IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v81y2025ics0160791x25000570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of artificial intelligence in smart city systems usage: drivers, barriers, and behavioural outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Ferreira dos Santos, Joao Pedro
  • de Matos, Celso Augusto
  • Groznik, Aleš

Abstract

Smart city and smart home systems are among the most impactful technological advancements of recent years, offering innovative solutions while also presenting new challenges for businesses and society. This study aims to investigate the antecedents (both drivers and barriers) of smart city system adoption, specifically those that incorporate artificial intelligence, and to analyse their effects on behavioral outcomes—more specifically, well-being and individual impact. The proposed model was tested using structural equation modelling with data from a survey of 211 individuals in Portugal. The main findings indicate that ubiquity and gamification were the most influential drivers of smart city system adoption. Conversely, perceived risks associated with these systems hindered their adoption. Additionally, our study demonstrated that trust significantly interacts with empowerment, perceived risk, and usage intention. Finally, usage intention was found to have a positive impact on well-being and individual outcomes in daily life.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferreira dos Santos, Joao Pedro & de Matos, Celso Augusto & Groznik, Aleš, 2025. "The role of artificial intelligence in smart city systems usage: drivers, barriers, and behavioural outcomes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000570
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000570
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constance Elise Porter & Naveen Donthu, 2008. "Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 113-128, January.
    2. Lin, Tung-Ching & Huang, Shiu-Li & Hsu, Chieh-Ju, 2015. "A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product – The case of smartphones," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 215-228.
    3. Carmen Isensee & Frank Teuteberg & Kai‐Michael Griese, 2023. "How can corporate culture contribute to emission reduction in the construction sector? An SME case study on beliefs, actions, and outcomes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 1005-1022, March.
    4. Bettina Distel & Holger Koelmann & Ralf Plattfaut & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 789-818, December.
    5. Mariani, Marcello M. & Machado, Isa & Magrelli, Vittoria & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa & Colomer-Llinàs, Joan & Meléndez-Frigola, Joaquim, 2015. "Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 611-622.
    7. Zhang, Nan & Hwang, Bon-Gang & Lu, Yujie & Ngo, Jasmine, 2022. "A Behavior theory integrated ANN analytical approach for understanding households adoption decisions of residential photovoltaic (RPV) system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Rajiv Kumar & Arindam Mukherjee & Amit Sachan, 2023. "Factors influencing indirect adoption of e-Government services: a qualitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 471-504, September.
    9. Teng, Qiuling & Bai, Xiaoyu & Apuke, Oberiri Destiny, 2024. "Modelling the factors that affect the intention to adopt emerging digital technologies for a sustainable smart world city," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Tuba Bakıcı & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2013. "A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(2), pages 135-148, June.
    11. Ronald T. Cenfetelli & Andrew Schwarz, 2011. "Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 808-823, December.
    12. Shuhaiber, Ahmed & Mashal, Ibrahim, 2019. "Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    13. Barbieri, Roberta & Coluccia, Benedetta & Natale, Francesco, 2025. "How are smart city policies progressing in Italy? Insights from SDG indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Mirjana Stojanović & Miloš Radenković & Snežana Popović & Svetlana Mitrović & Zorica Bogdanović, 2023. "A readiness assessment framework for the adoption of 5G based smart-living services," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 389-413, June.
    16. El Hedhli, Kamel & Chebat, Jean-Charles & Sirgy, M. Joseph, 2013. "Shopping well-being at the mall: Construct, antecedents, and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 856-863.
    17. Zeng, Fangui & Wang, Mengmeng & Li, Lingzhe & Cai, Siqi, 2023. "Survey on the acceptance of smart cars amongst middle-aged and elderly in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Miguel Castro Neto & João Sousa Rego, 2019. "Urban Intelligence for Sustainability," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Isabel Ramos & Rui Quaresma & Paulo Silva & Tiago Oliveira (ed.), Information Systems for Industry 4.0, pages 139-159, Springer.
    21. Abdulrahman Habib & Duha Alsmadi & Victor R. Prybutok, 2020. "Factors that determine residents’ acceptance of smart city technologies," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 610-623, June.
    22. Patrick Mikalef & Kieran Conboy & Jenny Eriksson Lundström & Aleš Popovič, 2022. "Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 257-268, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elda Cina & Ersin Elbasi & Gremina Elmazi & Zakwan AlArnaout, 2025. "The Role of AI in Predictive Modelling for Sustainable Urban Development: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-39, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parul Gupta & Sumedha Chauhan & M. P. Jaiswal, 2019. "Classification of Smart City Research - a Descriptive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 661-685, June.
    2. Kumar, Aman & Shankar, Amit & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Behl, Abhishek & Lim, Weng Marc, 2025. "Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) revolution: A deep dive into GenAI adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Schiavone, Francesco & Paolone, Francesco & Mancini, Daniela, 2019. "Business model innovation for urban smartization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 210-219.
    4. Marchesani, Filippo & Masciarelli, Francesca & Bikfalvi, Andrea, 2023. "Smart city as a hub for talent and innovative companies: Exploring the (dis) advantages of digital technology implementation in cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Marchesani, Filippo & Ceci, Federica, 2025. "A quadruple helix view on smart city: Exploring the effect of internal and external open innovation on public services digitalization," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Teng, Qiuling & Bai, Xiaoyu & Apuke, Oberiri Destiny, 2024. "Modelling the factors that affect the intention to adopt emerging digital technologies for a sustainable smart world city," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhou, Tao & Wang, Di, 2020. "Tracking the evolution processes of smart cities in China by assessing performance and efficiency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Dashkevych, Oleg & Portnov, Boris A., 2023. "Human-centric, sustainability-driven approach to ranking smart cities worldwide," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Luisa Errichiello & Roberto Micera, 2018. "Leveraging Smart Open Innovation for Achieving Cultural Sustainability: Learning from a New City Museum Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.
    11. Yadav, Rambalak & Giri, Arunangshu & Chatterjee, Satakshi, 2022. "Understanding the users' motivation and barriers in adopting healthcare apps: A mixed-method approach using behavioral reasoning theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    12. Trinh Le Tan & Khanh Nguyen Chau Ngoc & Hien Le Thi Thanh & Hoai Nguyen Thi Thu & Uyen Vo Truong Hoang, 2024. "Enhancing Repurchase Intention on Digital Platforms Based on Shopping Well-Being Through Shopping Value, Trust and Impulsive Buying," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    13. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    15. Maggioni, Isabella & Sands, Sean & Kachouie, Reza & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2019. "Shopping for well-being: The role of consumer decision-making styles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 21-32.
    16. Gilboa, Shaked & Mitchell, Vince, 2020. "The role of culture and purchasing power parity in shaping mall-shoppers’ profiles," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    18. Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Elisa Frutos-Bernal & Ángel Martín del Rey & Irene Mariñas-Collado & María Teresa Santos-Martín, 2022. "An Analysis of Travel Patterns in Barcelona Metro Using Tucker3 Decomposition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Olivier Arsène & Claudio Vitari, 2022. "L'effet modérateur de la littératie numérique dans l'adoption des technologies de santé connectées pour le traitement des maladies chroniques," Post-Print hal-03876766, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.