IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v63y2006i1p179-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From rhetoric to reality: Barriers faced by Health For All initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Berkeley, Dina
  • Springett, Jane

Abstract

The last two decades have witnessed an upsurge in the development and implementation of 'Health For All-type' initiatives in many parts of the world. However, despite the popularity of the approach, barriers and constraints to the fulfillment of their remit still persist, making it difficult for them to achieve the potential originally envisaged. Drawing upon considerable empirical work while evaluating the European Healthy City projects and English Health Action Zones, this paper explores the differences between barriers and constraints and then focuses on barriers as they manifest themselves in England. It distinguishes between cultural barriers, stemming from different philosophical, organisational, and professional/experiential cultures, and political barriers, stemming from both party political and realpolitik concerns. It discusses how these barriers often operate together, compounding their individual impacts, with detrimental effects for Health For All initiatives. Consequently, while the prevailing rhetoric appears to promote an alternative, and more appropriate, vision of how health can be maintained and enhanced, these barriers effectively function to sustain the hegemony of the status quo which was, and is, based on a different and outdated vision. We argue that acknowledging the continuous persistence of these barriers is an essential first step towards turning the prevailing health-related rhetoric into reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Berkeley, Dina & Springett, Jane, 2006. "From rhetoric to reality: Barriers faced by Health For All initiatives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 179-188, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:1:p:179-188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00663-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jewkes, Rachel & Murcott, Anne, 1998. "Community representatives: Representing the "community"?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 843-858, April.
    2. Pete Alcock, 2004. "Targets, indicators and milestones," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 211-227, June.
    3. de Leeuw, Evelyne & Skovgaard, Thomas, 2005. "Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: Problems with evidence generation and application," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1331-1341, September.
    4. Kickbusch, I., 2003. "The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(3), pages 383-388.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelaher, Margaret & Dunt, David & Feldman, Peter & Nolan, Andrea & Raban, Bridie, 2009. "The effect of an area-based intervention on breastfeeding rates in Victoria, Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 89-93, April.
    2. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    3. Albert Lee & Keiko Nakamura, 2021. "Engaging Diverse Community Groups to Promote Population Health through Healthy City Approach: Analysis of Successful Cases in Western Pacific Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Berkeley, Dina & Springett, Jane, 2006. "From rhetoric to reality: A systemic approach to understanding the constraints faced by Health For All initiatives in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2877-2889, December.
    5. Amy Weimann & Tolu Oni, 2019. "A Systematised Review of the Health Impact of Urban Informal Settlements and Implications for Upgrading Interventions in South Africa, a Rapidly Urbanising Middle-Income Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berkeley, Dina & Springett, Jane, 2006. "From rhetoric to reality: A systemic approach to understanding the constraints faced by Health For All initiatives in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2877-2889, December.
    2. Maria Warne & Åsa Svensson & Lina Tirén & Erika Wall, 2020. "On Time: A Qualitative Study of Swedish Students’, Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on School Attendance, with a Focus on Tardiness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Thurston, Wilfreda E. & MacKean, Gail & Vollman, Ardene & Casebeer, Ann & Weber, Myron & Maloff, Bretta & Bader, Judy, 2005. "Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 237-252, September.
    4. Michele Acuto & Benjamin Leffel, 2021. "Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1758-1774, July.
    5. Ana Louro & Nuno Marques da Costa & Eduarda Marques da Costa, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Policies as a Path to Healthy Cities—The Case Study of LMA, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-32, May.
    6. Frankish, C. James & Kwan, Brenda & Ratner, Pamela A. & Higgins, Joan Wharf & Larsen, Craig, 2002. "Social and political factors influencing the functioning of regional health boards in British Columbia (Canada)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 125-151, August.
    7. Chung, Kimberly & Lounsbury, David W., 2006. "The role of power, process, and relationships in participatory research for statewide HIV/AIDS programming," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2129-2140, October.
    8. Amy Carrad & Anne-Maree Parrish & Heather Yeatman, 2021. "Building Public Health Capacity through Organizational Change in the Sport System: A Multiple-Case Study within Australian Gymnastics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Hazel Williams-Roberts & Bonnie Jeffery & Shanthi Johnson & Nazeem Muhajarine, 2015. "The Effectiveness of Healthy Community Approaches on Positive Health Outcomes in Canada and the United States," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Jolley, Gwyneth, 2014. "Evaluating complex community-based health promotion: Addressing the challenges," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 71-81.
    11. Michele Acuto & Mika Morissette & Agis Tsouros, 2017. "City Diplomacy: Towards More Strategic Networking? Learning with WHO Healthy Cities," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 14-22, February.
    12. de Leeuw, Evelyne & Skovgaard, Thomas, 2005. "Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: Problems with evidence generation and application," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1331-1341, September.
    13. Goebbels, Adrienne F.G. & Lakerveld, Jeroen & Ament, André J.H.A. & Bot, Sandra D.M. & Severens, Johan L., 2012. "Exploring non-health outcomes of health promotion: The perspective of participants in a lifestyle behaviour change intervention," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 177-186.
    14. Tenbensel, Tim & Eagle, Samantha & Ashton, Toni, 2012. "Comparing health policy agendas across eleven high income countries: Islands of difference in a sea of similarity," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 29-36.
    15. Toby Freeman & Frances E. Baum & Gwyneth M. Jolley & Angela Lawless & Tahnia Edwards & Sara Javanparast & Anna Ziersch, 2016. "Service providers' views of community participation at six Australian primary healthcare services: scope for empowerment and challenges to implementation," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Pickard, Susan & Sheaff, Rod & Dowling, Bernard, 2006. "Exit, voice, governance and user-responsiveness: The case of English primary care trusts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 373-383, July.
    17. Emily Creamer & Simon Allen & Claire Haggett, 2019. "‘Incomers’ leading ‘community-led’ sustainability initiatives: A contradiction in terms?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(5), pages 946-964, August.
    18. repec:ilo:ilowps:375955 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. San Sebastián, Miguel & Hurtig, Anna Karin, 2005. "Oil development and health in the Amazon basin of Ecuador: the popular epidemiology process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 799-807, February.
    20. Belén Sanz-Barbero & Consuelo Corradi & Laura Otero-García & Alba Ayala & Carmen Vives-Cases, 2018. "The effect of macrosocial policies on violence against women: a multilevel study in 28 European countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(8), pages 901-911, November.
    21. Guta, Adrian & Strike, Carol & Flicker, Sarah & J. Murray, Stuart & Upshur, Ross & Myers, Ted, 2014. "Governing through community-based research: Lessons from the Canadian HIV research sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 250-261.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:1:p:179-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.