IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v97y2017icp1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Daily activity-travel scheduling behaviour of non-workers in the National Capital Region (NCR) of Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Nurul Habib, Khandker
  • El-Assi, Wafic
  • Hasnine, Md. Sami
  • Lamers, James

Abstract

This paper uses household travel survey data (of the National Capital Region of Canada) and a comprehensive random utility maximizing travel options modelling approach to investigate non-workers’ activity-travel scheduling behaviour. The empirical model reveals that the presence of children shapes the daily activity-travel patterns of non-workers by reducing the flexibility of out-of-home activity-type choices. Availability of private cars increases flexibility in travelling and increases the spread of spatial locations of out-of-home activities of non-workers. Income plays a significant role in non-workers’ activity-travel behaviour and it seems that non-workers from lower to middle-income households are less active (return home early) than those living in higher income households. In general, it is found that male non-workers are less active than the female non-workers and it is also evident that non-workers living in single detached houses are less active (return home early) than those living in condos/apartments. These findings have an implication to health issues as the average age of non-workers is over 50years and the majority of detached houses are far from the central business district.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurul Habib, Khandker & El-Assi, Wafic & Hasnine, Md. Sami & Lamers, James, 2017. "Daily activity-travel scheduling behaviour of non-workers in the National Capital Region (NCR) of Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:97:y:2017:i:c:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416302816
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saleh, Wafaa & Farrell, Séona, 2005. "Implications of congestion charging for departure time choice: Work and non-work schedule flexibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 773-791.
    2. Kim, Seung-Nam & Choo, Sangho & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2015. "Home-based telecommuting and intra-household interactions in work and non-work travel: A seemingly unrelated censored regression approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 197-214.
    3. Etminani-Ghasrodashti, Roya & Ardeshiri, Mahyar, 2016. "The impacts of built environment on home-based work and non-work trips: An empirical study from Iran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 196-207.
    4. Swait, Joffre, 2003. "Flexible Covariance Structures for Categorical Dependent Variables through Finite Mixtures of Generalized Extreme Value Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 80-87, January.
    5. Khandker Habib, 2011. "A random utility maximization (RUM) based dynamic activity scheduling model: Application in weekend activity scheduling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 123-151, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Usman Ahmed & Ana Tsui Moreno & Rolf Moeckel, 2021. "Microscopic activity sequence generation: a multiple correspondence analysis to explain travel behavior based on socio-demographic person attributes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1481-1502, June.
    2. Manish Shirgaokar & Kelly Lanyi-Bennett, 2020. "I’ll have to drive there: How daily time constraints impact women’s car use differently than men’s," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1365-1392, June.
    3. Md Sami Hasnine & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2020. "Modelling the dynamics between tour-based mode choices and tour-timing choices in daily activity scheduling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2635-2669, October.
    4. Usman Ahmed & Ana Tsui Moreno & Rolf Moeckel, 0. "Microscopic activity sequence generation: a multiple correspondence analysis to explain travel behavior based on socio-demographic person attributes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    5. Yangcheng Gu & Haruka Kato & Daisuke Matsushita, 2023. "Relationship between Health Status and Daily Activities Based on Housing Type among Suburban Residents during COVID-19 Self-Isolation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Hasnine, Md Sami & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2018. "What about the dynamics in daily travel mode choices? A dynamic discrete choice approach for tour-based mode choice modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 70-80.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beck, Matthew J. & Hensher, David A., 2022. "Working from home in Australia in 2020: Positives, negatives and the potential for future benefits to transport and society," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 271-284.
    2. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Wang, Wei-Chung & Fu, Chiang, 2012. "Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 545-554.
    3. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A., 2012. "Congestion charging and car use: A review of stated preference and opinion studies and market monitoring evidence," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 47-61.
    4. Ozbilen, Basar & Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2021. "Revisiting the impacts of virtual mobility on travel behavior: An exploration of daily travel time expenditures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 49-62.
    5. Saleh, Wafaa & Farrell, Séona, 2007. "Investigation and analysis of evidence of asymmetric churn in travel demand models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 691-702, August.
    6. Hamid Mostofi & Houshmand Masoumi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2020. "The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services and the Bicycle Mode Choice in Tehran and Cairo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 602-620, August.
    8. Tian, Ye & Li, Yudi & Sun, Jian, 2022. "Stick or carrot for traffic demand management? Evidence from experimental economics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 235-254.
    9. Duco Vos & Evert Meijers & Maarten Ham, 2018. "Working from home and the willingness to accept a longer commute," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 375-398, September.
    10. Friederike Paetz & Winfried J. Steiner, 2017. "The benefits of incorporating utility dependencies in finite mixture probit models," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 793-819, July.
    11. Enayat Mirzaei & Dominique Mignot, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Holgui­n-Veras, Jose & Cetin, Mecit & Xia, Shuwen, 2006. "A comparative analysis of US toll policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 852-871, December.
    13. Blom Västberg, Oskar & Karlström, Anders & Jonsson, Daniel & Sundberg, Marcus, 2016. "Including time in a travel demand model using dynamic discrete choice," MPRA Paper 75336, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Nov 2016.
    14. José Grisolía & Kenneth Willis, 2012. "A latent class model of theatre demand," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(2), pages 113-139, May.
    15. Becky P. Y. Loo & Bo Wang, 2018. "Factors associated with home-based e-working and e-shopping in Nanjing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 365-384, March.
    16. Wei Wu & Binxia Xue & Yan Song & Xujie Gong & Tao Ma, 2023. "Investigating the Impacts of Urban Built Environment on Travel Energy Consumption: A Case Study of Ningbo, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Sheila Ferrer & Tomás Ruiz, 2017. "Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 27-48, January.
    18. Biranchi Adhikari & Ajay Kumar Behera & Rabindra Narayan Mahapatra & Harish Chandra Das, 2022. "Retracted: An empirical model for Indian senior citizens in traffic management," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 35-56, March.
    19. Hensher, David A. & Wei, Edward & Liu, Wen, 2023. "Accounting for the spatial incidence of working from home in an integrated transport and land model system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Dane, Gamze & Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J.P. & Ettema, Dick, 2014. "Simultaneous modeling of individuals’ duration and expenditure decisions in out-of-home leisure activities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 93-103.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:97:y:2017:i:c:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.