IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v390y2026ics0277953625012079.html

Sustaining healthy food retail: do Australian and New Zealand government policies consider long-term change?

Author

Listed:
  • Backman, Bettina
  • Blake, Miranda R.
  • Zorbas, Christina
  • Chung, Alexandra
  • Schulz, Sally
  • Brown, Victoria
  • Mäki, Päivi
  • Yoong, Serene

Abstract

Healthy food retail policies are government instruments designed to encourage healthier food and drink purchases by regulating aspects of food retail settings that influence consumer purchasing behaviour. This study examined how national and jurisdictional healthy food retail policies in Australia and New Zealand conceptualise and address the long-term sustainment of healthy food retail practices. A purposive sample of government policies and accompanying materials (e.g., implementation guidelines) published or updated between 2014 and 2025, was obtained using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index documents and systematic searches of government websites. Policies were analysed thematically using a multi-theory coding framework informed by problematisation theory, the Integrated Sustainability Framework (factors influencing sustainment), and sustainment-explicit Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change strategies. Thirty-three “policy cases” (main policy documents and accompanying materials) were included. Most policies were designed for public food retail settings, with school and healthcare food outlets being the most common. Four key themes were constructed: (1) sustainment is explicitly framed as a formal process that acknowledges complexity; (2) sustainment is often problematised implicitly through ‘sustainment strategies’ (e.g., compliance monitoring); (3) acknowledging top-down responsibility for sustainment; and (4) retailer responsibilities and sustainment challenges are rarely made explicit. Australia and New Zealand's healthy food retail policies focus on top-down sustainment and primarily place responsibility on public institutions. Long-term changes may be better supported when policies consider a broader range of systemic factors (e.g., profitability of healthy food) and include elements that facilitate capacity-building and shared responsibility between key actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Backman, Bettina & Blake, Miranda R. & Zorbas, Christina & Chung, Alexandra & Schulz, Sally & Brown, Victoria & Mäki, Päivi & Yoong, Serene, 2026. "Sustaining healthy food retail: do Australian and New Zealand government policies consider long-term change?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:390:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625012079
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625012079
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boelsen-Robinson, Tara & Blake, Miranda R. & Brown, Andrew D. & Huse, Oliver & Palermo, Claire & George, Neetu A. & Peeters, Anna, 2021. "Mapping factors associated with a successful shift towards healthier food retail in community-based organisations: A systems approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Lana Vanderlee & Sahar Goorang & Kimiya Karbasy & Stefanie Vandevijvere & Mary R L’Abbé, 2019. "Policies to Create Healthier Food Environments in Canada: Experts’ Evaluation and Prioritized Actions Using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Baker, P. & Hawkes, C. & Wingrove, K. & Demaio, A. & Parkhurst, Justin & Thow, A.M. & Walls, H., 2018. "What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanita Northcott & Mark Lawrence & Christine Parker & Phillip Baker, 2023. "Ecological regulation for healthy and sustainable food systems: responding to the global rise of ultra-processed foods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1333-1358, September.
    2. Leah Salm & Nicholas Nisbett & Katie Cuming & Tabitha Hrynick & Alexandra Lulache & Hayley MacGregor, 2023. "A whole system approach to childhood obesity: how a supportive environment was created in the city of Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 919-935, August.
    3. Shawar, Yusra Ribhi & Meraj, Shafkat & Koon, Adam D. & Shiffman, Jeremy, 2025. "Political factors shaping national systems of care for orphans and vulnerable children in low-income countries: Scoping review and framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Sylvain Charlebois & Amy Hill & Janèle Vezeau & Lydia Hunsberger & Maddy Johnston & Janet Music, 2022. "Assessing a Nation’s Competitiveness in Global Food Innovation: Creating a Global Food Innovation Index," World, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-40, January.
