IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v155y2022icp484-500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refined choice set generation and the investigation of multi-criteria transit route choice behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Tomhave, Benjamin J.
  • Khani, Alireza

Abstract

To best make informed public transportation decisions, agencies must be aware of how individuals interact with the transit system. The key question to consider is how do passengers get from Point A to Point B and which attributes of the transit trip have the largest influence on that choice? To more accurately understand passengers’ interaction with transit systems, a new method for transit route choice estimation is proposed. This method modifies and builds upon a schedule-based forward label setting multi-criteria shortest path algorithm by introducing an iterative trip elimination methodology. This new methodology yields high quality transit path choice sets with exact regeneration of 70.5% of the observed paths. Moreover, detailed temporal information on all types of network links (in-vehicle, walking, and waiting) are produced with reasonable computational time of 0.5 s per path calculation and 6.9 s per individual’s choice set generation. This increased specificity, in turn, heightens the validity and accuracy of the route choice model. Passenger information is sampled from a transit on-board survey containing origin–destination locations, demographic details, and trip-specific attributes. A multinomial logit model with stop-level path size correction term is estimated. This estimation yields a 67% recovery rate between the path with the highest estimated likelihood and the surveyed (taken) transit path. Furthermore, a transfer penalty of 28.8 min was estimated while the marginal rates of substitution for the waiting and walking time coefficients are in close alignment with similar values in the literature. Express bus routes were found to have a statistically significant negative impact on path utility for the lowest income thresholds while transitways (light rail, bus rapid transit, or commuter rail) had a positive associated perception for the highest household income class. Thus, support is found for the claim that transitways can potentially attract higher-income “choice” riders to the transit network. The results of this research can be used to improve ridership projections and highlight areas for policy improvements that could have the largest impact on retaining and attracting new passengers to the transit system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomhave, Benjamin J. & Khani, Alireza, 2022. "Refined choice set generation and the investigation of multi-criteria transit route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 484-500.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:155:y:2022:i:c:p:484-500
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856421002846
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alireza Khani & Mark Hickman & Hyunsoo Noh, 2015. "Trip-Based Path Algorithms Using the Transit Network Hierarchy," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 635-653, September.
    2. Vande Walle, Stefaan & Steenberghen, Therese, 2006. "Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 151-162, February.
    3. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M. & Ben-Akiva, M., 2009. "Sampling of alternatives for route choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 984-994, December.
    4. Garcia-Martinez, Andres & Cascajo, Rocio & Jara-Diaz, Sergio R. & Chowdhury, Subeh & Monzon, Andres, 2018. "Transfer penalties in multimodal public transport networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 52-66.
    5. Brathwaite, Timothy & Walker, Joan L., 2018. "Asymmetric, closed-form, finite-parameter models of multinomial choice," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 78-112.
    6. Shlomo Bekhor & Moshe Ben-Akiva & M. Ramming, 2006. "Evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for route choice models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 235-247, April.
    7. Azevedo, JoseAugusto & Santos Costa, Maria Emilia O. & Silvestre Madeira, Joaquim Joao E. R. & Vieira Martins, Ernesto Q., 1993. "An algorithm for the ranking of shortest paths," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 97-106, August.
    8. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks," SocArXiv q86sd, Center for Open Science.
    9. Guido Gentile & Sang Nguyen & Stefano Pallottino, 2005. "Route Choice on Transit Networks with Online Information at Stops," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 289-297, August.
    10. Ikki Kim & Hyoung-Chul Kim & Dong-Jeong Seo & Jung In Kim, 0. "Calibration of a transit route choice model using revealed population data of smartcard in a multimodal transit network," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    11. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M., 2007. "Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 363-378, March.
    12. Wei Zhu & Wei-li Fan & Amr M. Wahaballa & Jin Wei, 2020. "Calibrating travel time thresholds with cluster analysis and AFC data for passenger reasonable route generation on an urban rail transit network," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3069-3090, December.
