IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v127y2023ics0166497223001621.html

Antecedents of successful diffusion of breakthrough innovations past the formative phase: Perceptions of innovation-engaged practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Talavera Fabra, Irene
  • Ghobadian, Abby
  • Troise, Ciro
  • Bresciani, Stefano

Abstract

Many promising breakthrough innovations (BTIs) fail to diffuse beyond the formative phase, adversely impacting social and economic outcomes. Why this is the case is unclear. We advance knowledge by identifying the general antecedents of innovation success - irrespective of innovation type or phase - shared between at least two of the four principal innovation theories. These shared general antecedents of success underpin a survey instrument used to identify antecedents of successful diffusion of BTIs past the formative phase and the nature of their contribution from the perspective of two different types of practitioners – innovation-engaged entrepreneurs and R&D executives. Ascertaining the views of practitioners is pertinent to determining the utility of theory and its practical applicability. Our analysis points to: (a) the practical utility of the theoretical antecedents of innovation; and (b) the disproportionate influence of some of the general antecedents of success on the diffusion of BTIs past the formative phase. We found that characteristics of interaction, legitimisation process, trust, and catalytic actors play a critical role. On the other hand, effect of formal and informal institution and power asymmetry was ambiguous. Finally, there were differences between perceptions of practitioners pointing to the importance of practitioner type as a contextual factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Talavera Fabra, Irene & Ghobadian, Abby & Troise, Ciro & Bresciani, Stefano, 2023. "Antecedents of successful diffusion of breakthrough innovations past the formative phase: Perceptions of innovation-engaged practitioners," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s0166497223001621
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223001621
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Utterback, James M & Abernathy, William J, 1975. "A dynamic model of process and product innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 3(6), pages 639-656, December.
    2. Richard R. Nelson & Sidney G. Winter, 2002. "Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 23-46, Spring.
    3. Peter Schmidt, 2018. "Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? A critique from an evolutionary perspective," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 785-803, September.
    4. Carlsson, B & Stankiewicz, R, 1991. "On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 93-118, April.
    5. Meade, Nigel & Islam, Towhidul, 2006. "Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation - A 25-year review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 519-545.
    6. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    7. Gyeongcheol Cho & Heungsun Hwang & Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle, 2020. "Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(4), pages 189-202, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongyi Chen & Turuna Seecharan & Chen Feng, 2024. "Promoting the Diffusion of Sustainable Innovations through Customer Education—A Case of the Cosmetic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Danneels, Erwin & Colarelli-O'Connor, Gina, 2025. "From new venture idea to viable business: Breakthrough innovation capability in established firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Sáenz-Royo, Carlos & Hermoso, Ramón & Chiclana, Francisco, 2025. "Wind of change for agent decisions and innovation diffusion: The ASPID predictive model for technology adoption," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Hui Guang & Ying Liu & Jiao Feng & Nan Wang, 2024. "Smart Manufacturing and Enterprise Breakthrough Innovation: Co-Existence Test of “U-Shaped” and Inverted “U-Shaped” Relationships in Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Modgil, Sachin & Gupta, Shivam & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Tuunanen, Tuure, 2025. "How could Generative AI support and add value to non-technology companies – A qualitative study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Lai, Jiun-Yan & Hung, Shih-Chang, 2025. "A socio-cognitive analysis of innovation diffusion: Interventionism and substantiveness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karlsson, Charlie & Johansson, Börje, 2006. "Regional Development and Knowledge," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 76, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    2. Paredes-Frigolett, Harold & Pyka, Andreas & Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua, 2021. "On the performance and strategy of innovation systems: A multicriteria group decision analysis approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Brian Chi-ang Lin & Siqi Zheng & Xiangzheng Deng & Zhan Wang & Chunhong Zhao, 2016. "Economic Evolution In China Ecologically Fragile Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 552-576, July.
    4. Dorota Ciołek & Anna Golejewska, 2022. "Efficiency Determinants of Regional Innovation Systems in Polish Subregions," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 24-45.
    5. Berg, S. & Wustmans, M. & Bröring, S., 2019. "Identifying first signals of emerging dominance in a technological innovation system: A novel approach based on patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 706-722.
    6. repec:osf:thesis:7zprk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Darío Vázquez, 2020. "Variety patterns in defense and health technological systems: evidence from international trade data," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 949-988, September.
    8. Ciołek, Dorota & Golejewska, Anna, . "Determinanty efektywności regionalnych systemów innowacyjnych w polskich podregionach," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2022(3).
    9. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," KRTK-KTI WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    10. Mazaheri, Maryam & Bonnin Roca, Jaime & Markus, Arjan & Tur, Elena M. & Walrave, Bob, 2024. "Maturity assessment of green patent clusters: Methodological implications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    11. Bento, Nuno & Nuñez-Jimenez, Alejandro & Kittner, Noah, 2025. "Decline processes in technological innovation systems: Lessons from energy technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    12. Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Measuring process innovation output in firms: Cost reduction versus quality improvement," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Cardol, Hanna & Mignon, Ingrid & Lantz, Björn, 2025. "Rethinking the forecasting of innovation diffusion: A combined actor- and system approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Marlene O’Sullivan, 2020. "Industrial life cycle: relevance of national markets in the development of new industries for energy technologies – the case of wind energy," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1063-1107, September.
    15. Verónica Robert & Gabriel Yoguel & Octavio Lerena, 2017. "The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 761-793, September.
    16. Markard, Jochen, 2020. "The life cycle of technological innovation systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Rammer, Christian, 2022. "Measuring process innovation output: Results from firm-level panel data," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-002, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Huang, Y.H. & Wu, J.H., 2007. "Technological system and renewable energy policy: A case study of solar photovoltaic in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 345-356, February.
    19. Safarzyńska, Karolina & Frenken, Koen & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2012. "Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1011-1024.
    20. Bent Dalum & Christian Ø.R. Pedersen & Gert Villumsen, 2002. "Technoligical Life Cycles Regional Clusters Facing Disruption," DRUID Working Papers 02-10, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    21. Auke Hoekstra & Maarten Steinbuch & Geert Verbong, 2017. "Creating Agent-Based Energy Transition Management Models That Can Uncover Profitable Pathways to Climate Change Mitigation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s0166497223001621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.