IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v77y2024ics0160791x24000617.html

Just transitions and sociotechnical innovation in the social housing sector: An assemblage analysis of residents’ perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Cotton, Matthew
  • Van Schaik, Paul
  • Vall, Natasha
  • Lorrimer, Susan
  • Mountain, Andrea
  • Stubbs, Rosemary
  • Leighton, Charlotte
  • Leon, Edgar Segovia
  • Imani, Elena

Abstract

Creating low-carbon pathways for domestic electricity and heating is a core aspect of the UK Government's housing strategy. Understanding issues of energy justice and the socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon innovation are vital for successfully implementing new technologies and retrofit measures across diverse communities and different housing types. The social housing sector is particularly important in the study of just domestic low-carbon transitions due to the challenges faced by residents concerning energy affordability and insecurity during the ongoing cost of living crisis in the UK. This qualitative study, conducted in the Northeast of England, adopts an assemblage thinking approach to examine the experiences of social housing residents. Through thematic analysis of interviewee responses, we identify themes related to cost and affordability; decision-making dynamics and energy justice; disruption, retrofit and ‘fabric first’; energy autonomy and the practicalities of technology choice; and environmental values and collective climate action. We find that justice in the low-carbon home requires social housing organisations to strengthen mechanisms for resident engagement and interconnectedness before retrofit roll-out, to identify independent sources and arbiters of information on upfront and long-term energy costs, to ensure effective mechanisms for the social control of energy use, and to provide a platform to encourage nascent energy citizenship through which residents link pro-environmental behaviours in the home to broader networks of social action on climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Cotton, Matthew & Van Schaik, Paul & Vall, Natasha & Lorrimer, Susan & Mountain, Andrea & Stubbs, Rosemary & Leighton, Charlotte & Leon, Edgar Segovia & Imani, Elena, 2024. "Just transitions and sociotechnical innovation in the social housing sector: An assemblage analysis of residents’ perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:77:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24000617
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24000617
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricci, Miriam & Bellaby, Paul & Flynn, Rob, 2010. "Engaging the public on paths to sustainable energy: Who has to trust whom?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 2633-2640, June.
    2. Asaee, S. Rasoul & Sharafian, Amir & Herrera, Omar E. & Blomerus, Paul & Mérida, Walter, 2018. "Housing stock in cold-climate countries: Conversion challenges for net zero emission buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 88-100.
    3. Evans, Geoff & Phelan, Liam, 2016. "Transition to a post-carbon society: Linking environmental justice and just transition discourses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-339.
    4. Tarasova, Ekaterina & Rohracher, Harald, 2023. "Marginalising household users in smart grids," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Rosalyn A. V. Robison & Cathrine V. Jansson-Boyd, 2013. "Perspectives on Sustainability: Exploring the Views of Tenants in Supported Social Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Wei, Wu & Skye, Harrison M., 2021. "Residential net-zero energy buildings: Review and perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Fleiß, Eva & Hatzl, Stefanie & Rauscher, Jürgen, 2024. "Smart energy technology: A survey of adoption by individuals and the enabling potential of the technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Cooke, R. & Cripps, A. & Irwin, A. & Kolokotroni, M., 2007. "Alternative energy technologies in buildings: Stakeholder perceptions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(14), pages 2320-2333.
    9. Owen, A. & Mitchell, G. & Gouldson, A., 2014. "Unseen influence—The role of low carbon retrofit advisers and installers in the adoption and use of domestic energy technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 169-179.
    10. Coenen, Lars & Raven, Rob & Verbong, Geert, 2010. "Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: A theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 295-302.
    11. Broad, Oliver & Hawker, Graeme & Dodds, Paul E., 2020. "Decarbonising the UK residential sector: The dependence of national abatement on flexible and local views of the future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Höfer, Tim & Madlener, Reinhard, 2020. "A participatory stakeholder process for evaluating sustainable energy transition scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Assefa, G. & Frostell, B., 2007. "Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 63-78.
    14. David Byrne, 2002. "Industrial culture in a post-industrial world: The case of the North East of England," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 279-289, November.