    5. Barlow, P. & Thow, A.M., 2021. "Neoliberal discourse, actor power, and the politics of nutrition policy: A qualitative analysis of informal challenges to nutrition labelling regulations at the World Trade Organization, 2007–2019," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    6. Lacy-Nichols, Jennifer & Scrinis, Gyorgy & Carey, Rachel, 2020. "The evolution of Coca-Cola Australia’s soft drink reformulation strategy 2003–2017: A thematic analysis of corporate documents," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Nicholas Nisbett & Jody Harris & Derek Headey & Mara den Bold & Stuart Gillespie & Noora-Lisa Aberman & Olutayo Adeyemi & Richmond Aryeetey & Rasmi Avula & Elodie Becquey & Scott Drimie & Elyse Iruhir, 2023. "Stories of change in nutrition: lessons from a new generation of studies from Africa, Asia and Europe," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 133-149, February.
    8. Brydie Clarke & Boyd Swinburn & Gary Sacks, 2018. "Understanding Health Promotion Policy Processes: A Study of the Government Adoption of the Achievement Program in Victoria, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Danielle Resnick & Kola Matthew Anigo & Olufolakemi Anjorin & Shilpa Deshpande, 2024. "Voice, access, and ownership: enabling environments for nutrition advocacy in India and Nigeria," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(3), pages 637-658, June.
    10. Clarke, Brydie & Swinburn, Boyd & Sacks, Gary, 2020. "Understanding the LiveLighter® obesity prevention policy processes: An investigation using political science and systems thinking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    11. Susan Caswell & Patti-Jean Naylor & Dana Olstad & Sara Kirk & Louise Mâsse & Kim Raine & Rhona Hanning, 2021. "Recreation Facility Food and Beverage Environments in Ontario, Canada: An Appeal for Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Anne Marie Thow, 2025. "Enhancing global support to address complex sustainable development policy challenges: Learning from success in cross‐sectoral nutrition policy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 1835-1847, April.
    13. Namugumya, Brenda Shenute & Candel, Jeroen J.L. & Talsma, Elise F. & Termeer, Catrien J.A.M., 2020. "A mechanisms-based explanation of nutrition policy (dis)integration processes in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Schulze, Christoph & Matzdorf, Bettina & Rommel, Jens & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & García-Llorente, Marina & Gutiérrez-Briceño, Inés & Larsson, Lina & Zagórska, Katarzyna & Zawadzki, Wojciech, 2024. "Between farms and forks: Food industry perspectives on the future of EU food labelling," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Heenan, Maddie & Jan, Stephen & Ralph, Martyn & Sacks, Gary & Swinburn, Boyd & Shanthosh, Janani, 2023. "Priority setting for non-communicable disease prevention – Co-producing a regulatory agenda informing novel codes of practice in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    16. Olutayo Adeyemi & Mara Bold & Nicholas Nisbett & Namukolo Covic, 2023. "Changes in Nigeria’s enabling environment for nutrition from 2008 to 2019 and challenges for reducing malnutrition," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 343-361, April.
    17. Ares, Gastón & Gómez Corona, Carlos & Antúnez, Lucía & Thow, Anne-Marie, 2025. "Public perceptions of front-of-package warning label during policy design and implementation in Uruguay: A content analysis of social media narratives," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Thow, Anne Marie & Harris, Patrick & Lencucha, Raphael, 2025. "Vision, relationships, patience … and power: A qualitative analysis of how policy agents scale up cross-sectoral policy for nutrition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    19. Zuzanna Turowska & Emilie Buttarelli & Issa Sombié & Nicholas Nisbett & Mara den Bold & Elodie Becquey, 2023. "Stories of change in nutrition in Burkina Faso 1992–2018: a macro-level perspective," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 535-554, April.
    20. Brydie Clarke & Janelle Kwon & Boyd Swinburn & Gary Sacks, 2021. "Understanding the dynamics of obesity prevention policy decision-making using a systems perspective: A case study of Healthy Together Victoria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:390:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625012079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.