IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v195y2025ics0965856425000667.html

Can curbside bicycle lanes buffer COVID-19 ridership losses? A case study from Melbourne, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Delbosc, Alexa
  • Goh, Zi Sheng
  • Naseri, Mahsa
  • Powers, Tim

Abstract

Many cities implemented temporary or permanent improvements in safe cycling infrastructure during COVID-19 in a bid to encourage cycling. However, many studies found that cycling during COVID-19 was primarily for recreation and exercise. In contrast, cycling for commuting declined, largely because commuting overall (especially into cities) was partially replaced by working from home. In 2020 and 2021, the City of Melbourne fast-tracked a range of cycling infrastructure upgrades in an effort to attract more workers back into the city using this sustainable transport mode. The upgrades were relatively modest – ranging from extending curb-protected lanes through a single intersection, to replacing a few kilometres of painted lane with a protected bike lane. This study examines how patterns of bicycle riding have changed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, using bicycle count data from 15 automatic counters within 5 km of Melbourne’s city center. In addition, this paper isolates the impact of COVID-era infrastructure upgrades against the backdrop of huge fluctuations in bike riding from 2019 to 2022. Multi-level generalized linear modelling found that weekday bicycle counts were significantly dampened during lockdown and remain below pre-COVID levels on weekdays and at sites on off-road bicycle paths. However, when controlling for lockdown stage and seasonality, the average daily count at sites near upgraded infrastructure were 7.4 % higher (855 per day) than counts from sites that were never, or not yet, near upgrades (796 per day). This increase is notable given that almost all counter locations saw declines in bicycle counts even through 2022. These findings are particularly relevant for cities that are grappling with whether to continue with temporary or long-term cycling infrastructure upgrades. This study suggests that even relatively modest upgrades to cycling networks can have a measurable impact on cycling rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Delbosc, Alexa & Goh, Zi Sheng & Naseri, Mahsa & Powers, Tim, 2025. "Can curbside bicycle lanes buffer COVID-19 ridership losses? A case study from Melbourne, Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000667
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000667
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinhyun Hong & David Philip McArthur & Mark Livingston, 2020. "The evaluation of large cycling infrastructure investments in Glasgow using crowdsourced cycle data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 2859-2872, December.
    2. Jochen Kruppa & Ludwig Hothorn, 2021. "A comparison study on modeling of clustered and overdispersed count data for multiple comparisons," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(16), pages 3220-3232, December.
    3. Sabouri, Sadegh & Tian, Guang & Ewing, Reid & Park, Keunhyun & Greene, William, 2021. "The built environment and vehicle ownership modeling: Evidence from 32 diverse regions in the U.S," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Skov-Petersen, Hans & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl & Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth & Thomas Alexander, Sick Nielsen & Rask, Simon, 2017. "Effects of upgrading to cycle highways - An analysis of demand induction, use patterns and satisfaction before and after," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 203-210.
    5. Susan Handy & Bert van Wee & Maarten Kroesen, 2014. "Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 4-24, January.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:2mzuy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Combs, Tabitha & Pardo, Carlos F., 2021. "Shifting Streets COVID-19 Mobility Data: Findings from a global dataset and a research agenda for transport planning and policy," SocArXiv 2mzuy, Center for Open Science.
    8. Pritchard, Ray & Bucher, Dominik & Frøyen, Yngve, 2019. "Does new bicycle infrastructure result in new or rerouted bicyclists? A longitudinal GPS study in Oslo," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 113-125.
    9. Jinhyun Hong & David McArthur & Varun Raturi, 2020. "Did Safe Cycling Infrastructure Still Matter During a COVID-19 Lockdown?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Macedo Filho, Francisco Edson & Ploegmakers, Huub & de Kruijf, Joost & Bussche, Dirk, 2024. "Cycle highway effects: Assessing modal choice to cycling in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Elise Desjardins & Christopher D. Higgins & Darren M. Scott & Emma Apatu & Antonio Páez, 2022. "Correlates of bicycling trip flows in Hamilton, Ontario: fastest, quietest, or balanced routes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 867-895, June.
    3. Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Pojani, Dorina, 2024. "The effect of fuel price fluctuations on utilitarian cycling rates: A survey of cyclists in Vietnam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Naseri, Mahsa & Delbosc, Alexa & Kamruzzaman, Liton, 2023. "The role of neighbourhood design in cycling activity during COVID-19: An exploration of the Melbourne experience," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    5. Ploegmakers, Huub & Lagendijk, Arnoud, 2024. "Explaining the diffusion of Dutch express bikeways through QCA: The importance of pilots, collaboration and external funding," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Higuera-Mendieta, Diana & Uriza, Pablo Andrés & Cabrales, Sergio A. & Medaglia, Andrés L. & Guzman, Luis A. & Sarmiento, Olga L., 2021. "Is the built-environment at origin, on route, and at destination associated with bicycle commuting? A gender-informed approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Raturi, Varun & McArthur, David Philip & Hong, Jinhyun, 2024. "Re-examining the role of street network configuration on bicycle commuting using crowdsourced data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Koglin, Till, 2015. "Organisation does matter – planning for cycling in Stockholm and Copenhagen," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 55-62.
    9. Jie Gao & Dick Ettema & Marco Helbich & Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis, 2019. "Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2441-2463, December.
    10. Molloy, Joseph & Schatzmann, Thomas & Schoeman, Beaumont & Tchervenkov, Christopher & Hintermann, Beat & Axhausen, Kay W., 2021. "Observed impacts of the Covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in Switzerland based on a large GPS panel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 43-51.
    11. Alexandros Nikitas, 2019. "How to Save Bike-Sharing: An Evidence-Based Survival Toolkit for Policy-Makers and Mobility Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Ma, Liang & Ye, Runing, 2019. "Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 130-141.
    13. Roman Dostál & Josef Kocourek & Aneta Matysková & Karolína Moudrá & Vojtěch Nižňanský, 2021. "The Implementation of the Smart City Process—Researchers’ Knowledge in Detecting Transport System Defects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Srisan, Tat & Bills, Tierra, 2024. "A case for race and space in auto ownership modeling: A Los Angeles County study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 182-197.
    15. Mário Meireles & Paulo J. G. Ribeiro, 2020. "Digital Platform/Mobile App to Boost Cycling for the Promotion of Sustainable Mobility in Mid-Sized Starter Cycling Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    16. Te Ma & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Mujahid Ali & Rosilawati Zainol & Amin Jan & Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed & Abdullah Mohamed, 2022. "Nonlinear Relationships between Vehicle Ownership and Household Travel Characteristics and Built Environment Attributes in the US Using the XGBT Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Enayat Mirzaei & Dominique Mignot, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Paulsen, Mads & Rich, Jeppe, 2023. "Societally optimal expansion of bicycle networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Silva, Cecília & Teixeira, João & Proença, Ana & Bicalho, Tamara & Cunha, Isabel & Aguiar, Ana, 2019. "Revealing the cycling potential of starter cycling cities: Usefulness for planning practice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 138-147.
    20. Maribel Parra-Saldías & Jose Castro-Piñero & Antonio Castillo Paredes & Ximena Palma Leal & Ximena Díaz Martínez & Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2018. "Active Commuting Behaviours from High School to University in Chile: A Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.