IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v191y2025ics019126152400256x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process models for discrete choice: Mode choice in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Villarraga, Daniel F.
  • Daziano, Ricardo A.

Abstract

Standard Discrete Choice Models (DCMs) assume that unobserved effects that influence decision-making are independently and identically distributed among individuals. When unobserved effects are spatially correlated, the independence assumption does not hold, leading to biased standard errors and potentially biased parameter estimates. This paper proposes an interpretable Hierarchical Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process (HNNGP) model to account for spatially correlated unobservables in discrete choice analysis. Gaussian Processes (GPs) are often regarded as lacking interpretability due to their non-parametric nature. However, we demonstrate how to incorporate GPs directly into the latent utility specification to flexibly model spatially correlated unobserved effects without sacrificing structural economic interpretation. To empirically test our proposed HNNGP models, we analyze binary and multinomial mode choices for commuting to work in New York City. For the multinomial case, we formulate and estimate HNNGPs with and without independence from irrelevant alternatives (IIA). Building on the interpretability of our modeling strategy, we provide both point estimates and credible intervals for the value of travel time savings in NYC. Finally, we compare the results from all proposed specifications with those derived from a standard logit model and a probit model with spatially autocorrelated errors (SAE) to showcase how accounting for different sources of spatial correlation in discrete choice can significantly impact inference. We also show that the HNNGP models attain better out-of-sample prediction performance when compared to the logit and probit SAE models, especially in the multinomial case.

Suggested Citation

  • Villarraga, Daniel F. & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2025. "Hierarchical Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process models for discrete choice: Mode choice in New York City," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s019126152400256x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2024.103132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126152400256X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s019126152400256x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.