    13. Marie Karen Anderson & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2017. "Multimodal route choice models of public transport passengers in the Greater Copenhagen Area," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 221-245, September.
    14. Guo, Zhan & Wilson, Nigel H.M., 2011. "Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: A case study of the London Underground," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 91-104, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yang & Feng, Tao & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Mingwei, 2022. "Understanding the route choice behaviour of metro-bikeshare users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 460-475.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazagli, Evanthia & Bierlaire, Michel & Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2016. "Revisiting the route choice problem: A modeling framework based on mental representations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-23.
    2. Li, Dawei & Feng, Siqi & Song, Yuchen & Lai, Xinjun & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2023. "Asymmetric closed-form route choice models: Formulations and comparative applications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Hess, Stephane & Quddus, Mohammed & Rieser-Schüssler, Nadine & Daly, Andrew, 2015. "Developing advanced route choice models for heavy goods vehicles using GPS data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 29-44.
    4. Khani, Alireza, 2019. "An online shortest path algorithm for reliable routing in schedule-based transit networks considering transfer failure probability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 549-564.
    5. Carlo Prato & Shlomo Bekhor & Cristina Pronello, 2012. "Latent variables and route choice behavior," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 299-319, March.
    6. Evanthia Kazagli & Michel Bierlaire & Matthieu de Lapparent, 2020. "Operational route choice methodologies for practical applications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 43-74, February.
    7. Guo, Zhan & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2013. "Pedestrian environment and route choice: evidence from New York City and Hong Kong," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 124-136.
    8. Nassir, Neema & Hickman, Mark & Ma, Zhen-Liang, 2019. "A strategy-based recursive path choice model for public transit smart card data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 528-548.
    9. S. F. A. Batista & Ludovic Leclercq, 2019. "Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment Framework for Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Multi-regions Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1563-1590, November.
    10. Jara-Diaz, Sergio & Monzon, Andres & Cascajo, Rocio & Garcia-Martinez, Andres, 2022. "An international time equivalency of the pure transfer penalty in urban transit trips: Closing the gap," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 48-55.
    11. Nielsen, Otto Anker & Eltved, Morten & Anderson, Marie Karen & Prato, Carlo Giacomo, 2021. "Relevance of detailed transfer attributes in large-scale multimodal route choice models for metropolitan public transport passengers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 76-92.
    12. Mohammad Nurul Hassan & Taha Hossein Rashidi & Neema Nassir, 2021. "Consideration of different travel strategies and choice set sizes in transit path choice modelling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 723-746, April.
    13. Dieter, Peter & Caron, Matthew & Schryen, Guido, 2023. "Integrating driver behavior into last-mile delivery routing: Combining machine learning and optimization in a hybrid decision support framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 283-300.
    14. Moshe Ben-Akiva & Song Gao & Lu Lu & Yang Wen, 2015. "DTA2012 Symposium: Combining Disaggregate Route Choice Estimation with Aggregate Calibration of a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 559-581, September.
    15. Papola, Andrea & Tinessa, Fiore & Marzano, Vittorio, 2018. "Application of the Combination of Random Utility Models (CoRUM) to route choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 304-326.
    16. Liu, Yang & Feng, Tao & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Mingwei, 2022. "Understanding the route choice behaviour of metro-bikeshare users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 460-475.
    17. Ding-Mastera, Jing & Gao, Song & Jenelius, Erik & Rahmani, Mahmood & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2019. "A latent-class adaptive routing choice model in stochastic time-dependent networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-17.
    18. Jiao Ye & Jun Chen & Hua Bai & Yifan Yue, 2018. "Analyzing Transfer Commuting Attitudes Using a Market Segmentation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Bekhor, Shlomo & Prato, Carlo Giacomo, 2009. "Methodological transferability in route choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 422-437, May.
    20. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2021. "Shortest paths, travel costs, and traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 828-844, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:155:y:2022:i:c:p:484-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.