng Zhu & Zhanfeng Tang, 2021. "Estimation of optimum supply of shared cars based on personal travel behaviors in condition of minimum energy consumption," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13324-13339, September.
    16. Chen, Long & Huang, Jiahui & Jing, Peng & Wang, Bichen & Yu, Xiaozhou & Zha, Ye & Jiang, Chengxi, 2023. "Changing or unchanging Chinese attitudes toward ride-hailing? A social media analytics perspective from 2018 to 2021," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    17. Fayed, Lynn & Nilsson, Gustav & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "On the utilization of dedicated bus lanes for pooled ride-hailing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 29-52.
    18. Sumit Agarwal & Shashwat Alok & Sergio Correia & Deepa Mani & Bernardo Morais, 2024. "Transportation Technology and Gentrification: Evidence from the entry of Ridesharing Services," Papers 2409.15462, arXiv.org.
    19. Sun, Daniel(Jian) & Ding, Xueqing, 2019. "Spatiotemporal evolution of ridesourcing markets under the new restriction policy: A case study in Shanghai," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 227-239.
    20. Zhang, Mengzhu & Zhao, Pengjun & Qiao, Si, 2020. "Smartness-induced transport inequality: Privacy concern, lacking knowledge of smartphone use and unequal access to transport information," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 175-185.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:147:y:2024:i:c:p:94-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.