    15. Galvin, Ray & Sunikka-Blank, Minna, 2014. "The UK homeowner-retrofitter as an innovator in a socio-technical system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 655-662.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seymour, V. & Cárdenas, B. & Urquhart, A. & Pottie, D.L. & Day, J. & de Oliveira Júnior, M.M. & Barbour, E. & Wilson, G. & Garvey, S. & Jones, C.R., 2025. "Feeling the heat: Understanding stakeholders’ perceptions of residential-sector heating decarbonisation options in the UK," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Paul van Schaik & Heather Clements & Yordanka Karayaneva & Elena Imani & Michael Knowles & Natasha Vall & Matthew Cotton, 2025. "Using Machine Learning to Model the Acceptance of Domestic Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-34, July.
    3. Hannan, M.A. & Nair, Mahendhiran S. & Ahmed, Pervaiz K. & Vaithilingam, Santha & Wali, Safat B. & Reza, M.S. & Abu, Sayem M. & Ker, Pin Jern & Begum, R.A. & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Ng, Denny K.S. & Jang, G, 2025. "Return on values of hydrogen energy transitions: A perspective on the conceptual framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Lykouras, Ioannis & Mora, Luca, 2025. "Material matters: Recommendations for the analysis of relational spaces in sociotechnical transition studies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariusz Kruczek & Malgorzata Markowska & Aikaterini Servou & Christos Roumpos & Eleni Mertiri & Priscilla Ernst & Jaroslaw Darmosz & Thomas Kempka, 2025. "Navigating Socio-Technical Challenges in Energy Efficiency: Case Studies on Hybrid Pumped-Hydropower Storage in Poland and Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Mignon, Ingrid & Winberg, Lisa, 2023. "The role of public energy advising in sustainability transitions – empirical evidence from Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Miguel Macias Sequeira & João Pedro Gouveia, 2022. "A Sequential Multi-Staged Approach for Developing Digital One-Stop Shops to Support Energy Renovations of Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    5. Usha Devi Raman & Shishi Kumar Piaralal & Nur Amalina Zulkefli & Yon Rosli Daud & Sazrin Mohd Mohtar & Ahmad Aiman Dahakim, 2025. "Sustainable Energy Transition among SMEs: Conceptualizing Determinants of Intention to Adopt Solar Energy Technology," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 8162-8173, September.
    6. Yin, Linfei & Xiong, Yi, 2024. "Incremental learning user profile and deep reinforcement learning for managing building energy in heating water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    7. O’Keeffe, Juliette M. & Gilmour, Daniel & Simpson, Edward, 2016. "A network approach to overcoming barriers to market engagement for SMEs in energy efficiency initiatives such as the Green Deal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 582-590.
    8. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Antoine Boche & Clément Foucher & Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, 2022. "Understanding Microgrid Sustainability: A Systemic and Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    10. Thøgersen, John, 2017. "Housing-related lifestyle and energy saving: A multi-level approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 73-87.
    11. Despoina Antypa & Foteini Petrakli & Anastasia Gkika & Pamela Voigt & Alexander Kahnt & Robert Böhm & Jan Suchorzewski & Andreia Araújo & Susana Sousa & Elias P. Koumoulos, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Building Components towards NZEBs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Kupeli, Birgul & Salman, Gulberk Gultekin & Karaosmanoglu, Elif & Daim, Tugrul, 2024. "Exploring self-service technology adoption: Case of airline check in," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2016. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 309-317.
    14. Diao, Kelong & Dong, Tianheng & Yang, Moucun & Lu, Jingui & Zhu, Yuezhao, 2025. "Surface-modified WO2.9/oil nanofluid with self-forming Si-O-Si encapsulation for ultra-stable spectral splitting in solar PV/T systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    15. Ana Beatriz Hernández-Lara & Juan Pablo Gonzales-Bustos & Amado Alarcón-Alarcón, 2021. "Social Sustainability on Corporate Boards: The Effects of Female Family Members on R&D," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Ponce, Pedro & Polasko, Kenneth & Molina, Arturo, 2016. "End user perceptions toward smart grid technology: Acceptance, adoption, risks, and trust," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 587-598.
    17. Vesely, Stepan, 2025. "Evidence on environmentally conscious consumers’ preferences for energy-use automation in Germany and Spain," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Adams, Michelle & Wheeler, David & Woolston, Genna, 2011. "A participatory approach to sustainable energy strategy development in a carbon-intensive jurisdiction: The case of Nova Scotia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2550-2559, May.
    19. Sebastian Schär & Jutta Geldermann, 2021. "Adopting Multiactor Multicriteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Energy Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Julia Maria Wittmayer & Tessa de Geus & Bonno Pel & Flor Avelino & Sabine Hielscher & Thomas Hoppe & Marie Susan Mühlemeier & Agata Stasik & Sem Oxenaar & Karoline K.S. Rogge & Vivian Visser & Esther , 2020. "Beyond instrumentalism: Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312323, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:77:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24000617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.