Author
Abstract
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) has emerged as a promising mobility option for intra-city, inter-city, and regional trips. However, studies on its critical infrastructure planning (i.e., vertiport and vertipad) often ignore demand heterogeneity and rely on uniform configurations that risk overinvestment. To address this limitation, we develop an integrated optimization framework that jointly determines vertiport locations and vertipad capacities under infrastructure cost, capacity, and demand constraints. The model integrates a multinomial logit formulation to estimate UAM demand with multi-server queuing theory to capture passenger waiting times at vertiports. To solve the resulting nonlinear programming problem, we employ a Lagrangian relaxation approach combined with Benders decomposition. Empirical results from a high-density area in Shanghai show that UAM adoption is driven more by service quality than by network size. Average waiting time and ground access disutility are the dominant determinants: overly strict vertiport service-distance requirements can render deployment infeasible, whereas relaxing them reduces investment but lowers adoption. Sensitivity analyses further indicate that demand-side uncertainty (value of time and public acceptance) primarily affects required vertipad capacity rather than vertiport locations. In addition, flight demand peaks around 20 km, and expanding per-site vertipad limits yields diminishing returns beyond 2–3 vertipads. Overall, these findings suggest that effective UAM planning depends more on meeting passenger expectations than on large-scale infrastructure expansion. The proposed approach offers planners a scalable and practical tool for balancing service quality and cost, ensuring that early-stage UAM deployment avoids overbuilding and remains financially sustainable.
Suggested Citation
Lyu, Ning & Feng, Tao, 2026.
"Integrated planning of vertiports and vertipads infrastructure for Urban Air Mobility,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:209:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001680
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105027
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:209:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.